370 likes | 516 Views
NETWORK PLANNING TASK FORCE. STRATEGY SESSION AUGUST 11, 2008 UNIFIED COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS PROPOSED WIRELESS GUEST IP FUNDING MODEL. NPTF Meeting dates. February 18-Operational review (Completed) April 21- Security strategy session (Completed)
E N D
NETWORK PLANNING TASK FORCE STRATEGY SESSION AUGUST 11, 2008 UNIFIED COMMUNICATIONS WIRELESS PROPOSED WIRELESS GUEST IP FUNDING MODEL
NPTF Meeting dates • February 18-Operational review (Completed) • April 21- Security strategy session (Completed) • July 21-Updates & planning discussions (Completed) • August 11- Strategy discussions • September 15- Security strategy discussion • October 6- Strategy discussions/preliminary rates (ADDED) • October 20- Strategy discussion • November 3- FY’10 Finalize rate setting
NPTF Fall Meeting Topics • September 15 (Dave Millar) • Security Strategy Discussion • October 6 (Deke, Mark, Mike) • Intrusion detection • Perimeter (Next Generation Arbor) • Local ID • NGP update-buildings with dual feed and single-mode fiber • NGP discussion-buildings planned for dual feed and single-mode fiber • Preliminary rates • October 20 (Jim Choate) • Strong Authentication • Central authorization • Secure file transfer • November 3 (Mike) • Finalize rate setting
Unified Communications Update bringing many modes of communications together
Agenda • Overview • Update on Email • Update on IM • Update on Voice over IP
Communicating Today • We accept artificial barriers in our communication. Oddly, we think of it as natural. • Faxes are sent between two people, each with a fax machine. • Telephone calls are made between two people using telephones. • Email is sent from one person on a computer to another. • We even spend time communicating about communicating • Calling each other to arrange to send a fax • Sending email to set up a conference call • Instant messaging to set up a phone call, etc.
Unified Communications • Unified Communications is the idea that the dividing lines may fade and even disappear. • By bringing together many forms of communication, we can communicate naturally and efficiently • Unified communications allows us to • Send email to another person’s fax machine • Have phone calls using PDAs or laptop computers • Move a conversation seamlessly from Instant Messaging to a phone call to a video conference on personal computers or high function handhelds
Many communications media Email Phone Vid Conf & Other Fax IM
Communications Unified Email Voice Presence Vid Conf & Other Fax IM Communications tools linked to each other, and influenced by “Presence”.
Update on Email and IM • Exchange • Zimbra • Jabber
Exchange • In production since July 2007 • 10 servers comprising the Exchange service • Site replicated in Levy and Nichols campus data centers • 2,759 users, with over 480 using handheld devices • Default user quota size is 250 MB (about 700 users have purchased higher disk quotas)
Exchange Service Features • Email, Calendar and Tasks in a unified interface through Outlook, Entourage and Outlook Web Access (Webmail) • POP and IMAP access for Penn’s supported mail clients • Flexible addressing (user@domain.upenn.edu, user@upenn.edu) • Mobile device support for Blackberry and ActiveSync • 250 MB base quota, with upgrades available to 1.75 GB • Account Management for LSP access to account creation, quota changes, Blackberry provisioning, account status query, etc.
Zimbra • A Replacement for the Pobox Classic service • Modern, open standards-based collaboration suite • Rolled out end of July 2008 • 8 servers comprising the Zimbra service • Site replicated in Levy and ModV campus NAPs • Soon 15,000 customers, many handheld devices • Default user quota size is 250 MB
Zimbra Service Features • Email, Calendar, Tasks and more in a unified web interface • POP and IMAP access for Penn’s supported mail clients • Calendar access via web, and through Mozilla and Apple tools • Flexible addressing (user@domain.upenn.edu, user@upenn.edu) • Mobile device support for major handhelds • 250 MB base quota, with upgrades available to 1.75 GB • Low price point of Pobox • Zimbra and Exchange will share calendar “free/busy” time by end of CY2008.
