1 / 32

GDE: Progress Report

This report outlines the achievements, future goals, and organizational structure of the Global Design Effort (GDE) for the International Linear Collider (ILC). It covers the development of a detailed design concept, international costing, and detector concepts. The report also highlights the coordination of R&D efforts, decision-making processes, and the transition towards the Reference Design Report (RDR). The GDE's collaboration with various global entities and the importance of establishing a sound design with affordable costing are emphasized. Additionally, key decision-makers and new GDE members are introduced.

khumphrey
Download Presentation

GDE: Progress Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Barry Barish ILCSC Report CERN 9-Feb-06 GDE: Progress Report

  2. Global Design Effort • The Mission of the GDE • Produce a design for the ILC that includes a detailed design concept, performance assessments, reliable international costing, an industrialization plan , siting analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope. • Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.) GDE Report to ILCSC

  3. The GDE after ~6 Months • How have we done? • We are on track – BCD produced by end of 2005 as promised. It will provide a sound basis for entering into a reference design effort, globally coordinate R&D program, begin industrialization, determine costs, etc. next year • What’s Next? • Undertaking Design/Cost effort toward Reference Design Report (RDR) • Assessing present R&D program to begin to provide global guidance in the future. GDE Report to ILCSC

  4. Baseline Configuration Document • Our ‘Deliverable’ by the end of 2005 • A structured electronic document • Documentation (reports, drawings etc) • Technical specs. • Parameter tables GDE Report to ILCSC

  5. Structure of the BCD Summary-like overview for those who want to understand the choice and the why Technical documentation of the baseline, for engineers and acc. phys. making studies towards RDR GDE Report to ILCSC

  6. Alternatives Section(s) NoteACD is part of the BCD GDE Report to ILCSC

  7. The Key Decisions Critical choices: luminosity parameters & gradient GDE Report to ILCSC

  8. Making Choices – The Tradeoffs Many decisions are interrelated and require input from several WG/GG groups GDE Report to ILCSC

  9. From Snowmass to a Baseline 2005 Snowmass August September October November December WW/GG summaries Response to list of 40+ decisions All documented ‘recommendations available on ILC Website (request community feedback) Review by BCD EC BCD EC publishes‘strawman’ BCD BCD Executive Committee: BarishDugan, Foster, Takasaki Raubenheimer, Yokoya, Walker Public Review Frascati GDE meeting GDE Report to ILCSC

  10. GDE Frascati – The BCD Approved • December 2005 • Finished the BCD • Organized the GDE and the broader R&D and Design efforts for next year BCD http://www.linearcollider.org/ GDE Report to ILCSC

  11. General Layout Plan 500 Gev GDE Report to ILCSC

  12. Next Goal – Reference Design • Reorganized the GDE toward Design / Cost Effort • A global effort to design / cost the ILC is underway and working • Configuration Control; International Costing; Industrialization; Siting -------------------------- • A sound design must be established with convincing and affordable costing. • Global R&D program to demonstrate the ILC, improve over the baseline and reduce costs. GDE Report to ILCSC

  13. GDE RDR / R&D Organization FALC ICFA FALC Resource Board ILCSC GDE Directorate GDE Executive Committee GDE R & D Board GDE Change Control Board GDE Design Cost Board Global R&D Program RDR Design Matrix GDE Report to ILCSC

  14. GDE RDR / R&D Organization FALC ICFA Reporting FALC Resource Board ILCSC technical resources GDE Directorate GDE Executive Committee GDE R & D Board GDE Change Control Board GDE Design Cost Board Global R&D Program RDR Design Matrix GDE Report to ILCSC

  15. GDE RDR / R&D Organization FALC ICFA FALC Resource Board ILCSC GDE Directorate GDE GDE Executive Committee GDE R & D Board GDE Change Control Board GDE Design Cost Board Global R&D Program RDR Design Matrix GDE Report to ILCSC

  16. Chris Adolphsen, SLAC Jean-Luc Baldy, CERN Philip Bambade, LAL, Orsay Barry Barish, Caltech Wilhelm Bialowons, DESY Grahame Blair, Royal Holloway Jim Brau, University of Oregon Karsten Buesser, DESY Elizabeth Clements, Fermilab Michael Danilov, ITEP Jean-Pierre Delahaye, CERN, Gerald Dugan, Cornell University Atsushi Enomoto, KEK Brian Foster, Oxford University Warren Funk, JLAB Jie Gao, IHEP Terry Garvey, LAL-IN2P3 Hitoshi Hayano, KEK Tom Himel, SLAC Bob Kephart, Fermilab Eun San Kim, Pohang Acc Lab Hyoung Suk Kim, Kyungpook Nat’l Univ Shane Koscielniak, TRIUMF Vic Kuchler, Fermilab Lutz Lilje, DESY Tom Markiewicz, SLAC David Miller, Univ College of London Shekhar Mishra, Fermilab Youhei Morita, KEK Alex Mueller, LAL - Orsay Hasan Padamsee, Cornell University Carlo Pagani, DESY Nan Phinney, SLAC Dieter Proch, DESY Pantaleo Raimondi, INFN Tor Raubenheimer, SLAC Francois Richard, LAL-IN2P3 Perrine Royole-Degieux, GDE/LAL Kenji Saito, KEK Daniel Schulte, CERN Tetsuo Shidara, KEK Sasha Skrinsky, Budker Institute Fumihiko Takasaki, KEK Laurent Jean Tavian, CERN Nobu Toge, KEK Nick Walker, DESY Andy Wolski, LBL Hitoshi Yamamoto, Tohoku Univ Kaoru Yokoya, KEK 49 members GDE Members New Members Marc Ross (SLAC) Bill Willis (Columbia) Andre Seryi (SLAC) John Sheppard (SLAC) Ewan Patterson (SLAC) Peter Garbincius (Fermilab) Maseo Kuriki (KEK) Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK) Nobuhiro Terunuma (KEK) Norihito Ohuchi (KEK) Susanna Guiducci (INFN) Deepa Angal-Kalinin (CCLRC) Totals Americas 22 Europe 23 Asia 16 GDE Report to ILCSC

