130 likes | 290 Views
CHILLERS PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE. N40083-13-R-3106 NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES, IL DECEMBER 11, 2012. AGENDA. Welcome/Introductions Project Overview Contractual Background Safety and Quality Control Site Tour Wrap-Up. GOVERNMENT TEAM. Sari Brindel, Supv . Contracting Officer
E N D
CHILLERSPRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE N40083-13-R-3106 NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES, IL DECEMBER 11, 2012
AGENDA • Welcome/Introductions • Project Overview • Contractual Background • Safety and Quality Control • Site Tour • Wrap-Up
GOVERNMENT TEAM • Sari Brindel, Supv. Contracting Officer • Dave Marasco, PM&E Branch Manager • Belinda Trout, Contracting Officer • Aaron Brncich, Construction Manager • Tevin Thompson, Sr. Mechanical Engineer • Jim Herzog, Engineering Tech • Lloyd Slattery, Technical Advisor • Robert Kidd, Safety Manager
PURPOSE / POINT OF CONTACT FOR RFI’s • Provide a brief overview of the Request for Proposal (RFP) • Provide an opportunity for you to identify any issues with the RFP; clarify evaluation factors • Ask and write down any questions relative to this project via a Request for Information (RFI) • CAUTION—Today’s Q&A’s are not contractually binding!
PROJECT OVERVIEW • Firm-Fixed Price Type Contract • Buildings 30, 190, 215, 42, 329, 2B, 31, 32, 33, 34 at NAVSTA Great Lakes, IL • SVOSB set-aside • NAICS 238220, size std. of $14 M • Overall budget $3.1 M
SOURCE SELECTION • IAW FAR 15-101-1: Best Value—Tradeoff • Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) • Evaluation Factors • Factor 1 – Technical Approach • Factor 2 – Experience • Factor 3 – Past Performance • Factor 4 – Safety • Factor 5 – Technical Solution • Factor 6 – Price (1,2,4,5 = 3) (1-5 = 6) Pg. 7 of solicitation
EXPERIENCE / PAST PERFORMANCE Experience pertains to the volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on contracts. Relavant Project: For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as previous overhaul and replacement of commercial-grade chillers with a similar degree of complexity and dollar value. Offerors shall have a minimum of five (5) years experience with comparable work.
PAST PERFORMANCE (pg. 11) Offeror should submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for each of the experiences provided in Factor 2-Experience only if a completed CPARS is not available. Clients may submit PPQ’s directly to the Contracting Officer if desired. Belinda.trout@navy.mil or Fax: 847-688-3689 Offerors may address any adverse past performance issues, problems encountered, and corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2.
SAFETY / SECURITY • EM-385 http://publications.usace.army.mil/publications/eng-manuals/ • Traffic Control • Base Passes / Security info@rapidgate.com
CHILLERS PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE QUESTIONS ??