240 likes | 573 Views
Orthodontic Bone Anchors. Parameters for Success. 1. OBA history – MK I MK II. 2. Delayed versus immediate loading. 3. Common indications. 4. Conclusion. + tube. 1999. 2002. 2000. 2001. + bracket. 2000. 2001. 2002. - slot.
E N D
Orthodontic Bone Anchors Parametersfor Success
1. OBA history – MK I MK II 2. Delayed versus immediate loading 3. Common indications 4. Conclusion
+ tube 1999 2002 2000 2001
+ bracket 2000 2001 2002
Publications on MK I Mommaerts M, Correia P, Nuttens S. Experiencia clinica com o “Ortho Bone Anchor – OBA” – Relatorio Preliminar Rev Port Estomat Med Dent Cir Maxilofac 42: 131-135, 2001 Mommaerts MY, Michiels ML, De Pauw GA. A 2-year outcome audit of a versatile orthodontic bone anchor. J Orthod. 32: 175-81, 2005
Results of MK I study • Placement between 2000 & 2002 • Follow-up till 2004 • 18 patients • 35 OBA’s 8,6% premature loss
Conclusions of MK I study Bayonet shaping of neck Diminishing height of coronal screw head Subtitle Texturising of fixation part Protection by fixed appliances
1. OBA history 2. Delayed versus immediate loading with MK II 3. Parameters for success 4. Conclusion
Location Mandible: 31 4 Maxilla: 13 11 Removed OBAs 2002-2005 Distal to 2,3,4 Distal to 5,6,7 Piriform aperture Zygomatic crest
Delayed versus immediate loading Removed OBAs Always 5mm coronally Years in situ # Premature loss Mobile screws upon removal Immediate mandible 23 15 1 2 mob+infl 1 lost mob 5mm (30): 5 7mm (13): 4 Delayed mandible 30 20 0 5mm (46): 7 7mm (8): 0 Always coronal Immediate maxilla 7 5 0 0 Delayed maxilla 35 19 0 3 mob+infl 5mm (11): 1 7mm (4): 0 No inflam response
1. OBA history 2. Delayed versus immediate loading 3. Common indications 4. Conclusion
1. OBA history 2. Delayed versus immediate loading 3. Indications 4. Conclusion MK II study
Coronal 5mm screws are vulnerable 2 important No big difference between immediate & delayed loading in mandible
Simple hook = workhorse March 2003 October 2005
Do not remove a mobile OBA too quickly! April 2002 October 2003