360 likes | 551 Views
Injection and extraction region transfer lines, new TT10 and TT11 switch. C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi PS2 meeting 25.06.2009. Thanks to: W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, J. Uythoven. Overall Layout. based on PS2 version from 17. Dec. 2008. Beam Line Overview. TTL1 (Update).
E N D
Injection and extraction region transfer lines, new TT10 and TT11 switch C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi PS2 meeting 25.06.2009 Thanks to: W. Bartmann, M. Benedikt, J. Uythoven
Overall Layout based on PS2 version from 17. Dec. 2008 C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
Beam Line Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TTL1 (Update) Based on the new TT11 design (with emittance exchange section) with the following consequences: • PS2 closer to TI 2, further away from TT10 • TTL1: shorter length, larger bending angles • larger slope of 8.1%, more bending magnets needed • first part of TTL1 still compatible with HP-SPL, second part only compatible with LP-SPL @ 4 GeV • second part can be compatible with LP-SPL @ 5 GeV if 7.2 m (instead of 5.75 m) long dipoles are used C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TTL1: Optics Simulations C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TTL1: Optics Simulations C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TTL1: Aperture Calculation beam envelope x, y (m) s (m) N = 6co = 5 mm beam envelope: C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT10 (Fast Injection) • New part starts at QID1015 of present TT10 • FODO lattice with 90° phase advance per cell and 30 m cell length • Dispersion suppressor scheme to avoid creation of additional dispersion (in addition to the existing large dispersion values in TT10) • Matching sections at the start and the end of the line • Using the same magnet types as in TT10 C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT10: Optics Simulations C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT10: Optics Simulations C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT10: Aperture Calculation beam envelope x, y (m) s (m) N = 6co = 5 mm beam envelope: C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT11 (Update) • Based on the version presented by M. Meddahi at the PS2 meeting on 16.04.2009: • Fodo lattice with 21 m cell length and 90° phase advance/cell • Emittance exchange section between 2 achromats • Changed position of some bending magnets and a quadrupole to avoid interference with other magnets at the PS2 extraction region C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT11: Optics Simulations w/o emittance exchange C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT11: Optics Simulations w/o emittance exchange C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT11: Aperture Calculation 20 GeV w/o emittance exchange beam envelope x, y (m) s (m) N = 6co = 5 mm beam envelope: C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT11: Optics Simulations w/ emittance exchange C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT11: Optics Simulations w/ emittance exchange C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
Beam Line to Experimental Area (TTEA) • Branches off TT11 using MBS-like switching magnets • Fodo lattice with 90° phase advance per cell and 26.25 m cell length • Dispersion suppressor scheme • Using same magnet types as in TT11 • Design covers only first part of the beam line C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TTEA: Optics Simulations C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TTEA: Optics Simulations C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TTEA: Aperture Calculation 20 GeV beam envelope x, y (m) s (m) N = 6co = 5 mm beam envelope: C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
Injection and Extraction Region C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
Fast Injection Region C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
Fast Injection Region Detail C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
H- Injection and Extraction Region C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
Injection Chicane Detail C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
Special Quadrupoles C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TD1 Branch Off C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT10/TT11/TD1 Crossings C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TTEA Branch Off C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TTEA Branch Off Detail C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TTL1 Draft Magnet Specifications * using former LEP dipole cores C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT10 Draft Magnet Specifications C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TT11 Draft Magnet Specifications C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
TTEA Draft Magnet Specifications C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi
Conclusion • TTL1 no major issues - details of space charge effects to be interated. • TT10 - large aperture required for new quads (and possibly upgrade for some existing ones). • TD1 - feasible to transfer beam to H0/H- dump. • TT11 - version with emittance exchange possible IF present extraction-before-injection layout maintained. • Coil windows and beam passage in doublet quadrupoles not obvious - design checks needed. • Injected/extracted beams crossing in TT12.MQF9 looks feasible - to check in detail • Special magnet types will include some C-dipoles for beamlines near the PS2, e.g. MBIH.H1.1 in TD1, TT12.MB.8.D.1 in TT11, etc • If emittance exchange NOT needed in TT11 and slow extracion NOT needed in LSS1, can simplify the layout considerably. C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi