National PNT Architecture Implementation Plan Way Ahead

1. National PNT Architecture Implementation Plan Way Ahead Mr Hal Hagemeier Deputy Director, National Security Space Office 14-15 October 2010 PA CLEARED 2010-0576

2. National PNT Architecture Implementation Plan Way Ahead What walls might we run into? How big might they be? How might we avoid them? If unavoidable, how might we get on the other side? PA CLEARED 2010-0576

3. Overview • National PNT Architecture • Development and Transition • Implementation Plan • Implementation Plan Alignment • Reference Materials PA CLEARED 2010-0576

4. Based on Long-Term Vision Should-Be Architecture Near & Mid -Term Decisions Guided by Architecture Capability Evolved Baseline (EBL) Without Enterprise Architecture Strategy As-Is Architecture ArchitectureEmphasis System Emphasis Now 5 Years 10 Years 15 Years 20 Years National PNT Architecture • Eighteen month effort: • 31 civil and military Federal agencies • 200+ people • Provide more effective and efficient PNT capabilities to USG • Vision, Strategy, Vectors and Recommendations approved June 2008 NII NII RITA RITA AT&L/S&T AT&L/S&T PBFA PBFA FAA FAA JS JS FHWA FHWA USA USA FRA FRA USN USN DOC DOC USMC USMC USAF USAF NIST NIST SAF/USA SAF/USA DHS DHS NGA NGA USCG USCG NSA NSA DOI DOI STRAT STRAT SMDC SMDC DOS DOS AFSPC AFSPC NASA NASA USNO USNO JPDO JPDO NRL NRL NCO NCO SMC SMC NSSO NSSO PA CLEARED 2010-0576

5. Development & Transition Planning Process   Identified Capability Gaps ArchitectureDevelopment Developed Recommendations to Address Capability Gaps   Implementation Plan Integrates Tasks & Highlights Near-Term Priorities ArchitectureTransitionPlanning Defined Implementation Tasks by Recommendation PA CLEARED 2010-0576

6. Implementation Plan • Approved July 2010 • 40+ tasks map to National PNT Architecture strategy, vectors, and recommendations • Places PNT community on a path to achieve 2025 “Should-Be” Architecture PA CLEARED 2010-0576

7. Implementation Plan Alignment • Architecture identified four vectors and 19 principal recommendations • 18 of 19 Recommendations in Implementation Plan • “Cooperative Organizational Structures” • Team couldn't achieve consensus on appropriate implementation tasks and balance between: • Department and agency roles and responsibilities • Resources for implementation • Structures able to monitor and facilitate implementation PA CLEARED 2010-0576

8. Reference Materials • National Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Architecture Study Final Report, Sept 2008 • Includes study Terms of Reference • Describes development methodology and alternate architectures evaluated • Describes architecture vision, strategy, vectors, and recommendations • Includes Architecture Guidance Memo approving these and directing transition planning • National Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Architecture Implementation Plan, April 2010 • Includes Architecture Implementation Memo approving plan • Highlights necessary and immediate tasks to implement the architecture, organized by vector • Both documents are available to the public at http://www.acq.osd.mil/nsso/pnt/pnt.htm PA CLEARED 2010-0576

9. National PNT Architecture Implementation Plan Way Ahead Perform an independent assessment of the way ahead for the National PNT Architecture Implementation Plan. • What can the Departments and Agencies do to ensure the successful implementation of the Plan? • What sort of organizational, functional, or technical issues does the Board believe may impede successful implementation of the Plan? • How can the Departments and Agencies reduce the likelihood that these impediments occur? • How can the Departments and Agencies reduce the effect these impediments may have? PA CLEARED 2010-0576

10. Mr Hal Hagemeier Deputy Director, NSSO Hal.Hagemeier@osd.mil 571-432-1403 CAPT Kevin Andersen Chief, PNT Division, NSSO nsso.pnt@osd.mil 571-432-1433 Points of Contact http://www.acq.osd.mil/nsso/pnt/pnt.htm PA CLEARED 2010-0576

11. PA CLEARED 2010-0576