1 / 7

Science Teams

Science Teams. Scientific Coordination. Objectives Lessons from GONG An LWS/HMI Case in Point. Objectives. Focus Enable efforts larger in scale than an individual, or individual group, could undertake

jarah
Download Presentation

Science Teams

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Science Teams

  2. Scientific Coordination • Objectives • Lessons from GONG • An LWS/HMI Case in Point

  3. Objectives • Focus • Enable efforts larger in scale than an individual, or individual group, could undertake • Impact instrument & operations development, and initial scientific & operational capability [ 60 months] • Unlock the resources to do the work

  4. GONG Teams • Membership • Privileged access to data • Contribution to team objectives • Publication of program • Original Teams • Inversions • Models • Low Frequency • Data Reduction and Analysis • Nearly Steady Flows and Magnetic Fields • Magnetic Effects • Mode Physics • Teams • Some were important in formulation and then withered away • Some were extremely vital and played a major role in advancing the overall science • Darwin

  5. Local Helioseismology Comparison • Validate local-helioseismology methodologies & results pre-launch to achieve LWS/SDO objectives • Some participants: H. Antia, C. Barban, S. Basu, R. Bogart, D. Braun, D-Y. Chou, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, T. Corbard, T. Duvall, L. Gizon, I. Gonzalez Hernandez, D. Haber, J. Harvey, C. Henney, F. Hill, B. Hindman, R. Howe, S. Hughes, J M Jensen, R. Komm, S. Korzennik, A. Kosovichev, J. Leibacher, C. Lindsey, P. Rajaguru, E. Rhodes, P. Rose, P. Scherrer, J. Schou, S. Kholikov, M-T. Sun, M. Thompson, C. Toner, J. Toomre, M. Woodard, J. Zhao,and anybody else who would like to join the party • Umbrella/glue/support structure a la GONG Teams

  6. A Possible Approach to TR&T • Each participant has own proposal • Collective science words and identification with team stapled to front of each individual’s proposal • Commit to support science activities of team • Synergistic value is beneficial to individaul • + Umbrella • Science coordination • Meeting support • Joint publication costs

  7. Issues • Membership • Central Committee vs Federation • Umbrella/Science Support • How “LWS”y for technical efforts • Real value added

More Related