1 / 7

West Virginia Board of Ed v. Barnette

West Virginia Board of Ed v. Barnette. March-June, 1943 Created By Chelsea S. background. The West Virginia Board of Education required all students enrolled in public school to salute the flag (est. 1942) Refusal to do so was punishable by death Just kidding, more like detention.

lalo
Download Presentation

West Virginia Board of Ed v. Barnette

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. West Virginia Board of Ed v. Barnette March-June, 1943 Created By Chelsea S.

  2. background • The West Virginia Board of Education required all students enrolled in public school to salute the flag (est. 1942) • Refusal to do so was punishable by death • Just kidding, more like detention • Jehovah’s Witnesses forbid pledging oneself to a ‘graven image’ and consider the flag such • Walter Barnette, a Jehovah’s Witness sued the school board

  3. Does requiring school children to salute the flag violate their first amendment rights? The issue

  4. precedent • In Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940) the court held (8-1) that the Minersville School District was justified in the expulsion of two students who refused to salute the flag on religious grounds (The children were also Jehovah’s Witnesses) • The case focused on an individual’s right to freedom of religion protected by the First Amendment • The decision argued that ““National unity is the basis of national security,” [and] that the authorities have “the right to select appropriate means for its attainment…””

  5. The case • Walter Barnette sued in U.S. district court and won an injunction against enforcement of the rule • The West Virginia Board of Ed. appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court • The Court overturned the Gobitis ruling in a 6-3 decision • The majority opinion cited an individual’s right to religious freedom and right to free speech protected by the first amendment as well as the right to equal protection of the laws as guaranteed by the 14th • The Court ruled that “compulsory unification of opinion” was contradictory to First Amendment values

  6. A 6-3 vote Chief Justice Stone Rutledge Jackson Murphy Reed Frankfurter Really? Frankfurter?

  7. implications • The opinion specified that the freedom of speech included the right not to be forced to speak against one’s will and represented one of the most sweeping statements about the extent of the free exercise clause • The Court went on to approve religious exemption in other cases as well, such as Sherbert v. Verner(allowed a Seventh-Day Adventist to receive unemployment despite not working on Saturdays) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (allowed Amish to withdraw their children from school after the 8th grade)

More Related