1 / 18

SAMARIS - WP12

SAMARIS - WP12. Strategies for Rehabilitation of Highway Structures Mid-Term Review Partners: TRL, ZAG, UCD, EPFL July 04. Partners. TRL Richard Woodward Bill McMahon Malcolm Mckenzie ZAG Ales Znidaric UCD Mark Richardson EPFL Emmanuel Denari é. Tasks.

leann
Download Presentation

SAMARIS - WP12

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SAMARIS - WP12 Strategies for Rehabilitation of Highway Structures Mid-Term Review Partners: TRL, ZAG, UCD, EPFL July 04

  2. Partners • TRL • Richard Woodward • Bill McMahon • Malcolm Mckenzie • ZAG • Ales Znidaric • UCD • Mark Richardson • EPFL • Emmanuel Denarié

  3. Tasks • Task 12.1 Description of the problem • Task 12.2 Review of other work • Task 12.3 Development of guidelines.

  4. Task 12.1 • Inception Report • Define scientific QA procedures • Review of methods available for the rehabilitation of highway structures (M2)

  5. Task 12.2 Review of Other Work (M6) • Review of strategies • Frangopol • Branco Britto • BRIME • BAPS (Highways Agency) • NORECON • Non-technical issues

  6. Issues • Definitions • Two approaches • Rigorous • Qualitative • Selection of suitable repair methods (life etc) • Contact with Rehabcon

  7. Rigorous Approach • Sum all costs: • Initial • Inspection • Maintenance • Repairs • Failure • Replacement • Environmental/social

  8. Issues • Definitions • Two approaches • Rigorous • Qualitative • Selection of suitable repair methods (life etc) • Contact with Rehabcon

  9. Rehabcon: Repair of Concrete Structures Non-technical issues

  10. Tasks • Task 12.1 Description of the problem - Complete • Task 12.2 Review of other work - Complete • Task 12.3 Development of guidelines.

  11. Task 12.3 Development of Guidelines • Collect case studies • Determine criteria in different countries • Investigate other methods for decision making • Liaise with WPs 13-15 • Draft Guidelines

  12. Aleje Jerozolimskie Viaduct, Warsaw Case Studies • Name of structure  • Description - any special features • Reason for rehabilitation  • Options considered  • Selected option – and reasons

  13. Criteria in Different Countries • WP members to provide information on criteria in their countries • Contact road administrations through FEHRL

  14. Other Methods for Decision Making • Value management • Concepts being developed for FORMAT • Genetic algorithms • Multi-criteria decision making

  15. Develop Guidelines • The decision making process - what needs to be taken into account and how the different influences are balanced. • The information needed to inform the decision making - this links to WP15. • The options available – WP13 & WP14 examples.

  16. Changes - 1 D31 Change title from: Guidelines on selection and use of innovative materials for the rehabilitation of highway structures to Guidelines on the selection of innovative techniques for the rehabilitation of concrete highway structures

  17. Programme

  18. Planned Work • Continue to collect case studies • Determine criteria for decision in different countries • Investigate applicability of other decision making criteria • Investigate applicability of Value Management • Liaison with FORMAT • Maintain liaison with WPs 13 – 15 • Develop Guidelines

More Related