A Nemzetk zi B r s g, valamint annak f ggo s k zelm ltban befejezett gyei.

1. A Nemzetk�zi B�r�s�g, valamint annak f�ggo �s k�zelm�ltban befejezett �gyei. Nagy Boldizs�r eload�sa az ELTE �llam- �s Jogtudom�nyi Kar�n 2010

2. Az eload�s szerkezete BEVEZET�S alapk�rd�sek a fejlod�s eszm�je a NKB ig�nybev�tel�vel j�r� elony�k �s h�tr�nyok T�RT�NETE, FUNKCI�I, AZ AKTU�LIS �GYTEHER A B�R�S�G �SSZET�TELE PERES ELJ�R�S felek joghat�s�g alkalmazand� jog az elj�r�s a B�r�s�g belso gyakorlata, �t�lethozatal v�grehajt�s, �rtelmez�s, fel�lvizsg�lat TAN�CSAD� V�LEM�NY �RT�KEL�S

3. Zavarbaejto k�rd�sek * A B�r�s�gok sz�m�nak n�veked�se �s specializ�l�d�suk k�v�natos-e? (Tengerjogi B�r�s�g, Nemzetk�zi B�ntetob�r�s�g, t�rv�nysz�kek, emberi jogi b�r�s�gok, a K�rnyezetv�delmi B�r�s�g �tlete) * Fejlettebb-e egy jogrendszer, ha t�bb �gyet visznek B�r�s�g el�? * Politikai k�rd�sek eld�nthetoek-e jogi eszk�z�kkel? (Nicaragua, Lockerbie, Nukle�ris fegyverek haszn�lata, a Fal Palesztin�ban) * Lehet-e az igazs�g szavaz�s t�rgya?

4. T�rt�nete, funkci�i, f�ggo �gyek T�rt�nete Elozm�nyek: V�lasztott b�r�skod�s, Alabama �gy 1899. I. h�gai b�kekonferencia: �NVB 1907. XII. H�gai Egyezm�ny: Nemzetk�zi Zs�km�nyb�r�s�g 1908 � 1918: K�z�p-amerikai B�r�s�g 1920. �NKB Funkci�i Peresked�s: csak �llamok k�z�tt Tan�csad� v�lem�ny: ENSZ szerveinek �s test�leteinek �gyek �ll�sa ld. a k�pek ut�n

5. A B�r�s�g �p�lete, a B�kepalota (Peace Palace) H�ga

6. Great Hall of Justice (Az igazs�g nagyterme) �s Hisashi Owada b�r�, az ICJ eln�ke (2009-) Each Member of the Court receives an annual salary of US$170,080, with a special supplementary allowance of US$15,000 for the President, and, on leaving the Court, they receive annual pensions which, after a nine-year term of office, amount to US$80,00 http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?p1=1&p2=2 � l�t: 2009. �pr 16Each Member of the Court receives an annual salary of US$170,080, with a special supplementary allowance of US$15,000 for the President, and, on leaving the Court, they receive annual pensions which, after a nine-year term of office, amount to US$80,00 http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?p1=1&p2=2 � l�t: 2009. �pr 16

7. A Nemzetk�zi B�r�s�g f�ggo �gyei2010 tavasz�n

8. F�ggo peres �gyek (2010 m�jus�ban szeml�lve) �gy Felek T�rgy kezdet/ perbeli  joghat�s�g cselekm�nyek T�voll�t�ben hal�lra �t�lte egy cs�di b�ntetob�r�s�g az emberiess�g elleni bun�kkel v�dolt Hissene Habr� volt cs�di eln�k�t �s tizenegy l�zad�vez�rt az �llambiztons�g megs�rt�se miatt. A tizenk�t el�t�ltet a b�r�s�g bun�snek tal�lta az alkotm�nyos rend, a ter�leti integrit�s �s a biztons�g megs�rt�s�ben" - k�z�lte egy b�r�s�gi illet�kes. A hal�lra�t�ltek k�z�tt van Mahamat Nouri t�bornok, a Deby �ltal 1990-ben eluz�tt Habr� k�zeli munkat�rsa, illetve a Habr�-korm�ny volt v�delmi minisztere is. T�voll�t�ben hal�lra �t�lte egy cs�di b�ntetob�r�s�g az emberiess�g elleni bun�kkel v�dolt Hissene Habr� volt cs�di eln�k�t �s tizenegy l�zad�vez�rt az �llambiztons�g megs�rt�se miatt. A tizenk�t el�t�ltet a b�r�s�g bun�snek tal�lta az alkotm�nyos rend, a ter�leti integrit�s �s a biztons�g megs�rt�s�ben" - k�z�lte egy b�r�s�gi illet�kes. A hal�lra�t�ltek k�z�tt van Mahamat Nouri t�bornok, a Deby �ltal 1990-ben eluz�tt Habr� k�zeli munkat�rsa, illetve a Habr�-korm�ny volt v�delmi minisztere is.

9. F�ggo peres �gyek ( 2010 m�jus�ban szeml�lve) �gy Felek T�rgy kezdet/ perbeli  joghat�s�g cselekm�nyek However, at the NATO Summit in Bucharest which took place from 2 to 4 April 2008, the Respondent, acting through its organs and agents, objected to the Applicant's application to join NATO, despite the fact that the Applicant had made clear that it would be referred to in its membership of NATO in the manner provided by paragraph 2 of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 817 (1993). The reason for the Respondent's objection is stated to be its desire to resolve the difference between the Parties concerning the constitutional name of the Applicant as an essential precondition to the Applicant's NATO membership. The Respondent's objection, which amounts to a veto, has meant that the Applicant is unable to join NATO � r�szlet a macedon k�relembol However, at the NATO Summit in Bucharest which took place from 2 to 4 April 2008, the Respondent, acting through its organs and agents, objected to the Applicant's application to join NATO, despite the fact that the Applicant had made clear that it would be referred to in its membership of NATO in the manner provided by paragraph 2 of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 817 (1993). The reason for the Respondent's objection is stated to be its desire to resolve the difference between the Parties concerning the constitutional name of the Applicant as an essential precondition to the Applicant's NATO membership. The Respondent's objection, which amounts to a veto, has meant that the Applicant is unable to join NATO � r�szlet a macedon k�relembol

