170 likes | 306 Views
The Politics of United States Foreign Policy Chapter 5. Bureaucratic politics issues and why they are important. agencies are supposed to perform separate but interrelated fp functions which are then supposed to be coordinated through the National Security Council and by the President.
E N D
Bureaucratic politics issues and why they are important • agencies are supposed to perform separate but interrelated fp functions which are then supposed to be coordinated through the National Security Council and by the President. • relative influence of these competing agencies has changed over time. • there has been the emergence of numerous new agencies on fp making scene
The Bureaucracy • Hierarchy • Specialization • Routinization
The Bureaucracy: How its studied • Historical context • Functions • Structure • Subculture
Bureaucratic Model of Decision-Making • interactions among different government organization • bargaining process results in decisions • results in power plays and competition • where you stand is where you sit: individuals represent preferences of bureaucracies • therefore assumes: • agencies with competing interests are involved in decision-making process • agencies bargain for outcomes • recognizes wide-range of possible conflicts among agencies with authority over some aspect of foreign policy • used when personal preferences not taken into account and bargaining process is effective
Historical Context of the Bureaucracy • Pre-WWII: apex of the state department • Post WWII: decline • Importance of international affairs • Rise of U.S. power • Global communications revolution • Use of force as a favored policy tool • Importance of international economics
State Department - Structure • pyramidal structure • Secretary of State at the top • three major agencies • five undersecretaries • secretary, undersecretaries, and assistant secretary are political jobs/appointments that must be approved by Congress • representation in most of 185 nations/entities that are members of United Nations • Ambassadors are head of embassies abroad
State Department Subculture • bright, talented apt people • snobbish, elitist • hostile to outsiders • anti-academic • elite East coast colleges and universities • generalists • believes they are the repository of foreign policy knowledge and resents new presidents and administrators that try to tell them what to do • therefore will sometimes fail to implement directives of White House and choose to carry out its own policy • has not come to grips with changes in fp like pluralism, democratization, and public opinion • Foreign Affairs Training Center does not do adequate job preparing foreign service officers for missions abroad
Subculture of the State Department • Five perceived characteristics: • Elitist or exclusivist • Preference for overseas appointments, identify • Emphasis on diplomacy and negotiation • Generalists • Loyal and cautious
Functions of the State Department • Represent U.S. government abroad • Express the views of foreign governments • Diplomacy • Analyze and report • Policy advice
Structure of the State Department:Foggy Bottom • Size/Composition • Hierarchy: • Secretary of State • Deputy secretary of state • Undersecretaries • Bureau: assistant secretaries and deputy assistant secretaries • Geographic • Issue oriented
Structure of the State Department:embassies and consular posts • Ambassador • Deputy chief of mission • Country Team • Others
Structure of the State Department:patterns • Hierarchy • Complex policy process • Issue-based • Personnel: Insider’s versus outsiders • Political appointments • Career FSO’s
The State’s weaknesses • Perceptions and behaviors • Example: Future of Iraq Project • Defense department v. State
State’s strength: individuals • Secretaries of State • Insider-outsider dilemma • Examples: Powell and Rice
Public diplomacy • USIA BBG, Department of state • Media, information • Voice of America, etc. • Public diplomacy and culture • Exchange programs
USAID • Agency for International Development (1961) • In Department of state (1998) • Budget • 7 core strategic goals