1 / 8

1850 Fugitive Slave Law

1850 Fugitive Slave Law. Law enforcement officials who chose not to arrest alleged runaway slaves could be fined $1000 ($26,600 today) A claimant’s sworn testimony was sufficient for an arrest No jury trial could be given, nor could the suspected runaway provide testimony

libby
Download Presentation

1850 Fugitive Slave Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1850 Fugitive Slave Law • Law enforcement officials who chose not to arrest alleged runaway slaves could be fined $1000 ($26,600 today) • A claimant’s sworn testimony was sufficient for an arrest • No jury trial could be given, nor could the suspected runaway provide testimony • Any citizen aiding an escaped slave could be fined $1000 and/or serve jail time • The federal official got $5 if the runaway was freed, but $10 if not

  2. Effects • Turns many moderates in the North into stronger opponents of slavery and the South • Many free blacks in the North were enslaved since they had little opportunity to defend themselves in court • Northerners were now forced to participate in a practice they did not like, rather than simply ignore it • Supports belief of a Southern slave-power conspiracy

  3. The Dred Scott Decision

  4. Background • Scott born a slave in VA in 1800, taken to MO in 1820, then bought by army surgeon John Emerson & taken to IL (a free state) • In 1836, Emerson & Scott move to the WI territory; Congress had banned slavery in all territories in the Missouri Compromise of 1820 • Emerson reassigned to LA but leaves Scott in WI; Emerson marries and sends for Scott to come to LA • Emerson dies, & Dredd Scott is inherited by his wife Eliza

  5. The Case • In 1846, Scott sues for his freedom based on his past habitation in free states & territories, but keeps losing on technicalities • Reaches Supreme Court by March 1857 • Court, consisting of mostly men who support slavery, hands down decision: • Scott cannot sue bc he is black, & therefore not a citizen of the United States • The ban on slavery in territories was considered unconstitutional

  6. Effects • Once again, outrages Northerners & fuels the theory of a slave-power conspiracy • Congress had seemed to side with the South in the K-N Act, 10 out of 15 of the first presidents were slave-owners, & now the Supreme Court had seemed to side w/ the South; that’s 3 out of 3 branches of gov. • Northerners were terrified the next ruling would be that all states had no right to ban slavery • Further fanned flames of civil war

  7. The Good News... • Dred Scott’s 1st owner purchased freedom for he & his family 2 months after trial • BUT...Scott dies of tuberculosis 18 months later

More Related