10. F�ggo peres �gyek ( 2010 m�jus�ban szeml�lve) �gy Felek T�rgy kezdet/ perbeli  joghat�s�g cselekm�nyek Kolumbia az USA-val egy�ttmuk�dve a levegobol k�zd a kolumbiai cocatermelok ellen, az o f�ldjeiket permetezi, de �tsz�ll (�tpermermtez) ecuadroba is. Az ecuadori farmerek m�r az USA-ban is kezdtek polg�ri pert. =7 �ve t�rgyal E �s K az �gyrol Kolumbia az USA-val egy�ttmuk�dve a levegobol k�zd a kolumbiai cocatermelok ellen, az o f�ldjeiket permetezi, de �tsz�ll (�tpermermtez) ecuadroba is. Az ecuadori farmerek m�r az USA-ban is kezdtek polg�ri pert. =7 �ve t�rgyal E �s K az �gyrol

11. F�ggo peres �gyek ( 2010 m�jus�ban szeml�lve) �gy Felek T�rgy kezdet/ perbeli  joghat�s�g cselekm�nyek

12. Kolumbia: 1. egy 1928-as szerz rendezte a k�rd�st, ez�rt a Bogotai paktum szerint nem viheto Bs�g el� - Nic: 1928 vagy �rv�nytelen, vagy megszunt �s egy�bk�nt sem t�r ki az �sszes vitatott k�rd�sre The Court notes that, with respect to the validity of the 1928 Treaty, Nicaragua first contends that the Treaty was �concluded in manifest violation of the Nicaraguan Constitution of 1911 that was in force in 1928� and, secondly, that at the time the Treaty was concluded, Nicaragua was under military occupation by the United States and was precluded from concluding treaties that ran contrary to the interests of the United States and from rejecting the conclusion of treaties that the United States demanded it to conclude. Nicaragua submits in this respect that Colombia was aware of this situation and �took advantage of the US occupation of Nicaragua to extort from her the conclusion of the 1928 Treaty�. Nicaragua claims that it remained under the influence of the United States even after the withdrawal of the last United States troops at the beginning of 1933. Colombia, for its part, maintains that Nicaragua�s assertion relating to the invalidity of the 1928 Treaty is unfounded. It observes that, even assuming that the 1928 Treaty was incompatible with Nicaragua�s 1911 Constitution or that Nicaragua lacked competence to freely conclude treaties due to occupation by the United States, these claims were not raised during the ratification process in the Nicaraguan Congress in 1930, nor for some 50 years thereafter. � The Court recalls that Nicaragua advanced �the nullity and lack of validity� of the 1928 Treaty for the first time in an official declaration and White Paper published on 4 February 1980. ..the Court considers that it is clear on the face of the text of Article I that the matter of sovereignty over the islands of San Andr�s, Providencia and Santa Catalina has been settled by the 1928 Treaty (Kolumbi��!) Ez�rt ezek tekintet�ben Kolumbia joghat�s�gi kifog�sa meg�ll Nicaragua azon �rve, h. Kolumbia szerz. szeg�se szuntette meg az 1928-as szerzod�st �rdektelen, mert a l�trehozott szuv-t nem �rinten� _________________________ 2. Az al�vet�sivel szemben Bogota erosebb mint lex spec �s lex post, ha Bogota alapj�n nincs- akkor 36 2 alapj�n nem lehet.. Ezt nem d�nti el, mert az a�vet�si alapj�n sem lehetne, hisz a 3 sziget tekintet�ben a bs�g szerint nincs vita, azok Kolumbi��. Kolumbia: 1. egy 1928-as szerz rendezte a k�rd�st, ez�rt a Bogotai paktum szerint nem viheto Bs�g el� - Nic: 1928 vagy �rv�nytelen, vagy megszunt �s egy�bk�nt sem t�r ki az �sszes vitatott k�rd�sre The Court notes that, with respect to the validity of the 1928 Treaty, Nicaragua first contends that the Treaty was �concluded in manifest violation of the Nicaraguan Constitution of 1911 that was in force in 1928� and, secondly, that at the time the Treaty was concluded, Nicaragua was under military occupation by the United States and was precluded from concluding treaties that ran contrary to the interests of the United States and from rejecting the conclusion of treaties that the United States demanded it to conclude. Nicaragua submits in this respect that Colombia was aware of this situation and �took advantage of the US occupation of Nicaragua to extort from her the conclusion of the 1928 Treaty�. Nicaragua claims that it remained under the influence of the United States even after the withdrawal of the last United States troops at the beginning of 1933. Colombia, for its part, maintains that Nicaragua�s assertion relating to the invalidity of the 1928 Treaty is unfounded. It observes that, even assuming that the 1928 Treaty was incompatible with Nicaragua�s 1911 Constitution or that Nicaragua lacked competence to freely conclude treaties due to occupation by the United States, these claims were not raised during the ratification process in the Nicaraguan Congress in 1930, nor for some 50 years thereafter. � The Court recalls that Nicaragua advanced �the nullity and lack of validity� of the 1928 Treaty for the first time in an official declaration and White Paper published on 4 February 1980. ..the Court considers that it is clear on the face of the text of Article I that the matter of sovereignty over the islands of San Andr�s, Providencia and Santa Catalina has been settled by the 1928 Treaty (Kolumbi��!) Ez�rt ezek tekintet�ben Kolumbia joghat�s�gi kifog�sa meg�ll Nicaragua azon �rve, h. Kolumbia szerz. szeg�se szuntette meg az 1928-as szerzod�st �rdektelen, mert a l�trehozott szuv-t nem �rinten� _________________________ 2. Az al�vet�sivel szemben Bogota erosebb mint lex spec �s lex post, ha Bogota alapj�n nincs- akkor 36 2 alapj�n nem lehet.. Ezt nem d�nti el, mert az a�vet�si alapj�n sem lehetne, hisz a 3 sziget tekintet�ben a bs�g szerint nincs vita, azok Kolumbi��.

