1 / 31

1.040/1.401 Project Management Spring 2007 Lecture 9 Deterministic Planning Part II

1.040/1.401 Project Management Spring 2007 Lecture 9 Deterministic Planning Part II. Dr. SangHyun Lee. lsh@mit.edu. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology . Project Management Phase. DESIGN PLANNING . DEVELOPMENT. OPERATIONS . CLOSEOUT.

lawrence
Download Presentation

1.040/1.401 Project Management Spring 2007 Lecture 9 Deterministic Planning Part II

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1.040/1.401Project ManagementSpring 2007Lecture 9Deterministic Planning Part II Dr. SangHyun Lee lsh@mit.edu Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  2. Project Management Phase DESIGN PLANNING DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS CLOSEOUT FEASIBILITY Fin.&Eval. Organization Risk Estimating Planning & Scheduling

  3. Outline • Network Techniques • CPM • PDM • Linear Scheduling Method

  4. Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) Gantt chart A (10) B (10) Activity B will start right after Activity A finishes CPM (AON) A 10 B 10 A (10) Activity B will start right after Activity A starts B (10)

  5. Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) • PDM Extends CPM to include • Multiple relationships beyond Finish-to-Start • Finish-to-Finish • Start-to-Start • Start-to-Finish

  6. PDM – Types of Relationships A B • FS Finish-to-start • SS Start-to-start • FF Finish-to-finish • SF Start-to-finish A B A B A B

  7. Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) Gantt chart A (10) B (10) Activity B will start after Activity A finishes CPM (AON) A 10 B 10 A (10) Activity B will start 5 days later after Activity A finishes (5) B (10) A 10 A’ 5 B 10

  8. Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) • PDM Extends CPM to include • Lag (+) & Lead (-) A (10) FS (+5) B (10) A (10) FS (-5) B (10)

  9. PDM Relationships w/ Lag & Lead Lay-Out & Excavate Finish-to-StartLead Finish-to-StartLag Start-to-StartLead Start-to-StartLag Install Fuel Tanks FS -1 Pour 4th-Floor Slab Remove 4th Floor Shoring FS +14 SS -1 Backfill Pipe Install Pipe Install Fuel Tanks Install Exterior Conduits SS +1 Adapted from: Callahan et al., 1992

  10. Form Slab on Grade FF -1 Reinforce Slab on Grade Excavate Trench FF +3 Lay Pipe Approve SF -1 Prepare Wall Shop Drawings SF +10 Install Wood Paneling & Base Install Carpeting PDM Relationships w/ Lag & Lead Finish-to-FinishLead Finish-to-FinishLag Start-to-FinishLead Start-to-FinishLag Adapted from: Callahan et al., 1992

  11. Slack or Float in PDM • Total Float (TF) • TF(k) = LF(k) - ES(k) - Dk • Start Float (SF) • SF(k) = LS(k) - ES(k) • Finish Float (FNF) • FNF(k) = LF(k) - EF(k)

