130 likes | 287 Views
6 th Interregional Meeting Veneto, Italy. RAG Report. RAG Report - Overview. Average number on RAG groups has grown from 9 in the first semester to 14 reported in the fifth semester Very little change in the composition of RAGs. They still tend to favour slightly the policy makers/brokers
E N D
6th Interregional MeetingVeneto, Italy. RAG Report
RAG Report - Overview • Average number on RAG groups has grown from 9 in the first semester to 14 reported in the fifth semester • Very little change in the composition of RAGs. They still tend to favour slightly the policy makers/brokers • Lack of stakeholders involved in the private sector
RAG Report - Overview There has been no change with how the partners think the RAG can help them; most commonly cited reasons are; • Expertise, advice and knowhow • project promotion and involvement of key local actors
RAG Report - Overview Again the main outcomes listed by the project partners from working with the RAG groups were; • Transferring good/best practise • Ideas and Networking, connecting academics and policy makers for the mutual benefit of both • Support after end of project
RAG Report - Overview • All partners with the exception of two have held and reported on three RAG meetings each, and two partners have held and reported on four RAG meetings • Original application form stated 8 RAG meetings to be held in semesters 1, 3 and 5
RAG Report - Overview Partners continue to set their own themes for RAG meetings Most commonly reported third meeting themes • BREEAM & CfSH • Eco-innovation and the RIS • Policy Impact & implementation /importing of GPs.
RAG Report - Overview The majority of PP’s still intend to earn support of the relevant regional stakeholder by • Including them in the RAG group • By using experts • Competent analysis • Exchanging of ideas • Clear and concise recommendations
RAG Report - Overview • PP’s intend to ensure the outputs are well understood by having a well developed communication strategy and by disseminating the results of FRESH to the relevant stakeholders • Be careful to ensure that the RAG group does not fall into the trap of merely disseminating the FRESH project activities but instead takes a firm grasp on trying to make a policy impact
RAG Report – Stakeholders Involvement • Wide range of stakeholders involved from Planners to SME’s and Universities • Levels of involvement vary • Majority of partners who reported state that the RAG groups are currently involved with Policy Change or Policy Impact
RAG Report – Different Types of Groups • Different RAG groups are evident even within the same country • These different Groups evolved tailored to the specific needs/strengths/weaknesses of each region
RAG Report –Suggestions / Improvements • Ask RAG members for suggestions • Exchange at transnational level, (how other RAGs set up, main obstacles, how they solved problems etc.) • Involve members of the RIS3 sector groups
Key Contacts For more information please contact Sonya Quinn squinn@swra.ie John Forde jforde@swra.ie