14. A nem t�voli m�ltban alkotott tan�csad� v�lem�nyekC�me T�rgya D�tuma Tartalma �render an advisory opinion on the following question: Is the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo in accordance with international law�render an advisory opinion on the following question: Is the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo in accordance with international law

15. A k�zelm�ltban befejezett peres �gyek (2010 tavasz�n) �gy Felek T�rgy Idopont D�nt�s The Court observes that it does not consider that it is required to take a position in this case on whether and to what extent there exists, in customary international law, a r�gime applicable to navigation on �international rivers�, either of universal scope or of a regional nature covering the geographical area in which the San Juan is situated. (Summary) 45. The Parties� disagreement is greatest on the meaning of the words �con objetos de comercio�. For Nicaragua, this expression must be translated into French as �avec des marchandises de commerce� and into English as �with articles of trade�; in other words, the �objetos� in question here are objects in the concrete and material sense of the term. Consequently, the freedom of navigation guaranteed to Costa Rica by Article VI relates only to the transport of goods intended to be sold in a commercial exchange. For Costa Rica, on the contrary, the expression means in French �� des fins de commerce� and in English �for the purposes of commerce�; the �objetos� in the original text are therefore said to be objects in the abstract sense of ends and purposes. Consequently, according to Costa Rica, the freedom of navigation given to it by the Treaty must be attributed the broadest possible scope, and in any event encompasses not only the transport of goods but also the transport of passengers, including tourists. (Bs�g: Costa ric�nak van igaza, mert csak akkor van r�telme a teljes mondatnak) Nicaragua contends that it is important to give the words used in the Treaty the meaning they had at the time the Treaty was concluded, not their current meaning, which can be quite different, because this is the only way to remain true to the intent of the drafters of the Treaty; and determining that intent is the main task in the work of interpretation. 59. Costa Rica argues that �commerce� as used in the Treaty takes in any activity in pursuit of commercial purposes and includes, inter alia, the transport of passengers, tourists among them, as well as of goods. Bs�g: korl�tlan idore k�t�tt szerzod�sn�l fel kell t�telezni a fogalom al� tatoz� jelent�s v�ltoz�s�t �keresedelmi �amit ma �rtenek ezen, nem a XIX sz-ban � turizmus is.The Court observes that it does not consider that it is required to take a position in this case on whether and to what extent there exists, in customary international law, a r�gime applicable to navigation on �international rivers�, either of universal scope or of a regional nature covering the geographical area in which the San Juan is situated. (Summary) 45. The Parties� disagreement is greatest on the meaning of the words �con objetos de comercio�. For Nicaragua, this expression must be translated into French as �avec des marchandises de commerce� and into English as �with articles of trade�; in other words, the �objetos� in question here are objects in the concrete and material sense of the term. Consequently, the freedom of navigation guaranteed to Costa Rica by Article VI relates only to the transport of goods intended to be sold in a commercial exchange. For Costa Rica, on the contrary, the expression means in French �� des fins de commerce� and in English �for the purposes of commerce�; the �objetos� in the original text are therefore said to be objects in the abstract sense of ends and purposes. Consequently, according to Costa Rica, the freedom of navigation given to it by the Treaty must be attributed the broadest possible scope, and in any event encompasses not only the transport of goods but also the transport of passengers, including tourists. (Bs�g: Costa ric�nak van igaza, mert csak akkor van r�telme a teljes mondatnak) Nicaragua contends that it is important to give the words used in the Treaty the meaning they had at the time the Treaty was concluded, not their current meaning, which can be quite different, because this is the only way to remain true to the intent of the drafters of the Treaty; and determining that intent is the main task in the work of interpretation. 59. Costa Rica argues that �commerce� as used in the Treaty takes in any activity in pursuit of commercial purposes and includes, inter alia, the transport of passengers, tourists among them, as well as of goods. Bs�g: korl�tlan idore k�t�tt szerzod�sn�l fel kell t�telezni a fogalom al� tatoz� jelent�s v�ltoz�s�t �keresedelmi �amit ma �rtenek ezen, nem a XIX sz-ban � turizmus is.

16. A k�zelm�ltban befejezett peres �gyek (2010 tavasz�n) �gy Felek T�rgy Idopont D�nt�s Finds that the French Republic, by not giving the Republic of Djibouti the reasons for its refusal to execute the letter rogatory presented by the latter on 3 November 2004, failed to comply with its international obligation under Article 17 of the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the two Parties, signed in Djibouti on 27 September 1986, and that its finding of this violation constitutes appropriate satisfaction; ___________________ Malaysia states in its written pleadings that it �has an original title to Pulau Batu Puteh of long standing. Pulau Batu Puteh is, and has always been, part of the Malaysian State of Johor. Nothing has happened to displace Malaysia�s sovereignty over it. Singapore�s presence on the island for the sole purpose of constructing and maintaining a lighthouse there ? with the permission of the territorial sovereign ? is insufficient to vest sovereignty in it.� Malaysia further says that the island �could not at any relevant time be considered as terra nullius and hence susceptible to acquisition through occupation�. Singapore claims that �the selection of Pedra Branca as the site for building of the lighthouse with the authorization of the British Crown�, a process which started in 1847, �constituted a classic taking of possession � titre de souverain�. According to Singapore, title to the island was acquired by the British Crown in accordance with the legal principles of that time and has since �been maintained by the British Crown and its lawful successor, the Republic of Singapore� ____________________________.Finds that the French Republic, by not giving the Republic of Djibouti the reasons for its refusal to execute the letter rogatory presented by the latter on 3 November 2004, failed to comply with its international obligation under Article 17 of the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the two Parties, signed in Djibouti on 27 September 1986, and that its finding of this violation constitutes appropriate satisfaction; ___________________ Malaysia states in its written pleadings that it �has an original title to Pulau Batu Puteh of long standing. Pulau Batu Puteh is, and has always been, part of the Malaysian State of Johor. Nothing has happened to displace Malaysia�s sovereignty over it. Singapore�s presence on the island for the sole purpose of constructing and maintaining a lighthouse there ? with the permission of the territorial sovereign ? is insufficient to vest sovereignty in it.� Malaysia further says that the island �could not at any relevant time be considered as terra nullius and hence susceptible to acquisition through occupation�. Singapore claims that �the selection of Pedra Branca as the site for building of the lighthouse with the authorization of the British Crown�, a process which started in 1847, �constituted a classic taking of possession � titre de souverain�. According to Singapore, title to the island was acquired by the British Crown in accordance with the legal principles of that time and has since �been maintained by the British Crown and its lawful successor, the Republic of Singapore� ____________________________.