  12. PDM Example 30 10 1 C GC A GC 2 3 3 40 80 90 100 D EL H ME K ME FINISH 2 6 2 0 1 1 ES EF START LS LF D TF SF FNF 20 50 B GC E ME 4 4 60 70 2 F GC G EL 6 3 Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  13. Forward Pass 30’s ES = 10’s EF + Lag (FS) 30 10 1 3 6 0 4 C GC A GC 2 3 3 40 80 90 100 D EL H ME K ME FINISH 2 6 2 0 1 1 0 0 START LS LF D TF SF FNF 20 50 4 0 B GC E ME 4 4 60 70 2 F GC G EL 6 3 Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  14. Forward Pass 30 10 1 3 6 0 4 C GC A GC 100’s ES = 90’S EF 100’s ES = 70’s EF MAX 2 3 3 40 80 90 100 17 17 15 9 9 17 7 15 D EL H ME K ME FINISH 2 6 2 0 1 1 0 0 START LS LF D TF SF FNF 20 50 4 0 8 4 B GC E ME 4 4 60 70 2 15 12 12 6 F GC G EL 6 3 Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  15. Backward Pass 30 10 1 3 6 0 4 C GC A GC 2 3 3 40 80 90 100 17 17 15 9 9 17 7 15 D EL H ME K ME FINISH 9 17 17 17 15 15 2 6 2 0 1 1 0 0 START D TF SF FNF 20 50 4 0 8 4 B GC E ME 4 4 60 70 2 15 12 12 6 F GC G EL 17 14 70’s LF = 100’S LS 70’s LS = 80’s LF - 1 6 3 MIN Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  16. Backward Pass 30 10 1 3 6 0 4 C GC A GC 0 4 3 6 2 3 3 40 80 90 100 17 17 15 9 9 17 7 15 D EL H ME K ME FINISH 9 7 17 17 9 17 15 15 2 6 2 0 1 1 0 0 START 0 0 D TF SF FNF 20 50 4 0 8 4 B GC E ME 9 1 5 5 4 4 1’s LF = 10’S LS 1’s LF = 20’s LS 60 70 MIN 2 15 12 12 6 F GC G EL 8 17 14 14 6 3 Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  17. Total Slack or Float 30 10 1 3 6 0 4 C GC A GC 0 4 3 6 TS or TF = LF - ES - D 2 0 0 3 3 40 80 90 100 17 17 15 9 9 17 7 15 D EL H ME K ME FINISH 9 7 17 17 9 17 15 15 2 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 START 0 0 D 0 SF FNF 20 50 4 0 8 4 B GC E ME 9 1 5 5 4 4 1 1 60 70 2 15 12 12 6 F GC G EL 8 17 14 14 6 3 2 2 Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  18. Critical Path 30 10 1 3 6 0 4 C GC A GC 0 4 3 6 2 0 0 3 3 40 80 90 100 17 17 15 9 9 17 7 15 D EL H ME K ME FINISH 9 7 17 17 9 17 15 15 2 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 START 0 0 D 0 SF FNF 20 50 4 0 8 4 B GC E ME 9 1 5 5 4 4 1 1 60 70 2 15 12 12 6 F GC G EL 8 17 14 14 6 3 2 2 Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  19. Start & Finish Slack or Float 30 10 1 3 6 0 4 C GC A GC 0 4 3 6 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 40 80 90 100 17 17 15 9 9 17 7 15 D EL H ME K ME FINISH 9 7 17 17 9 17 15 15 2 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 START 0 0 D 0 0 0 20 50 4 0 8 4 B GC E ME 9 1 5 5 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 60 70 2 15 12 12 6 F GC G EL 8 17 14 14 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  20. PDM Caveat: Vanishing Critical Path • Tracing critical path can be difficult • Finish-finish constraints with leads can lead to “vanishing” critical path FF -5 Total float Duration

  21. PDM Caveat - Counter-Intuitive • Tracing critical path can be difficult • Can be counter-intuitive • The longer A20 is, the smaller the critical path duration and quicker can complete! A30 FF 2 A20 SS 0 A10

  22. Slack or Float “Ownership” • Tension between owner and contractor • Significant legal implications • Problem: • Owners seek to push contractors on tight schedule • Too many late starts risk overall project duration • Contractors seek flexibility • Flexibility has value

  23. Outline • Network Techniques • CPM • PDM • Linear Scheduling Method

  24. Linear Scheduling Method (LOM) • Line-of-Balance • Time + Location • Repetitive Linear Activities • Rate of Progress (production rate)

  25. LSM Diagram Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  26. Plotting Activity Progress Lines Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  27. Use of Restraint on LSM Diagram Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  28. Activity Interference Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  29. Use of Activity Buffers in LSM Schedules Source: Callahan et al., 1992

  30. LSM – Example LinearPlus

  31. LSM – Example Tilos

More Related