Update on Instant Messaging • Penn operated IM service with local addressing • Based on open standard xmpp/jabber protocol • Identity assurance using PennKey • Data path and data storage protection and policy • Clients for MacOS and Windows. All can connect to both campus Jabber servers and commodity services like AIM and Yahoo Messenger • Pilot service ran for over a year • In production as of July 2008
Update on Voice over IP • VoIP overview • Verizon HIPC evaluation • Current PennNet Phone Deployments • Recent developments with PennNet Phone • Future PennNet Phone development plans
VoIP Overview • VoIP in worldwide communications • Major player in Long Distance / IXC service • Retail services like Vonage • SIP trunking services to enterprises • Enterprise VoIP options • Cisco Call Manager • Avaya and other vendor solutions • IP Centrex (such as Verizon HIPC) • Open source VoIP
Verizon Hosted IP Centrex • “Hosted” (not “managed”) service in Verizon Network • Uses feature-rich Broadworks software • Local phone provisioning and configuration management handled by enterprise • Back-end handled by Verizon • Verizon has only small deployments to date • Penn had a very mixed experience in a 90 day trial • Many good features • Others did not work as advertised or at all • Long delays to get phones into service • Some unexplained outages • Not a “full outsourced” solution. Penn would still have significant costs and responsibilities • Over a year of joint development necessary before we could roll it out widely on campus. • Decision made to stay with PennNet Phone only for now.
PennNet Phone Today • Production-grade, enterprise VoIP Services • Redundant servers, gateways and PRIs • 24x365 monitoring and management • Single-line features, email/voicemail integration • 911 support equal to traditional system • Location information able to be updated via web • Roughly 1,500 VoIP phones in full production • More than 80 LSPs involved today
Features and Issues Web Pages Current Features: www.upenn.edu/computing/voice/voip/features/ Known Issues: www.upenn.edu/computing/voice/voip/lsp/known_issues.html Planned Features: www.upenn.edu/computing/voice/voip/features/planned_features.html
Recent Fixes and Coming Feature Releases • Recently fixed a long-standing Consultative Call Transfer problem • Currently in test/pilot • Call Hunting • Forward on ring-no-answer • Forward on busy • Planned Feature Release • Bridged Line Appearance with Busy Indicator • Find me/Follow me • Set Ring Delay before voicemail • Direct transfer to voice mailbox
Voicemail • PennNet Phone uses the popular voicemail service from Digium • Asterisk is an open source project. Penn has contributed code to the project to implement many features important to our users • A very basic version is in use today with PennNet Phone (about 1500 users) • A more feature rich version is available to pilot users (about 150 users) • An advanced version is in internal testing, with a very large set of Octel features. • Full unified messaging has been developed. When you listen to your new voicemail through your e-mail client, your message waiting indicator will turn off!
Telephony at Penn Going Forward • Centrex remains the primary telephony service to thousands of campus customers today • PennNet Phone is the direction forward for flexibility, application integration and ultimately for cost management • The transition will take place over several years
VoIP Handsets, Today and Tomorrow • Cisco 7940 and 7960 phones today • Polycom 320, 550, 650 and 4000 coming Cisco 7940 Polycom 320 Polycom 4000 Polycom 550 and 650
Phone (Roadmap) • Next generation PennNet phone program resumes November 2008 • ISC recommends to upgrade existing Cisco phones with Polycom phones • Larger rollout planned for January 2009 • Lunch-time learning sessions planned for LSP(s); moving forward quarterly sessions offered to communicate feature updates
ISC Telecommunications (PennNet Phone) http://www.upenn.edu/computing/voice/
ISC Telecommunications (PennNet Phone) Polycom Features
ISC Telecommunications Support Traditional Telephone and Voice Mail Service • e-mail service-requests@isc.upenn.edu or call (215) 746-6000 PennNet Phone and Voice Mail Service (Consult your Local Support Provider) • http://www.upenn.edu/computing/voice/lsp/index.html • ISC Provider Desk http://www.upenn.edu/computing/prodesk/
Wireless Update • Current Status • Wireless-PennNet Retirement on 06/30. Saved $180k/year. • AirPennNet-Guest Network Operational July 1, 2008 • Still designing and planning subnet IP ranges to provide scalability and management • NOC will work with LSP’s to set IP ranges for AirPennNet and AirPennNet-Guest Networks • Consolidation of all Wireless Networks • AirPennNet expansion (SAS and SEAS buildings) • SAS work is complete for both AirPennNet and AirPennNet-Guest; AirSAS SSID retirement week of 08/18/2008 • SEAS has AirPennNet configured but still need to add AirPennNet-Guest (by end of August) • Total AP Count in Production: about 1300 • Recent Wireless Expansion Projects (Vet, NEB & Dental) • VET – AirPennNet-Guest has been added to NBC as of 08/04/2008 • Dental Wireless covers 100% of their complex (space planned for renovations) • Nursing at 50% with 90+% intended coverage once renovations are completed within their construction schedule.
