460 likes | 643 Views
Sulfur and oxygen isotopic tracers of past and present atmospheric chemistry. Becky Alexander Harvard University April 14, 2003. Overview. What controls atmospheric chemistry and why do we care? Stable isotope measurements: limitations and advantages
E N D
Sulfur and oxygen isotopic tracers of past and present atmospheric chemistry Becky Alexander Harvard University April 14, 2003
Overview • What controls atmospheric chemistry and why do we care? • Stable isotope measurements: limitations and advantages • Mass-independent fractionation in O and S isotopes (NO3- and SO42-) • Ice core sulfate and nitrate – past variations in atmospheric chemistry • Preliminary modeling “insights” • Summary and conclusions
Photochemistry Oxidation Primary Species Secondary Species Capacity H S, SO ,CH , CO, CO , H SO , HNO , 2 2 4 2 2 4 3 CO , NO, N O, RCOOH 2 2 particulates Deposition, Biosphere interaction The Atmospheric Reactor Climate Pollution Industry Volcanoes Marine Biomass Continental Biogenics burning Biogenics
NOx NOx HNO3 HNO3 O3, NO hu, O(1D) O2, H2O HO2 H2SO4 H2SO4 H2SO4 SOx SOx SOx Atmospheric Chemistry is controlled by atmospheric oxidants “The Earth’s oxidizing capacity” CH4 CO HC NOx O3 H2O2 OH
Models Coupled chemistry/climate global models Measurements Field studies Laboratory studies Global picture
Stable Isotope Measurements: Tracers of source strengths and chemical processing of atmospheric constituents (‰) = [(Rsample/Rstandard) – 1] 1000 R = minorX/majorX 18O: R = 18O/16O (CO2, CO, H2O, O2, O3, SO42-….) 34S: R = 34S/32S (SO2, SO42-, H2S)
Overlapping Source Signatures (‰) d 3 4 S - 2 0 - 10 + 10 +20 +30 Volcanic/Mineral CONTINENT Biogenic OCEAN Marine Biogenic Sea water COMBUSTION Coal Oil
Chemical isotopic fractionation • = d34SSO4/d34SSO2 • SO2 + OH SO4: a > 1.07 • (Luong et al., 2001) • SO2 + O3/H2O2 SO4: a = 1.0165 • (Eriksen, 1972) Oxidation of the heavier isotope is favored resulting in an increasing degree of 34S depletion at progressively later times
Mass-Dependent Fractionation d17O 0.5*d18O :D17O = d17O – 0.5*d18O = 0 d33S 0.5*d34S :D33S = d33S – 0.5*d34S = 0
O3 formation in the laboratory D17O Thiemens and Heidenreich, 1983 d17O/d18O 1 D17O = d17O – 0.5*d18O 0
16 16 16 17 or 18 16 16 Mass-independent isotope effects – symmetry explanation Symmetry C2v Symmetry Cs O2 + O(3P) O3* Vibrational States Rotational States Rotational States Vibrational States E v=i+1 v=i+1 v = i v = i De De
All D17O measurements in the atmosphere O3 strat. d17O 100 O3 trop. 75 CO2strat. 50 NO3 25 N2O 10 H2O2 CO 5 d18O SO4 10 20 50 100
Tropospheric oxidation The D17O of HNO3 depends also on the dilution factor due to the terminal reaction NO2 + OH HNO3 NO3 + RH HNO3 N2O5 + H2O(aq) 2HNO3 D17O of HNO3 a function of RO2/O3 and the terminal reaction D17O of NOx is a function of RO2/O3 oxidation
Tropospheric oxidation D17O of SO4 a function relative amounts of OH, H2O2, and O3 oxidation SO2 in isotopic equilibrium with H2O : No source effect: D17O of SO2 = 0 ‰ HSO3- + O3 D17O ~ 8.0 ‰, pH > 5.6 HSO3- + H2O2 D17O ~ 0.5 ‰, pH < 5.6 SO2 + OH D17O = 0 ‰ Aqueous Gas
Gas versus Aqueous-Phase Oxidation Aqueous-phase: SO2 + O3/H2O2 growth of existing aerosol particle Gas-phase: SO2 + OH new aerosol particle increased aerosol number concentrations Microphysical/optical properties of clouds Cloud albedo and climate
O3/H2O2 oxidation depends on pH of aqueous phase D17O Lee et al., 2001
[Na+] Estimated sulfate contribution from different sources in La Jolla, CA rainwater pH = 5.1 (average of La Jolla rainwater) D17O (SO4)aqueous = 1.82 ‰ D17O (SO4)actual = 0.75 ‰ Seasalt Aqueous Gas 30% 41% 29% Lee et al., 2001
Oxygen (D17O) relative oxidation pathways (oxidant chemistry)Gas/Aqueous phase chemistry climateRelative oxidation concentrations oxidation efficiency Sulfur (D33S) ?