17. Az ig�nyek �s a d�nt�s

18. A k�zelm�ltban befejezett peres �gyek (2010 tavasz�n) �gy Felek T�rgy Idopont D�nt�s Sem a gyarmati �ti possidetis sem az effectivit�s alapj�n nem lehet d�nteni. 2001-et v�lasztj�k d�nto pillanatnak Having considered the arguments and evidence put forward by the Parties, the Court finds that the effectivit�s invoked by Honduras evidenced an �intention and will to act as sovereign� and constitute a modest but real display of authority over the four islands. Although it has not been established that the four islands are of economic or strategic importance and in spite of the scarcity of acts of State authority, Honduras has shown a sufficient overall pattern of conduct to demonstrate its intention to act as sovereign in respect of Bobel Cay, Savanna Cay, Port Royal Cay and South Cay. The Court further notes that those Honduran activities qualifying as effectivit�s which can be assumed to have come to the knowledge of Nicaragua did not elicit any protest on the part of the latter. With regard to Nicaragua, the Court has found no proof of intention or will to act as sovereign, and no proof of any actual exercise or display of authority over the islands. Nincs uti possidetis, vagy hagyom�nyos tengeri hat�r The most logical and widely practised approach is first to draw provisionally an equidistance line and then to consider whether that line must be adjusted in the light of the existence of special circumstances mondta m�r Quatar-Bahreinben It states that the use of a bisector ? the line formed by bisecting the angle created by thelinear approximations of coastlines ? has proved to be a viable substitute method in certaincircumstances where equidistance is not possible or appropriate. The justification for theapplication of the bisector method in maritime delimitation lies in the configuration of andrelationship between the relevant coastal fronts and the maritime areas to be delimited. In instanceswhere, as in the present case, any base points that could be determined by the Court are inherentlyunstable, the bisector method may be seen as an approximation of the equidistance method. Like equidistance, the bisector method is a geometrical approach that can be used to give legal effect tothe�criterion long held to be as equitable as it is simple, namely that in principle, while having regard to the special circumstances of the case, one should aim at an equal division of areas where the maritime projections of the coasts of the States . . .converge and overlap� Az �ltal�nos partvonalat vette alapul, arra �ll�tott egyenlo t�vols�g-egyenest Thus, a Honduran coastal front running to Punta Patuca and a Nicaraguan coastal front running to Wouhnta are in the Court�s view the relevant coasts for purposes of drawing the bisector. This resulting bisector line has an azimuth of 70� 14' 41.25". Sem a gyarmati �ti possidetis sem az effectivit�s alapj�n nem lehet d�nteni. 2001-et v�lasztj�k d�nto pillanatnak Having considered the arguments and evidence put forward by the Parties, the Court finds that the effectivit�s invoked by Honduras evidenced an �intention and will to act as sovereign� and constitute a modest but real display of authority over the four islands. Although it has not been established that the four islands are of economic or strategic importance and in spite of the scarcity of acts of State authority, Honduras has shown a sufficient overall pattern of conduct to demonstrate its intention to act as sovereign in respect of Bobel Cay, Savanna Cay, Port Royal Cay and South Cay. The Court further notes that those Honduran activities qualifying as effectivit�s which can be assumed to have come to the knowledge of Nicaragua did not elicit any protest on the part of the latter. With regard to Nicaragua, the Court has found no proof of intention or will to act as sovereign, and no proof of any actual exercise or display of authority over the islands. Nincs uti possidetis, vagy hagyom�nyos tengeri hat�r The most logical and widely practised approach is first to draw provisionally an equidistance line and then to consider whether that line must be adjusted in the light of the existence of special circumstances mondta m�r Quatar-Bahreinben It states that the use of a bisector ? the line formed by bisecting the angle created by thelinear approximations of coastlines ? has proved to be a viable substitute method in certaincircumstances where equidistance is not possible or appropriate. The justification for theapplication of the bisector method in maritime delimitation lies in the configuration of andrelationship between the relevant coastal fronts and the maritime areas to be delimited. In instanceswhere, as in the present case, any base points that could be determined by the Court are inherentlyunstable, the bisector method may be seen as an approximation of the equidistance method. Like equidistance, the bisector method is a geometrical approach that can be used to give legal effect tothe�criterion long held to be as equitable as it is simple, namely that in principle, while having regard to the special circumstances of the case, one should aim at an equal division of areas where the maritime projections of the coasts of the States . . .converge and overlap� Az �ltal�nos partvonalat vette alapul, arra �ll�tott egyenlo t�vols�g-egyenest Thus, a Honduran coastal front running to Punta Patuca and a Nicaraguan coastal front running to Wouhnta are in the Court�s view the relevant coasts for purposes of drawing the bisector. This resulting bisector line has an azimuth of 70� 14' 41.25".

19. Az eredeti ig�nyek �s az �t�let Torres Bernardez ad hoc b�r� szerint (Honduras) szerint nem igazs�gos mert 8 fokkal kedvezobb Nicaragu�nak, mint az k�z�pvonal lenneTorres Bernardez ad hoc b�r� szerint (Honduras) szerint nem igazs�gos mert 8 fokkal kedvezobb Nicaragu�nak, mint az k�z�pvonal lenne

20. A k�zelm�ltban befejezett peres �gyek (2010 tavasz�n)�gy Felek T�rgy Idopont D�nt�s Parra-Aranguren eg�szs�gi okokra hivatkozva kimentette mag�t (a sz�belit m�g meghallgatta de a d�nt�shozatalb�l kimaradt.) Buergenthal a m�sik � o feltehetoen �rdekelt volt valamelyik f�ln�l.Parra-Aranguren eg�szs�gi okokra hivatkozva kimentette mag�t (a sz�belit m�g meghallgatta de a d�nt�shozatalb�l kimaradt.) Buergenthal a m�sik � o feltehetoen �rdekelt volt valamelyik f�ln�l.

21. A b�r�k 15 b�r�, 9 �vre v�lasztj�k oket Az ENSZ K�zgyul�se �s Biztons�gi Tan�csa p�rhuzamosan, egym�st�l f�ggetlen�l v�lasztja oket. Jel�l�s�k: �llamok, de nem csak saj�t �llampolg�raikat. Politikai alkudoz�s. K�vetelm�nyek: legmagasabb b�r�i �ll�s bet�lt�s�re kvalifik�lts�g, vagy elismert jogtud�s mivolt (Stat�tum, 2. cikk) Kiz�r�s: ha kor�bban f�l k�pviseloje, �gyv�dje vagy tan�csad�ja. (17 (2) cikk) Eln�k, aleln�k: 3 �vre (2003 Shi, 2006 Higgins, 2009 Owada) A B�r�s�g �sszet�tele t�kr�zze a nagy kult�r�kat �s a vil�g fo jogrendszereit (9. cikk) Ad hoc b�r�: ha a f�lnek nincs �llampolg�ra a b�r�k k�r�ben. Nem felt�tlen�l saj�t �llampolg�rt v�lasztanak

22. A B�r�s�g �sszet�tele 2009 tavasz�n (a 2008 novemberi v�laszt�sokat k�vetoen) N�v Sz�l. �v Orsz�ga Elso megv�l. Megbiz lej�r Megj Ujrav�lasztott�k Jiuyong, SHI 1926 K�na 1994 2012 Abdul G. Koroma 1943 Sierra-Leone 1994 2012 Elhagyt�k a B�r�s�got Shigeru Oda 1924 Jap�n 1976 2003 Herczegh G�za 1929 Magyar-orsz�g 1993 2003 Manfred Lachs hely�re ker�lt be. 1994-ben �jra megv�lasztott�k Carl-August Fleischhauer 1930 N�met-orsz�g 1994 2003 �jonnan v�lasztott�k Hisashi Owada 1932 Jap�n 2003 2012 Bruno Simma 1941 N�meto. 2003 2012 Peter Tomka 1956 Szlov�kia 2003 2012 ___________________________________________________________________________ 2006 Ujrav�lasztott�k: Rosalin Higgins Elhagyta a B�r�s�got: Jos� Francisco Rezek 1944 Brazilia 1997 2006 Pieter J Koojmans 1933 Hollandia 1997 2006 Nabil Elaraby 1935 Egypt 2001 2006 Vladen V vereschchetin 1932 Oroszorsz�g 1995 2006 V�laszt�s: 2005 november 7. �j: Mohammed Bennouna 1943 Marokk� Kenneth Keith 1937 �j-Z�land Bernardo Sep�lveda Amor 1941 Mexik� Leonid Skotnikov 1951 Oroszorsz�g ______________________________________________________ While the Security Council also elected Mr. Yusuf (Somalia) in the first round, the General Assembly instead elected as the fifth member Ms.�Defensor-Santiage�( Philippines), who in the Council had received only 5 votes (8 being the required majority).�After the Republic of the Congo withdrew the candidacy of Sayeman Bula-Bula after the third ballot, Mr.�Yusuf could be elected in a fourth round of balloting against Miriam Defensor-Santiago ( Philippines) and Maurice Kamto (Cameroon). N�v Sz�l. �v Orsz�ga Elso megv�l. Megbiz lej�r Megj Ujrav�lasztott�k Jiuyong, SHI 1926 K�na 1994 2012 Abdul G. Koroma 1943 Sierra-Leone 1994 2012 Elhagyt�k a B�r�s�got Shigeru Oda 1924 Jap�n 1976 2003 Herczegh G�za 1929 Magyar-orsz�g 1993 2003 Manfred Lachs hely�re ker�lt be. 1994-ben �jra megv�lasztott�k Carl-August Fleischhauer 1930 N�met-orsz�g 1994 2003 �jonnan v�lasztott�k Hisashi Owada 1932 Jap�n 2003 2012 Bruno Simma 1941 N�meto. 2003 2012 Peter Tomka 1956 Szlov�kia 2003 2012 ___________________________________________________________________________ 2006 Ujrav�lasztott�k: Rosalin Higgins Elhagyta a B�r�s�got: Jos� Francisco Rezek 1944 Brazilia 1997 2006 Pieter J Koojmans 1933 Hollandia 1997 2006 Nabil Elaraby 1935 Egypt 2001 2006 Vladen V vereschchetin 1932 Oroszorsz�g 1995 2006 V�laszt�s: 2005 november 7. �j: Mohammed Bennouna 1943 Marokk� Kenneth Keith 1937 �j-Z�land Bernardo Sep�lveda Amor 1941 Mexik� Leonid Skotnikov 1951 Oroszorsz�g ______________________________________________________ While the Security Council also elected Mr. Yusuf (Somalia) in the first round, the General Assembly instead elected as the fifth member Ms.�Defensor-Santiage�( Philippines), who in the Council had received only 5 votes (8 being the required majority).�After the Republic of the Congo withdrew the candidacy of Sayeman Bula-Bula after the third ballot, Mr.�Yusuf could be elected in a fourth round of balloting against Miriam Defensor-Santiago ( Philippines) and Maurice Kamto (Cameroon).

