220 likes | 723 Views
ISO 13628-1. Wellhead Integrity A systems approach needed requering information from several traditional disciplines. Introduction: System overview. Rig and riser loads on well Complex interaction between drilling and well components Soil interface. Subsea Tree Terminology.
E N D
ISO 13628-1 Wellhead Integrity A systems approach needed requering information from several traditional disciplines
Introduction: System overview • Rig and riser loads on well • Complex interaction between drilling and well components • Soil interface
Subsea Tree Terminology Horizontal subsea tree (HXT) Tubing hanger Tree connector threaded onto bottom of Composite Valve Block Tree connector Wellhead (HP) housing Conductor (LP) housing
History • Fatigue damage to wellhead West of Shetland in the 80’ies. Assumed damage caused by vortex induced vibrations VIV • Observed movements in several wellhead in the North Sea in 2005, 2006 and 2010 • One wellhead was retrieved and inspected without findings • Fatigue calculations from different parties with differences in results of several magnitudes. • “Wellhead Fatigue – Method Statement Update” in 2009, as a joint effort, Statoil and DNV, with input from WH suppliers. • Further updated and issued by the WH JIP ISO 13628-7 Table B.6 Principal parameters
Background • Increased re-entry on existing wells on the Norwegian continental shelf. • Complex well designs and operations including multilateral- and smart wells increases drilling time. Increased amount on intervention and work-over operations on sub sea wells. • Life time extension of wells, Specified total drilling time for new complex wells can be up to 300 days • Increased size of drilling rigs and weight of BOP’s, on new rigs up to 400 ton
Wellhead and connectors – current status • Dry wellheads and XT’s moved offshore and subsea • Designed for pressure containment • Designed with little consideration to fatigue i.e. • Fatigue life not specified in design • Complex geometry, difficult to calculate • Inspection not possible, no logging of fatigue damage rates normally availableand operational history records are not “too” detailed. • Advanced Wellhead Calculation methods in place, but: • By nature, sensitive to variations in input parameters. • The data as cement level etc. need to be logged for as built doc’s of the well. • Calculation models not calibrated with offshore field measurements • some info from instrumentation, but more needed for calibration of analytical tool and identification of effects like rig trim etc.
Tree Connector / Wellhead Fatigue Design Practice • Design Practice Main Points • The fatigue assessment of subsea tree connectors and wellheads requires analyses and understanding the interactions of: • The floating vessel and drilling and marine riser • Subsea well stack-up • Wellhead and downhole casing assemblies • Cement and soils • The methodology reflects industry experience and offers a balance among analysis efficiency compatible with project and operational constraints • The methodology is based upon dynamic analysis of models to obtain global response loads of the floating drilling unit, riser, and wellhead • Finite element analyses are then used to translate local stresses and to define stress concentration factors for structural details of interest. • Fatigue lives will be based upon local stresses and fatigue resistance defined by S-N curves
Wellhead Integrity in 13628-1 • ISO 13628-1 • Appendix XX Wellhead Integrity TOC • (based on Wellhead Fatigue Analyses Method and NORSOK U001) • Introduction • Objective • Scope • Safety Philosophy • System Description • Well • Drilling • CWO • Loads • Load Conditions • General - Operational phases • Extreme/Survival (NORSOK U001) • Installation, drilling, CWO • Fatigue • Drilling, CWO • Analyses Methodology • Modelling Philosophy • Extreme/Survival • Fatigue • Analyses Input Data • Local Response Analyses • Global Load Analyses • Design Criteria (general, no new factors) • Extreme/Survival (different i ISO 13628-4/-7/13624-1) • Fatigue • Reporting • Objective • Interaction with other stakeholders • Reporting format • What to report • Stress concentration factors • Component capacities for pressure, tension, moment (combined loads) • Component/connector stiffnesses • Cumulative fatigue damage