290 likes | 299 Views
Presented by Habte Kassa, this update discusses the CBMPO Regional Travel Demand Model, its purpose, major activities, and future projections. It includes model inputs, validation results, and future year scenarios.
E N D
CBMPO Regional Travel Demand Model 2019 Update Presented by Habte Kassa Technical Services & Air Quality Branch Chief GDOT- Office of Planning 404.631.1797 / hkassa@dot.ga.gov Technical Coordinating Committee Meeting June 19, 2019
Background • Federal legislation requires Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) updates every four to five years • The LRTP covers a minimum 20-year planning horizon with fiscal constraint • The next LRTP must be adopted by February 2, 2020 • MAP-21 / FAST Act encourage performance-based approach
What is a Travel Demand Model and its Purpose • State-of-the-art analysis tool • To replicate the existing travel demand • To forecast future travel demand • To identify transportation network deficiencies and prioritize projects.
2015Highway Network Source: GDOT 2015 Functional Classification data GDOT 2015 RC data MPO review
2015Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) Total Number of TAZs: • Model Area: 215
Socio-economic Data Provided by MPO Staff 29% 26% 63% 4% % Growth (K-12 + College)
Base Year Model Outputs Model Validation Results
2015 Model Validation Model Highway Mileage & Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) by Facility Type (1) 2015 GDOT VMT – GDOT Mileage by Route and Road System Report 445. http://www.dot.ga.gov/DriveSmart/Data/Documents/400%20Series/445/DPP445_2015.pdf
Traffic Counts vs. Modeled Volume R-squared = 0.95 Recommended target R-squared = 0.88 Source: Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual, Second Edition, FHWA, 2010
2015 Total Daily Traffic Volumes Note: Total volume for both direction
Level of Service (LOS) • Based on 2016 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology • LOS was derived using the Travel Demand Model • LOS compares volumes along the roadway to the capacity of that roadway
2050 LRTP Scenarios • Do-Nothing • Existing + Committed • Completion of STIP/TIP system projects • Long Range Transportation Plan system projects • Financially Constrained Plan
2050 “Do-Nothing” Total Daily Traffic Volumes Note: Total volume for both direction
2040 “Do-Nothing” Level of Service (LOS) Results obtained from last LRTP models, for comparison purpose.
Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) by Facility Type 66% ↑ 36% ↑ Collector 31% ↑ Minor Arterial Principal Arterial 35% ↑ Interstate
Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) by Level of Service 35% 0.5% 14.3% 18% 34.2% 20% 51% 27%
Daily Vehicle Hours of Travel (VHT) by Facility Type 99% ↑ 87% ↑ 82% ↑ Collector Minor Arterial 169% ↑ Principal Arterial Expressway
Next Steps • MPO provides project list for remaining scenarios • Evaluate remaining future year LRTP scenarios • Analyze system performance • Provide outputs to MPO planners to prioritize projects
THANK YOU Questions ?