23. Peres �gyek A felek Csak �llamok lehetnek. Joghat�s�g: (1) K�l�nmeg�llapod�s u.n. "compromis� alapj�n amelyben adott �gyet � adott k�rd�seket � a B�r�s�g el� bocs�tanak. (2) joghat�s�gi z�rad�k valamely szerzod�sben (3) al�vet�si nyilatkozat a Statutum 36 cikk�nek 2. bekezd�se szerint. Az ugyanilyent tevovel szemben az �tfed�s terjedelm�ig van joghat�s�g (2008: 66 �llam) (4) forum prorogatum � r�utal� magatart�ssal elfogad�s Australia���(22 March 2002) Austria���(19 May 1971) Barbados���(1 August 1980) Belgium���(17 June 1958) Botswana���(16 March 1970) Bulgaria���(21 June 1992) Cambodia���(19 September 1957) Cameroon���(3 March 1994) Canada���(10 May 1994) Costa Rica���(20 February 1973) Cote d'Ivoire���(29 September 2001) Cyprus���(3 September 2002) Democratic Republic of the Congo���(8 February 1989) Denmark���(10 December 1956) Djibouti���(2 September 2005) Dominica, Commonwealth of���(31 March 2006) Dominican Republic���(30 September 1924) Egypt���(22 July 1957) Estonia���(31 October 1991) Finland���(25 June 1958) Gambia���(22 June 1966) Georgia���(20 June 1995) Greece���(10 January 1994) Guinea, Republic of���(4 December 1998) Guinea-Bissau���(7 August 1989) Haiti���(4 October 1921) Honduras���(6 June 1986) Hungary���(22 October 1992) Australia���(22 March 2002) Austria���(19 May 1971) Barbados���(1 August 1980) Belgium���(17 June 1958) Botswana���(16 March 1970) Bulgaria���(21 June 1992) Cambodia���(19 September 1957) Cameroon���(3 March 1994) Canada���(10 May 1994) Costa Rica���(20 February 1973) Cote d'Ivoire���(29 September 2001) Cyprus���(3 September 2002) Democratic Republic of the Congo���(8 February 1989) Denmark���(10 December 1956) Djibouti���(2 September 2005) Dominica, Commonwealth of���(31 March 2006) Dominican Republic���(30 September 1924) Egypt���(22 July 1957) Estonia���(31 October 1991) Finland���(25 June 1958) Gambia���(22 June 1966) Georgia���(20 June 1995) Greece���(10 January 1994) Guinea, Republic of���(4 December 1998) Guinea-Bissau���(7 August 1989) Haiti���(4 October 1921) Honduras���(6 June 1986) Hungary���(22 October 1992)

24. A joghat�s�got elfogad� magyar nyilatkozat �s korl�tai �Nyilatkozat a h�gai Nemzetk�zi B�r�s�g k�telezo joghat�s�g�nak elismer�s�rol A Magyar K�zt�rsas�g ipso facto �s k�l�n meg�llapod�s n�lk�l, a viszonoss�g felt�tel�vel minden olyan �llammal szemben, amely ugyanezt a k�telezetts�get v�llalja, ezennel elismeri a h�gai Nemzetk�zi B�r�s�g k�telezo joghat�s�g�t a B�r�s�g Alapszab�lya 36. cikke (2) bekezd�s�vel �sszhangban valamennyi, a jelen Nyilatkozatot k�vetoen felmer�lo t�nyekbol vagy helyzetekbol eredo jogvita tekintet�ben, kiv�ve: a) azokat a jogvit�kat, amelyek eset�ben az abban r�szes felek a vita b�k�s rendez�s�nek m�s m�dj�ban �llapodtak meg vagy �llapodnak meg; b) azokat a jogvit�kat, amelyek a nemzetk�zi jog �rtelm�ben a Magyar K�zt�rsas�g kiz�r�lagos belso joghat�s�ga al� tartoznak; c) azokat a jogvit�kat, amelyek ellens�gesked�sekkel, h�bor�val, fegyveres �sszetuz�sekkel, egy�nileg vagy kollekt�ven gyakorolt �nv�delemmel, vagy az Egyes�lt Nemzetek hat�rozata vagy javaslata alapj�n t�rt�no feladat v�grehajt�s�val, vagy m�s hasonl�, a Magyar K�zt�rsas�got �rinto akci�val, int�zked�ssel vagy helyzettel jelenleg vagy a j�voben �sszef�ggenek; d) azokat a jogvit�kat, amelyek tekintet�ben a Nemzetk�zi B�r�s�g k�telezo joghat�s�g�t a vit�ban r�szes b�rmely f�l kiz�r�lag az adott jogvita tekintet�ben ismerte el, illetoleg, amelyek tekintet�ben a vit�ban r�szes b�rmely f�l a vit�nak a B�r�s�g el� t�rt�no utal�s�ra vonatkoz� k�relm�t a B�r�s�g k�telezo joghat�s�g�nak elismer�s�re vonatkoz� elfogad� nyilatkozat�t k�veto 12 h�nap eltelte elott tette meg. A Magyar K�zt�rsas�g Korm�nya fenntartja mag�nak a jogot, hogy az Egyes�lt Nemzetek fotitk�r�hoz int�zett �r�sbeli k�zl�s �tj�n 6 h�napos hat�lybal�p�si hat�ridot meg�llap�tva m�dos�tsa, kieg�sz�tse vagy visszavonja a fent eml�tett, vagy esetleg a k�sobbiekben teendo b�rmely fenntart�s�t. Ez a Nyilatkozat a megsz�ntet�s�re ir�nyul� k�zl�st k�veto 6 h�nappal hat�ly�t veszti.��Nyilatkozat a h�gai Nemzetk�zi B�r�s�g k�telezo joghat�s�g�nak elismer�s�rol A Magyar K�zt�rsas�g ipso facto �s k�l�n meg�llapod�s n�lk�l, a viszonoss�g felt�tel�vel minden olyan �llammal szemben, amely ugyanezt a k�telezetts�get v�llalja, ezennel elismeri a h�gai Nemzetk�zi B�r�s�g k�telezo joghat�s�g�t a B�r�s�g Alapszab�lya 36. cikke (2) bekezd�s�vel �sszhangban valamennyi, a jelen Nyilatkozatot k�vetoen felmer�lo t�nyekbol vagy helyzetekbol eredo jogvita tekintet�ben, kiv�ve: a) azokat a jogvit�kat, amelyek eset�ben az abban r�szes felek a vita b�k�s rendez�s�nek m�s m�dj�ban �llapodtak meg vagy �llapodnak meg; b) azokat a jogvit�kat, amelyek a nemzetk�zi jog �rtelm�ben a Magyar K�zt�rsas�g kiz�r�lagos belso joghat�s�ga al� tartoznak; c) azokat a jogvit�kat, amelyek ellens�gesked�sekkel, h�bor�val, fegyveres �sszetuz�sekkel, egy�nileg vagy kollekt�ven gyakorolt �nv�delemmel, vagy az Egyes�lt Nemzetek hat�rozata vagy javaslata alapj�n t�rt�no feladat v�grehajt�s�val, vagy m�s hasonl�, a Magyar K�zt�rsas�got �rinto akci�val, int�zked�ssel vagy helyzettel jelenleg vagy a j�voben �sszef�ggenek; d) azokat a jogvit�kat, amelyek tekintet�ben a Nemzetk�zi B�r�s�g k�telezo joghat�s�g�t a vit�ban r�szes b�rmely f�l kiz�r�lag az adott jogvita tekintet�ben ismerte el, illetoleg, amelyek tekintet�ben a vit�ban r�szes b�rmely f�l a vit�nak a B�r�s�g el� t�rt�no utal�s�ra vonatkoz� k�relm�t a B�r�s�g k�telezo joghat�s�g�nak elismer�s�re vonatkoz� elfogad� nyilatkozat�t k�veto 12 h�nap eltelte elott tette meg. A Magyar K�zt�rsas�g Korm�nya fenntartja mag�nak a jogot, hogy az Egyes�lt Nemzetek fotitk�r�hoz int�zett �r�sbeli k�zl�s �tj�n 6 h�napos hat�lybal�p�si hat�ridot meg�llap�tva m�dos�tsa, kieg�sz�tse vagy visszavonja a fent eml�tett, vagy esetleg a k�sobbiekben teendo b�rmely fenntart�s�t. Ez a Nyilatkozat a megsz�ntet�s�re ir�nyul� k�zl�st k�veto 6 h�nappal hat�ly�t veszti.�

25. Harmadik f�l bevon�sa �s annak korl�tai A Monetary gold �gy bonyolult, mert az 1943-ban a n�metek �ltal R�m�b�l elvitt alb�n arany sors�r�l sz�l. A k�rd�s az a N�metorsz�got megsz�ll� h�rom hatalom (US, UK, �s Fr) kinek szolg�ltassa ki: Alb�ni�nak, Olaszorsz�gnak (az alb�n �llamos�t�sok k�rt�r�t�sek�ppen) vagy UK-nak a Korfu szoros �gyben meg�t�lt k�rt�r�t�s fej�ben. Maga a felperes vonja k�ts�gbe, hogy a bs�g elj�rhat. (Az�rt ind�totta az �gyet, mert A Monetary gold �gy bonyolult, mert az 1943-ban a n�metek �ltal R�m�b�l elvitt alb�n arany sors�r�l sz�l. A k�rd�s az a N�metorsz�got megsz�ll� h�rom hatalom (US, UK, �s Fr) kinek szolg�ltassa ki: Alb�ni�nak, Olaszorsz�gnak (az alb�n �llamos�t�sok k�rt�r�t�sek�ppen) vagy UK-nak a Korfu szoros �gyben meg�t�lt k�rt�r�t�s fej�ben. Maga a felperes vonja k�ts�gbe, hogy a bs�g elj�rhat. (Az�rt ind�totta az �gyet, mert

26. Harmadik f�l beavatkoz�sa

27. Ideiglenes int�zked�s

28. Perg�tl� kifog�s: Of the 113 contentious cases, some have later been withdrawn. Ninety-seven judgments have been issued since 1946. Among those, 44 ? nearly half ? have required separate hearings on jurisdictional issues. Article 79 and decided to introduce a strict time-limit, requiring preliminary objections to be made �as soon as possible, and not later than three months after the delivery of the memorial� (Article 79 (1)). The three-month time-limit applies to all cases submitted to the Court after 1 February 2001. Rosalyn Higgin besz�de az ENSZ k�zgyul�se elott, 2008 okt 31 http://www.icj-cij.org/presscom/files/1/14841.pdf l�togatva 2009 �pr 17.Of the 113 contentious cases, some have later been withdrawn. Ninety-seven judgments have been issued since 1946. Among those, 44 ? nearly half ? have required separate hearings on jurisdictional issues. Article 79 and decided to introduce a strict time-limit, requiring preliminary objections to be made �as soon as possible, and not later than three months after the delivery of the memorial� (Article 79 (1)). The three-month time-limit applies to all cases submitted to the Court after 1 February 2001. Rosalyn Higgin besz�de az ENSZ k�zgyul�se elott, 2008 okt 31 http://www.icj-cij.org/presscom/files/1/14841.pdf l�togatva 2009 �pr 17.

29. Az elj�r�s �r�sbeli szakasz Kereset, ellenkereset, v�lasz, viszontv�lasz Sz�beli szakasz A meghallgat�s szerepe A B�r�s�g �t�letalkot�si gyakorlata � m�rlegel�s a sz�nfalak m�g�tt A k�zelm�ltbeli �practice directions� (�tmutat� a feleknek) c�lja az elj�r�s felgyors�t�sa

30. Fel�lvizsg�lat (Per�jrafelv�tel) �j, d�nto (meghat�roz�) jelentos�gu t�ny jutott valamelyik f�l tudom�s�ra, amely az �t�let meghozatala idej�n mind a B�r�s�g, mind a felek sz�m�ra ismeretlen volt. Az �t�let meghozatal�t k�veto 10 �ven bel�l, max. 6 h�nappal az �j t�ny felfedez�s�t k�vetoen lehet kezdem�nyezni. De: nem lehet, ha a f�l gondatlans�ga miatt nem ismerte meg a t�nyt

31. V�grehajt�s Stat�tum 59. Cikk: Az �t�let a felekre n�zve k�telezo (res iudicata). ENSZ Alapokm�ny 94. � (2): Ha az egyik f�l nem hajtja v�gre az �t�letbol fakad� k�telezetts�geit, a m�sik f�l a BT-hez fordulhat, amely aj�nl�st vagy hat�rozatot hoz

