150 likes | 252 Views
Towards an appropriate institution for water resources management. Vupenyu Dzingirai, CASS. Institutions and objective. Team’s interest in the model is not merely academic .
E N D
Towards an appropriate institution for water resources management • Vupenyu Dzingirai, CASS.
Institutions and objective • Team’s interest in the model is not merely academic. • Interest derives from a conviction that institutions are charters for accessing water resources with a bearing on livelihoods. • This is the reason we were interested in • Identifying , developing and propagating the institutional model
Structure of presentation.... • The institutional component is made up of 3 related fragments • background and context. • The processual component • The institutional model proper. I deal with (ii). Rationale: methodology =model
The experience in developing the model • CASS and MCC failed to deliver on the model . • With less than 8 months to go, there was no model.. • An embarrassing matter
Consequences: introspection • Failure led to a search for reasons. • Introspection • Called for the Beitbridge Workshop.
Resolution of the B.B.Workshop Many things resolved but 2 critical. (i) Need to immediately create and intensify partnerships. Anti -Bond (ii) Need to develop a resource based plan and budget No time to work on the details
Operationalising the Recommendations St Lucial Park Workshop • The workshop = plan and budget of activities. • Consultative Workshops were key components • The plan was modified to suit available had failed to deliver.
Byo Workshop • Deliberately sited in Byo. • This was held to finalise field plans • Decision on Wards ,etc Venues, Logistics. • ZINWA was tasked to handle the field activities, based on their resources .
The UZ Workshop This was a technical event. The aim was to reflect on workshops’philosophy • Researcher centric? • Practitioner tilted ? • Or populism and idyllic The Workshop agreed on the principles and strategy to follow in the Workshops • Ours would be co-learning workshops characterised by 3 things.
Characteristic 1- Guided facilitation • Rather there would be guided facilitations. • The facilitators would literally not stand up, but sit among people... Very close to people.
Characteristic 2: Structured learning • n • The learning workshops would be structured, breaking people into thematic working groups. • 1Maping group, 2.users gp ; 3.Institutions gp 4.Gender grp
Characteristic 3- Feedback and Iterations • The learning workshops would involve reporting at all level . • Reason : accountability and feedback
Operational problems..... Food security... ..and unmanageable crowds
But, ...Results and Experience • Fulfiling experience • Fun! Meat • Building of Relationships intra-&inter • Relationship responsible for data build up • significance