Wireless Update • Short Term Strategy • Enhance AirPennNet website to provide more information about the service • Coverage maps, FAQ, Technical information • Normal/standard operating mode in FY2009 • Continue with wireless expansion per customer demand • Make no major changes or hardware upgrades to the current wireless infrastructure • Project to Evaluate Next Generation WLAN • Testing new controller-based architecture, 802.11n, and capabilities for real time applications over wireless. • RFP drafted and submitted to 3 vendors (Cisco, Meru, Aruba) • Review Responses in Early Fall • Evaluations ending by end fall. • Vendor selection by 01/2009 • Small Pilot (entire building) by 3Q FY2009 • Purchase by end FY2009 for FY2010 deployment • Design of Campus User Rapid/Self Service to Enable Guest Access • Early stages of discussion • Targeting end of FY2009 Pilot
Next Generation 802.11 Wireless • 802.11b – first deployed at Penn in 2000-2001 • 11 Mb/sec data rate, 2.4 GHz spectrum • 802.11a – first deployed at Penn in 2004-2005 • 54 Mb/sec data rate, alternate radio spectrum • 802.11g – first deployed at Penn in 2004-2005 • 54 Mb/sec data rate, 2.4 GHz spectrum • “backwards compatible” with 802.11b • 802.11n to be deployed at Penn in 2009 • Higher data rates • over 100 Mb/sec possible in 2.4 GHz • over 300 Mb/sec possible in 5 GHz • Much improved multi path handling
New Wireless Architectures • Possible controller based solution: • Streamline management – installations, configurations, radio & power management • Cell based architectures may help with client roaming decisions (less dropped connections) • Secure fast roaming (roaming from one AP to another is handled per building and not autonomously) • May also help with real time application performance
Proposed Wireless Guest IP Funding Model • Goal : To enable proper IP ranges for AirPennNet and AirPennNet-Guest, and to ensure use of AirPennNet as primary wireless network • Key Concepts: • AirPennNet is strongly recommended as primary wireless network for Penn faculty, staff, and students (security, speed, and availability) • AirPennNet-Guest was designed for visitors and for devices incapable of supporting 802.1x. (network has restrictions and is less secure) • Policy: Previous Wireless-PennNet policies allowed for some centrally subsidized IP addresses for public areas. AirPennNet-Guest allows for visitors to roam to all areas of campus. Two ranges of IP addresses for AirPennNet & AirPennNet-Guest make it difficult to manage the IP ranges (i.e. costs) to a minimum. • Propose that 10% of IP range for AirPennNet networks be subsidized for IP range in AirPennNet-Guest networks. Schools or centers will pay for IP costs greater than 10% of AirPennNet IP range.
Proposed Wireless Guest IP Funding Model • Cost impact to CSF FY’09 • 4041 IP’s assigned for Wireless-PennNet in FY’08. • 10% cost of those IP’s equals 404 * $4.29 * 12 = $20,798 per year. • Costs would be absorbed by ISC in FY’09 • Potential cost impact to CSF FY’10 • 8000 IP’s assigned for AirPennNet projected • 10% cost of those IP’s equals 800 * $1.67 * 12 = $16,032 per year. • This cost could be added to the CSF for FY’10.