1 / 16

Gl bal Last-Line of Defense (GOLD)

Gl bal Last-Line of Defense (GOLD). John Marcy ASTE 527 Concept October 9, 2012. Background. Earth has experienced the extinction of a species, the Tunguska event within the past 100 years, and will experience a close call in the year 2029

latham
Download Presentation

Gl bal Last-Line of Defense (GOLD)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gl bal Last-Line of Defense (GOLD) John Marcy ASTE 527 Concept October 9, 2012

  2. Background • Earth has experienced the extinction of a species, the Tunguska event within the past 100 years, and will experience a close call in the year 2029 • Example NASA programs involved in the discovery of Near-Earth Objects: • Spaceguard:93% of objects found with diameter > 1 km • NEOWISE: 20-23% of objects found with diameter > 100 m • LINEAR: Adapting technology to follow satellites to discover NEO’s

  3. History 1908 – A 50 m asteroid exploded over Siberia with the equivalent damage of 600 Hiroshima nuclear bombs – Tunguska Event January 1967 – Outer Space Treaty signed between the U.S., Russia, and the U.K. The same year, a group of MIT students look to develop first asteroid interceptor with Project Icarus July 1991 – STrategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) signed 1998 – Congress mandates for discovery of 90% of asteroids greater than 1 km 2005 – Congress mandates for discovery of 90% of asteroids greater than 140 m by the year 2020, funds pending April 2010 – New START treaty signed between the U.S. and Russia 2029 – The 300 m asteroid 99942 Apophis will miss Earth by approximately one tenth the distance from the Earth to Moon

  4. Context • For impacts predicted with lead times greater than 10 years, altering the orbit of the asteroid’s trajectory can cause it to miss Earth Completely • There currently exists nomitigation plan against eventual Earth impact with these smaller, yet still powerful asteroids • Deep Impact has previewed the necessary technology to enable GOLD

  5. The Scenario / Assumptions • With very little warning, an asteroid has been discovered to impact a highly populated city • For example, a minivan size meteor struck northern California, on April 26, 2012 • This concept addresses taking out aggressor with existing nuclear warhead with a penetrator/subsurface detonation first, not a stand off detonation • GOLD provides Earth with a last line of defense

  6. The GOLD Spacecraft • The Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV) is a missile that has been in service since 2004 and widely tested against an array of targets 23in Mass = 65.3 kg 55 in Cooling System Heat Shield Nuc Mass = 1100 kg Total Dry Mass = 1500 kg Total Wet Mass = 3000 kg Nuclear Device Adaptor with expeller

  7. Timeline EKV separates and detonates Sensors on with ~24 hours to go Initial maneuver and Guide autonomously for ~24-48 hours ~3 min into flight separation Nuclear warhead detonates on area impacted by EKV Launch for a ΔV ranging from 2-30 km/s > 15 day launch window needed

  8. The Need vs. Risk for Nuclear • The momentum/energy transfer created by a shallow subsurface nuclear explosion is at least 100 times more effective than that of a standoff nuclear explosion

  9. Limitations • Develop a more adaptable system • NEO’s can vary in size, shape, orientation, spin, etc • Extreme high velocities already a major concern • Ensure the system is as 100% reliable • There is a known issue with EKV and multiple objects – dual salvo?

  10. Future Studies • Develop choreographed response to incoming threat • Send multiple GOLD spacecraft to repeatedly strike the incoming asteroid • Decrease the threat of nuclear fallout • This will alleviate some of the political and environmental worries • Adapt the system to counter the possible comet impact • Comets move on the order 10 times faster and could be bigger than asteroids • Long term – use possible Lunar base as a way to track potential threats, and launch for quicker deployment and smaller ΔV’s

  11. The Global PlanetaryDefensive Agency (GPDA) • Tasks: • Maintain the three stations across the Equator • Monitor the skies for incoming threats • Reallocate of the global nuclear arsenal • Analyze the scenario for the last line of defense • Location of impact vs. potential nuclear fallout

  12. References • Houdu, Guillaume. “Hypervelocity Nuclear Interceptor Proposed for Asteroid Impactors”. http://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/2012/09/25/innovative-hypervelocity-nuclear-interceptor-spacecraft-mitigating-impact-threat-asteroids/. 25 September 2012 • Thangavelu, Madhu. “Putting Surplus Nukes to Good Use”. www.spacenews.com. 12 April 2010. • Wei, Bong. “Hypervelocity Nuclear Interceptors for Asteroid Deflection or Disruption”. 2011 IAA Planetary Defense Conference, 09-12 May 2011. • http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php/40725-How-to-Colonize-the-Moon-without-breaking-NASA-s-budget • http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/04/26/rush-on-to-find-fragments-of-california-meteor/ • http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/12/07/thousands-of-nearby-asteroids-are-big-enough-to-harm-earth-nasa/ • http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/programs/linear.htmlhttp://spacewatch.lpl.arizona.edu/ • http://timeforchange.org/nuclear-energy-and-nuclear-weapons-per-country • http://www.adrc.iastate.edu/ • http://www.defense.gov/news/briefingslide.aspx?briefingslideid=182 • http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/nasa-plans-armageddon-spacecraft-to-blast-asteroid-215924/ • http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2012-138 • http://www.missilethreat.com/missiledefensesystems/id.17/system_detail.asp • http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12842&page=1 • http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/deepimpact/mission/index.html • http://www.strath.ac.uk/space/research/missionsystems/asteroiddeflectiontechnologies/

  13. Backup Slides

  14. Interceptor Options • Kinetic Energy Interceptor (KEI) • Only takes 3 hours to set up battery of 10 missiles • Max possible ΔV of only 10 km/s • Complete missile – hard to modify • 12 m long, 1 m wide • NASA “Cradle” • To carry B83 nuc • 8.9 m long, 11,035 kg • Planned to use un-funded Ares V launch vehicle

  15. The Need for Nuclear • The momentum/energy transfer created by a shallow subsurface nuclear explosion is at least 100 times more effective than that of a standoff nuclear explosion • Extensive research shows only 3% of asteroid mass to impact Earth with a 15 days lead time • Only 0.2% if intercepted along the asteroid trajectory, i.e. anti-parallel • If capable of launching with a greater lead time, the probability of impacted mass as well as nuclear fallout greatly decreases • This 15 day period is simply a last resort limit

  16. Testing • Asteroid surveying missions not only raise awareness , but also detect possible test sites for the GOLD project • Optimal candidate: • Impact point behind Earth, to decrease nuclear fallout risk • Size of asteroid should start large and decrease to test sensor capabilities • Possible candidates • 2012 DA14 in February 2013 • 99942 Apophis which will have 2 flybys, 2029 and April 2036 • Liens: • The trajectories will be better understood • First shot without active nuclear device • Can increase in fidelity from there

More Related