  17. GDE Structure and Organization • Executive Committee for Baseline Configuration • GDE Director • Barish • Regional Directors • Dugan – Americas • Foster – Europe • Takasaki – Asia • Accelerator Leaders • Yokoya - Asia • Raubenheimer - Americas • Walker - Europe • Responsible for decisions and documentation for the Baseline Configuration Document (BCD) and RDR GDE Executive Committee GDE Report to ILCSC

  18. GDE Structure and Organization • GDE Groups • Design / Cost Engineers • Shidara – Asia • Bialowons – Europe • Garbincius – Americas • Siting, Civil Construction and Infrastructure • Baldy - Europe • Enomoto – Asia • Kuchler – Amercas • Physics / Detectors (WWS chairs) • Brau - Americas • Richard - Europe • Yamamoto - Asia • Accelerator Experts (44 GDE members) GDE Report to ILCSC

  19. GDE Organizational Evolution for RDR • Selected additions to the GDE following the BCD completion having needed skills in design, engineering, costing, etc • Change Control Board • The baseline will be put under configuration control and a Board with a single chair will be created with needed expertise. • Design / Cost Board • A GDE Board with single chair will be established to coordinate the reference design effort, including coordinating the overall model for implementing the baseline ILC, coordinating the design tasks, costing, etc. • R&D Board • A GDE Board will be created to evaluate, prioritize and coordinate the R&D program in support of the baseline and alternatives with a single chair GDE Report to ILCSC

  20. Change Control Board (CCB) Nobu Toge (chair) GDE Report to ILCSC

  21. Design Cost Board (DCB) Peter Garbincius (chair) GDE Report to ILCSC

  22. Global R&D Board (RDB) Bill Willis (chair) GDE Report to ILCSC

  23. Approach to ILC R&D Program • Proposal-driven R&D in support of the baseline design. • Technical developments, demonstration experiments, industrialization, etc. • Proposal-driven R&D in support of alternatives to the baseline • Proposals for potential improvements to the baseline, resources required, time scale, etc. • Develop a prioritized DETECTOR R&D program aimed at technical developments needed to reach combined design performance goals GDE Report to ILCSC

  24. GDE RDR / R&D Organization FALC ICFA FALC Resource Board ILCSC GDE Directorate GDE Executive Committee GDE R & D Board GDE Change Control Board GDE Design Cost Board Global R&D Program RDR Design Matrix ILC Design Effort ILC R&D Program GDE Report to ILCSC

  25. Request for Sample Site Information To be used to study siting issues, in advance of a call for “expressions of interest” to host the ILC GDE Report to ILCSC

  26. How and when to involve industry? • Large Scale Project Characterization • Large Project Management • Precision Engineering • International Coordination • Costing • Industrialization • Civil Construction & Infrastructure • Cryogenics • Superconducting RF structures, couplers, etc • Electronics and Control Systems • Large Scale Computing GDE Report to ILCSC

  27. 2006 From Baseline to a RDR July Dec Jan Frascati Bangalore Vancouver Valencia Freeze Configuration Organize for RDR Review Design/Cost Methodology Review Initial Design / Cost Review Final Design / Cost RDR Document Design and Costing Release RDR GDE Report to ILCSC

  28. GDE Report to ILCSC

  29. Program • An 8-day program for a complete education in linear colliders • 6 days of lectures on accelerators at Sokendai • 2 days at KEK to see and touch the real thing • Total of 21 lectures covering both basic and advanced accelerator topics • Emphasis on ILC but also including CLIC GDE Report to ILCSC

  30. All 21 lecturers confirmed A team of first-class experts in the field Good mixture of young and senior physicists Good geographical distribution in the three regions: Asia – America – Europe = 7–7–7 Good balance among various institutions, including CERN, DESY, INFN, KEK, PAL, Tohoku Univ., SLAC, LBL, JLab and Fermilab Overwhelming responses from around the world No. of students to take: 80 Applications received: 400 Application deadline: Feb 15 A tough job to select students Preference given to applicants from HEP countries A small number given to exceptional applicants from non-HEP countries Selection based on applicant’s CV and one recommendation letter Lecturers Students GDE Report to ILCSC

  31. Funding • All students will receive financial aid for attending the school, including travel • North America: • A total of US$70k received from DOE, Fermilab and SLAC for students and lecturers from North America • Asia: • Expecting US$70-80k (equiv.) from JSPS for students and lecturers from Asia • KEK to cover local expenses (meeting rooms, A/V, school supplies, computers, local transportation, etc.) • Europe: • The “Big Five” (CERN, DESY, INFN, PPARC, IN2P3) will support their students and lecturers • But we need money for supporting European students who are not from these laboratories GDE Report to ILCSC

  32. Conclusions • Baseline Configuration Complete • GDE Reorganized for RDR effort • Design effort should be fully underway by Bangalore • Design / Cost documented in RDR by 2007 • Beginning process of guiding Global R&D Effort • Linear Collider Accelerator School looks promising GDE Report to ILCSC

More Related