32. Tan�csad� v�lem�ny A tan�csad� v�lem�ny-k�r�si elj�r�s csak nemzetk�zi szervezeteknek �ll nyitva. Eddig 25 darab, 2010-ben 1 f�ggoben. Egyre kevesebbet k�rnek. Jelenleg csak az ENSZ 6 szerve �s 16 szakos�tott int�zm�nye k�rhet tan�csad� v�lem�nyt. K�rd�s: alkalmas eszk�z lehet-e a tan�csad� v�lem�ny a nemzetk�zi jog egys�g�nek a megorz�s�re? 2000.Es �vtized: 2 db. Fal, Koszovo 90-es 3 db ENSZ rapporteur immunit�sa, nukle�ris fegyver (2x) 80-as: 5 db WHO sz�khely, admin bs�g �t�let fel�lvizsglat, (2x), PLO �s a sz�khelyegyezm�ny, Mazilu eset (fogvatartott Un rapportuer)2000.Es �vtized: 2 db. Fal, Koszovo 90-es 3 db ENSZ rapporteur immunit�sa, nukle�ris fegyver (2x) 80-as: 5 db WHO sz�khely, admin bs�g �t�let fel�lvizsglat, (2x), PLO �s a sz�khelyegyezm�ny, Mazilu eset (fogvatartott Un rapportuer)

33. �rt�kel�s A B�r�s�ghoz kapcsol�d� (belso) V�vm�nyok: Feladatok probl�m�k 1. Sz�lesebb r�szv�tel, fejlettek, 1. T�bb forr�s kell fejlodok 2. T�bb a f�ggo �gy 2. �ramvonalas�tani a munkam�dszert 3. Jobb t�j�koztat�s (www.icj-cij.org) A B�r�s�g a nemzetk�zi kapcsolatokban V�vm�nyok, �rdemek Feladat 1. Fontos vit�kat megold, nyugv�pontra juttat 1. A B�r�s�gok elterjed�s�vel j�r� t�redezetts�g vesz�ly 2. M�lt�s�gteljes visszavonul�sra ad lehetos�get 3. �rtelmezi �s fejleszti a nemzetk�zi jogot 4. Bizony�tja, hogy a nemzetk�zi kapcsolatok egy r�sze �llhat a jog uralma alatt

34. K�sz�n�m a figyelm�ket!Nagy Boldizs�rwww.nagyboldizsar.hunagyboldi@ajk.elte.hu+36 1 2426313

35. F�ggel�k ��gyek a f�lm�ltb�l

36. A k�zelm�ltban befejezett peres �gyek (2010 tavasz�n) �gy Felek T�rgy Idopont D�nt�s Finds that the French Republic, by not giving the Republic of Djibouti the reasons for its refusal to execute the letter rogatory presented by the latter on 3 November 2004, failed to comply with its international obligation under Article 17 of the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the two Parties, signed in Djibouti on 27 September 1986, and that its finding of this violation constitutes appropriate satisfaction; ___________________ Malaysia states in its written pleadings that it �has an original title to Pulau Batu Puteh of long standing. Pulau Batu Puteh is, and has always been, part of the Malaysian State of Johor. Nothing has happened to displace Malaysia�s sovereignty over it. Singapore�s presence on the island for the sole purpose of constructing and maintaining a lighthouse there ? with the permission of the territorial sovereign ? is insufficient to vest sovereignty in it.� Malaysia further says that the island �could not at any relevant time be considered as terra nullius and hence susceptible to acquisition through occupation�. Singapore claims that �the selection of Pedra Branca as the site for building of the lighthouse with the authorization of the British Crown�, a process which started in 1847, �constituted a classic taking of possession � titre de souverain�. According to Singapore, title to the island was acquired by the British Crown in accordance with the legal principles of that time and has since �been maintained by the British Crown and its lawful successor, the Republic of Singapore� ____________________________.Finds that the French Republic, by not giving the Republic of Djibouti the reasons for its refusal to execute the letter rogatory presented by the latter on 3 November 2004, failed to comply with its international obligation under Article 17 of the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the two Parties, signed in Djibouti on 27 September 1986, and that its finding of this violation constitutes appropriate satisfaction; ___________________ Malaysia states in its written pleadings that it �has an original title to Pulau Batu Puteh of long standing. Pulau Batu Puteh is, and has always been, part of the Malaysian State of Johor. Nothing has happened to displace Malaysia�s sovereignty over it. Singapore�s presence on the island for the sole purpose of constructing and maintaining a lighthouse there ? with the permission of the territorial sovereign ? is insufficient to vest sovereignty in it.� Malaysia further says that the island �could not at any relevant time be considered as terra nullius and hence susceptible to acquisition through occupation�. Singapore claims that �the selection of Pedra Branca as the site for building of the lighthouse with the authorization of the British Crown�, a process which started in 1847, �constituted a classic taking of possession � titre de souverain�. According to Singapore, title to the island was acquired by the British Crown in accordance with the legal principles of that time and has since �been maintained by the British Crown and its lawful successor, the Republic of Singapore� ____________________________.

37. A k�zelm�ltban befejezett peres �gyek (2009 tavasz�n)�gy Felek T�rgy Idopont D�nt�s 26. In the original Applications instituting proceedings in this group of cases, Serbia and Montenegro invoked as the title of jurisdiction of the Court in each case Article IX of the Genocide Convention; in five cases it invoked its own acceptance of the jurisdiction of the Court under the optional clause of Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute, together with that of the respondent State; and in two of the cases, it also invoked a bilateral treaty between the respondent State concerned and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. The Applications of Serbia and Montenegro of 29 April 1999 asserted, at least by implication, that the Court was then open to Serbia and Montenegro, under Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Court�s Statute, on the basis that it was a Member of the United Nations and thus a party to the Court�s Statute, by virtue of Article 93, paragraph 1, of the Charter. Subsequently, this was in fact expressly stated in the Memorial filed by Serbia and Montenegro. 26. In the original Applications instituting proceedings in this group of cases, Serbia and Montenegro invoked as the title of jurisdiction of the Court in each case Article IX of the Genocide Convention; in five cases it invoked its own acceptance of the jurisdiction of the Court under the optional clause of Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute, together with that of the respondent State; and in two of the cases, it also invoked a bilateral treaty between the respondent State concerned and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia. The Applications of Serbia and Montenegro of 29 April 1999 asserted, at least by implication, that the Court was then open to Serbia and Montenegro, under Article 35, paragraph 1, of the Court�s Statute, on the basis that it was a Member of the United Nations and thus a party to the Court�s Statute, by virtue of Article 93, paragraph 1, of the Charter. Subsequently, this was in fact expressly stated in the Memorial filed by Serbia and Montenegro.