1 / 14

Chief Architects Forum June 29, 2009

Chief Architects Forum June 29, 2009. Target Segmentation Activities John Sullivan, AIC Governance Subcommittee Co-Chair. Analysis of EASR v1.1 Submissions. Government-wide: 566 discrete segments reported Wide variation of scope and granularity of segments Data quality improvements needed

jin
Download Presentation

Chief Architects Forum June 29, 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chief Architects ForumJune 29, 2009 Target Segmentation Activities John Sullivan, AIC Governance Subcommittee Co-Chair

  2. Analysis of EASR v1.1 Submissions Government-wide: 566 discrete segments reported Wide variation of scope and granularity of segments Data quality improvements needed Alignment with Exhibit 53 essential Will require some remapping of investments to either segments or BRMs Major future improvements are being addressed: Improve submission process and tools Harmonize with other management data collections Targeted data quality improvements Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 2

  3. Desired Segment Architecture Outcomes Expedite and reduce costs of agency segment architecture development efforts by: Leveraging “completed” segments Sharing/reusing architecturally actionable artifacts Standardize segment architectures within Lines of Business and across agencies, where advantageous. Maximize awareness and use of reference architectures Improve integration of segment architectures, as well as CPIC and budget processes Clearly define LoB architectures with: Clearly defined interface/integration points, within and across LoBs Clarity of how agencies engage LoBs with process, data, and service perspectives Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government 3

  4. Priority Target Segment Standardization • Mission Segments: Focus on interoperability and Information Sharing • Business Segments: Focus on shared common architectures and services • Mission Segments: Focus on standardized reference architectures Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  5. Core Mission – Potential Segments • Funding levels based upon current public Exhibit 53 data

  6. Potential Business Segments • Funding levels based upon current public Exhibit 53 data

  7. Potential Enterprise Segments • Funding levels based upon current public Exhibit 53 data

  8. FEA Segment Analysis by Agency(February) *data based on 2/27/09 submission Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  9. Framework for Segment Harmonization 9 Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  10. Segment Definition: Financial Management Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  11. Segment Definition: IT Infrastructure Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  12. Segment Definition: Information Sharing Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  13. Pertinent Timeline • July 2 – Agencies complete EASR update • July 6th week – update of EASR analytics • July 10th – MAX wiki open for standard segmentation definition and editing • July 28th - Standard Segment Workshop • Early August – Vetting of recommendations • August - Agency Feed-back meetings with recommendations for standard segments • August/September – Coordination of EASR updates with Draft Exhibit 53 submissions

  14. Open Discussion and Close Questions? Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

More Related