420 likes | 677 Views
California High Speed Rail Project. Community Perspective. CARRD. Californians Advocating Responsible Rail Design Grassroots volunteer organization Process focus Engage community and encourage participation Watchdog for transparency Do NOT advocate for a particular implementation or route
E N D
California High Speed Rail Project Community Perspective
CARRD • Californians Advocating Responsible Rail Design • Grassroots volunteer organization • Process focus • Engage community and encourage participation • Watchdog for transparency • Do NOT advocate for a particular implementation or route • Founders • Nadia Naik, Elizabeth Alexis, Rita Wespi, Sara Armstrong • Palo Alto base, State wide focus • We are not transportation experts, we are not lawyers • Contact info • website: www.calhsr.com • email: info@carrdnet.org
Agenda • Project Overview • Regional & Local Focus • Process Description • Q&A
California High Speed Rail Project • November 2008 - Prop 1A authorized State Bond Funds • plan, construct and operate a High Speed Train system from San Francisco to Los Angeles/Anaheim • Governance • High Speed Rail Authority • 9 appointed Board members • less than dozen state employees • 4 tiered web of consultants / contractors do the bulk of the work • Legislature – controls bond funds • Peer Review Committee • 8 appointed & confirmed members
800 mile network Electric powered trains via overhead contact wires Maximum speed of 220 miles per hour Fully grade-separated, dedicated track alignment HSR System
Funding Plan • Backbone System Cost: $42.6 billion • Federal Grants $17 - $19 billion • State Bond Funds $9 billion (Prop 1A) • Local Contributions $4 - $5 billion • Private Investors $10 - $12 billion • Awarded $2.25 billion stimulus funds • Plan calls for $3 Billion in Federal funding every year for 6 yrs
Program Level analyzed two routes East Bay via Altamont Peninsula via Pacheco Pacheco Route along Caltrain Corridor Selected Litigation challenged the decision EIR decertified and re-circulated Deadline: April 26! Bay Area to Central Valley
Caltrain Corridor Caltrain + HSRA = Peninsula Rail Program Caltrain and Freight will continue operations during construction San Francisco to San Jose
Palo Alto • Additional 2 tracks • Minimum 79 feet of ROW • Grade Separations • Alma, Churchill, Meadow, Charleston • Potential HSR Station • Station design options • Local requirements & contributions • Selection Process
96 ft 85 ft 79 ft Alma Cal Ave University San Antonio Peers Park Charleston Embarcadero Meadow Palo Alto Right of Way* *Approximate – not perfectly to scale. Not official diagram.
Visualization HSRA Concept Video of Churchill Crossing
Palo Alto Alternatives Eliminated • Berm/Retained fill eliminated • Where: throughout Palo Alto • Why: community objection • Open Trench, Closed Trench, Viaduct • Where: Alma • Why: El Palo Alto & San Fransisquito Creek, Historic Train Station • Underground Station & deep tunnel Caltrain • Where: corridor wide • Why: cost constraints
Mid Peninsula Station • One or none of • Redwood City, Palo Alto, Mountain View • Palo Alto has second highest Caltrain ridership (followed by Mountain View) • Station designs currently being studied • Local requirements • Parking, transit facilities • Funding support • City of Palo Alto has not taken a formal position
Process How we got here & how you can help
Environmental Review Process • Mandated by California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) • Applicant studies impacts, mitigations, alternatives • Lead Agency certifies the studies • Responsible for enforcing CEQA: you! • HSRA Environmental Reports • 2005: Statewide Program EIR • 2008: Bay Area to Central Valley Program EIR. But decertified & reopen now • Segmented into 9 Geographic Project level teams • San Francisco to San Jose Project EIR – now in “Alternatives Analysis” phase
Re-circulated Program Level EIR • Revised Draft of Program Level EIR released March 11 • www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov website • CHSRA requested comments focus only on revised material • CARRD encourages stakeholders to submit comments on the *full* record to provide up-to-date information • How to Comment - Anyone can comment! • Subject: “Bay Area to Central Valley Revised Draft Program EIR Material Comments” • Attn: Dan Levitt, California High Speed Rail Authority • 925 L Street, Suite 1425 Sacramento, CA 95814 • comments@hsr.ca.gov • fax to (916) 322-0827 • Deadline: April 26, 2010
2011 2010 2009 • Alternatives Analysis: • Develop Alternatives and Design Options • Assess the Environmental and ROW Constraints and Impacts • Select Alternatives to be Included in the EIR/EIS • Prepare Alternatives Analysis Report • Alternatives Analysis: • Develop Alternatives and Design Options • Assess Environmental & ROW Constraints and Impacts • Select Alternatives to be Included in the EIR/EIS • Prepare Alternatives Analysis Report • Alternatives Analysis: • Develop Alternatives and Design Options • Assess the Environmental and ROW Constraints and Impacts • Select Alternatives to be Included in the EIR/EIS • Prepare Alternatives Analysis Report Circulate Draft EIR/EIS Prepare SF to SJ HST Draft EIR/EIS Formally Adopt San Francisco to San Jose HST Final EIR/EIS PUBLIC & AGENCY OUTREACH PUBLIC COMMENT PUBLIC COMMENT Purpose and Need for HST Project SCOPING OUTREACH San Francisco – San Jose Project EIR