SO2photolysis Volcanic sulfate in South Pole ice Continuum > 220nm • 1991 Pinatubo : • D33S = 0.7 ± 0.1 ‰ • 1259 Unknown: • D33S = -0.5 ± 0.1 ‰ • 1991 Cerro Hudson : • D33S = -0.1 ± 0.1 ‰ Sulfate Mass-fractionation line Residual SO2 Savarino et al., 2002 Farquhar et al., 2001 Non-zero D33S stratospheric influence
Conservative Tracers in Ice cores: Na+ NO3- SO42- Composition of gas bubbles SO42- very stable (d34S) sources of sulfate (D33S) stratospheric influence (D17O) aqueous v. gas phase oxidation (D17O) oxidant concentrations oxidation capacity of the atmosphere
Current knowledge of the past oxidative capacity of the atmosphere Model results (vs Pre Indus. Holocene) Conflicting results on OH, highly dependent on emission scenarios of NMHC, NOx which are not very well constrained
Current knowledge of the past oxidative capacity of the atmosphere Measurement approach Doubling of O3 between PIT/IT 50 % increase of H2O2 between PIT/IT Sigg & Neftel, 1991 Voltz & Kley, 1988 Summit Dye 3 But calibration issue, not representative of global conditions, or stability in proxy records.
Antarctica Greenland Sulfate concentration reflects anthropogenic emissions Sulfate concentration varies with climate
Analytical Procedure Old method BaSO4 + C CO2 CO2 + BrF5 O2 (3 days of chemistry, 10 mmol sulfate) New method Ag2SO4 O2 + SO2 (minutes of chemistry, 1-2 mmol sulfate) Faster, smaller sample sizes, O and S isotopes in same sample
Vostok, Antarctica Ice Core [SO42-] tracks [MSA-] suggesting a predominant DMS (oceanic biogenic) source
Vostok Ice Core – Climatic D17O (SO4) fluctuations DTs data: Kuffey and Vimeux, 2001, Vimeux et al., 2002
Extended 3-isotope plot 100% O3 oxidation: D17O (SO4) = ¼ * 32‰ = 7.5‰ 100% OH oxidation: D17O (SO4) = 0 ‰ 100% H2O2 oxidation: D17O(SO4) = ½*1‰ = 0.5 ‰ D17O range = 1.3 – 4.8 ‰
Results of calculations OH (gas-phase) oxidation relatively greater in glacial period
GCM sensitivity studies What can cause this climate variation? • Stratospheric influence? NO D33S = 0 for all Vostok samples • Changes in oxidant concentrations in the atmosphere? • Oxidation capacity of the atmosphere • Changes in cloud processing/liquid water content? • Cloud/water content of the atmosphere
Sulfur oxidation pathways have a natural variation on the glacial/interglacial timescale. Do we see a variation as a result of anthropogenic activities?
Sulfate and nitrate in Greenland ice cores Fossil fuel burning trends from Graedel and Crutzen, “Atmospheric Change”. Mayewski et al., 1990
Site A NO3- Site A SO42-
Pre-Industrial Biomass Burning Fire index data: Savarino and Legrand, 1998
Biomass burning can affect D17O of sulfate and nitrate by: • Altering oxidant (O3) concentrations • Increase aerosol loading affecting heterogeneous oxidation pathways Are D17O measurements of sulfate/nitrate proxies of: Oxidation capacity? Aerosol concentrations?
Resolving D17O sulfate in GEOS-CHEM Resolve sulfate sources: SO2 + OH SO4A HSO3- + H2O2 SO4B SO32- + O3 SO4C primary sulfate = SO4D (currently direct anthropogenic emissions) D17O = (1*0.5*SO4B + 32*0.25*SO4C)/ (SO4A + SO4B + SO4C + SO4D)
Oxidation by O3 only important during winter in high northern latitudes D17O > 1 O3 oxidation
D17O sulfate versus cloud processing D17O Cloud liquid water content
D17O sulfate versus O3 concentration D17O O3 ppbv
D17O sulfate versus H2O2 concentration D17O sulfate versus OH concentration
D17O versus H2O2 : January D17O H2O2 ppbv
D17O of sulfate is strongly affected by (oxidant) H2O2 concentrations Less so by cloud content Importance of oxidation by O3 is not represented Aqueous-phase oxidation occurs in clouds only (pH = 4.5) Aqueous oxidation occurs on deliquescent sea-salt aerosols (initial pH=8, large buffering capacity)
Oxidation on sea-salt aerosols Sea salt flux to atmosphere: 1.01 x 104 Tg/year 11.1 Tg(S)/year (Gong et al., 2002) Global DMS emissions: 15-25 Tg(S)/year (Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998) 44 -74% of SO2 (from DMS) oxidized to sulfate by O3 on sea-salt aerosols
Conclusions and Future Directions • D17O measurements of both sulfate and nitrate reflect variations in : • Changes in the oxidation capacity Potential buildup of pollutants • Changes in aerosol/cloud properties Climate change Model sensitivity studies can determine the importance of each on D17O Simulation of heterogeneous chemistry must be improved in GCMs “current” D17O measurements
Acknowledgements Prof. Mark Thiemens – UCSD Dr. Joël Savarino – CNRS/LGGE Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l'Environnement (LGGE) The National Ice Core Laboratory (USGS) Prof. Daniel Jacob – Harvard Dr. Rokjin Park – Harvard Bob Yantosca - Harvard