1 / 6

STEERING COMMITTEE IEC-ILAC-IAF Shanghai 2010-10-23 Item 6.2 IEC-ILAC-IAF/1005/DEC

STEERING COMMITTEE IEC-ILAC-IAF Shanghai 2010-10-23 Item 6.2 IEC-ILAC-IAF/1005/DEC. SUBJECT: Perspective of the “Joint Re-assessments model” and the new “unified Re-Assessment” model POTENTIAL OUTCOME OF NEW CONCEPT:

jermaine-rush
Download Presentation

STEERING COMMITTEE IEC-ILAC-IAF Shanghai 2010-10-23 Item 6.2 IEC-ILAC-IAF/1005/DEC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STEERING COMMITTEE IEC-ILAC-IAF Shanghai 2010-10-23 Item 6.2 IEC-ILAC-IAF/1005/DEC SUBJECT: Perspective of the “Joint Re-assessments model” and the new “unified Re-Assessment” model POTENTIAL OUTCOME OF NEW CONCEPT: The Joint Re-assessment model was the starting point of the collaboration between ILAC and IEC CA Systems followed by the same model with IAF.Although this model was a great step onward by the time it has shown its weakness essentially due to the lack of efficiency in the constitution of the Assessment Team with two different Lead Assessors and two different Assessment Reports.The new Model, today identified as the “Unified Re-assessment” is a major step ahead as it really constitute an assessment aiming at to represent the “Parties” with a real pragmatic and efficient approach. ACTION: The Steering Committee to note, reiterate support and agree on improvements that are deemed necessary.

  2. Assessment Report The Accreditation Body appoints a Lead Assessor and 1 or more Technical Assessors ACCREDITATION BODY Complete The IEC System appoints a Lead Assessor and 1 or more Technical Assessors Assessment Report IEC System Joint Re-assessmentsmodel Common Testing Laboratory AB + IEC System Joint Re-Assessment agreed?

  3. ILAC / IAFMember AB IEC C.A. System • Appointment of: • Lead Assessor • Technical Assessor(s) • Appointment of: • Lead Assessor • Technical Assessor(s) IEC C. A. System ASSESSMENT REPORT ILAC / IAF ASSESSMENT REPORT ON-SITE ASSESSMENT Joint Re-assessmentsmodel

  4. Unified Re-assessment agreed? Unified Re-assessmentsmodel On a yearly basis, end of October, for the following year, IEC C.A. Systems send the list of re-assessments to ILAC and IAF Secretariat The ILAC and IAF Secretariat circulate the list to their member Accreditation Bodies The IECEE Secretariat informs its NCBs/CBTLs to undergo a unified Re-Assessment if they so wish ∞ No Yes Unified Re-assessment process can start

  5. + Short list of pre-selectedTechnical Assessor(s) Technical Assessor Technical Assessor Lead Assessor Lead Assessor Data Base of a Common Pool of Registered Technical Assessors ON-SITE ASSESSMENT France COMMON ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMON ASSESSMENT REPORT Unified Re-assessmentsmodel Example for Testing Laboratory IEC C.A. SystemSecretariat ILACMember AB Testing Laboratory accredited by COFRAC and accepted by the IECEE Selection and appointment of: +

  6. + Short list of pre-selectedTechnical Assessor(s) Technical Assessor Technical Assessor Lead Assessor Lead Assessor Data Base of a Common Pool of Registered Technical Assessors COMMON ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMON ASSESSMENT REPORT Unified Re-assessmentsmodel Example for Certification Body IEC C.A. SystemSecretariat IAFMember AB Certification Body accredited by NATA and registered by the IECEE System Selection and appointment of: Australia + ON-SITE ASSESSMENT

More Related