Context Sensitive Solutions • Collaborative approach • Involves all stakeholders • Works by consensus • Balance transportation needs and community values • Proven Process • Adopted by Peninsula Rail Program for SF-SJ • First time it is being used on a Rail Project • “Toolkit” to collect community information
Getting Involved • With HSRA • Officially via comments to the Environmental Review process • As a CSS Stakeholder • With your community • PAN and other grassroots groups • City of Palo Alto • Palo Alto HSR Subcommittee meetings (1st & 3rd Thurs 8:30 am) • Peninsula Cities Consortium • www.peninsularail.com
Why make a comment? • Only official way to communicate concerns • Anyone can comment • EIR is like a full disclosure document • Goal is to gather the most accurate data to based the analysis • Help identify what they need to mitigate • Do not assume HSRA knows your community • Do not assume the City of Palo Alto will comment for you • This is a once in a lifetime project and you can help make it better! • If you write a comment – it MUST be considered and addressed. • No comment means you forgo rights to any recourse in the future
Three ways to send comments • Regular U.S. mail to: • California High-Speed Rail Authority c/o Dan Leavitt925 L Street, Suite 1425Sacramento, CA 95814Attn: Bay Area to Central Valley Revised Draft Program EIR Material Comments • Via email to: comments@hsr.ca.gov • Copy to: Plandiv.info@cityofpaloalto.org • Subject line “Bay Area to Central Valley Revised Draft Program EIR Material Comments” • Fax to: (916) 322-0827
Comment basics • Include • Valid name & address • Reviewing agencies or organizations should include the name of a contact person, who would be available for questions or consultation, along with their comments • Title of EIR you are commenting on • Submit it before the deadline. • Send your comments in early, so they have time to consider your concerns • Keep a copy of your comments • Send a copy to your city
Tips on writing a good comment • Be Objective and Specific • Whenever possible, present facts or expert opinions. • If not, provide personal experience or your personal observations. Don't just complain • Separate your concerns into clearly identifiable paragraphs or headings. Don't mix topics.
Air Quality Noise / Vibration Traffic and Circulation Land Use, Development, Planning, & Growth Biological Resources Wetlands / Waters of the U.S. Flood Hazards, Floodplains, and Water Quality Visual Quality & Aesthetics Parks & Recreational Facilities Historic / Archeological Resources Hazards and Hazardous Materials Community Impacts / Environmental Justice Construction Impacts Cumulative Impacts Areas of Study
Content • Cataloging community assets • Identifying impacts & mitigations • Suggesting alternatives • Correcting any inaccuracies, omissions, errors in the record
Catalog community asset • Identify “sensitive” areas • Historic Resources • Natural Resources • Open space, trees, wildlife, wetlands/creeks • Sensitive areas • Schools, hospitals, places of worship, funeral homes • Parklands • Business Interests • Describe community values
Identify Impacts & Mitigations • Consider ways to avoid impacts or enforceable ways to reduce the severity of impacts • Quantify your concerns whenever possible • Identify the specific impact in question; • Explain why you believe the impact would occur; • Explain why you believe the effect would be significant; • Explain what additional mitigation measure(s) or changes in proposed mitigations you would recommend. • Explain why you would recommend any changes and support your recommendations. • Don’t let the fear of not having supporting data keep you from commenting.
Suggest Alternatives • Offer specific alternatives • Describe how they meet the requirements of the project • Can be on specific alignments, operations, financing, etc • Suggest different analysis methodologies
Help provide accurate record • Point out any inconsistencies in the document or the data • Point out outdated information or • Errors in logic • Focus on the sufficiency of the EIR in identifying and analyzing the possible impacts of the project on the environment
Example – Noise Pollution • Provide inventory of sensitive areas • assume most impactful alternative • 900 feet on either side of tracks • 1/4 mile radius from Stations • Be Specific • document location, population, hours, layout • reference standards (City, Federal, WHO, etc) • request specific analyses and mitigations • Identify any omissions, inaccuracies and errors in the document
CSS Toolkit • Available at Caltrain/Peninsula Rail Program Website • Seeks community feedback on all alignment options • Early participation is the best way to ensure your ideas and concerns are incorporated
Remember • Don’t be overwhelmed • You know your community – just write about it • The burden of proof is on the Authority – not you! • If you don’t offer ideas, we miss a chance for “Best Practices” Democracy is not a spectator sport!
Thank You! For more information:www.calhsr.com info@carrdnet.org