1 / 4

WECC VGC Planning Guide Work Status

WECC VGC Planning Guide Work Status. Dr. Bharat Vyakaranam (On behalf of Dr. Yuri V. Markov) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory ( E-mail: BharatGNVSR.Vyakaranam@pnnl.gov) WECC VGS Meeting Salt Lake C ity, Utah June 14, 2012. Current Status Overview.

lilith
Download Presentation

WECC VGC Planning Guide Work Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WECC VGC Planning Guide Work Status Dr. Bharat Vyakaranam (On behalf of Dr. Yuri V. Markov) Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (E-mail: BharatGNVSR.Vyakaranam@pnnl.gov) WECC VGS Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah June 14, 2012

  2. 2 Current Status Overview • The Guide has been distributed for a review among several VGS members (Response is weak. We need more reviews). • Permissions for reused material have been obtained for all figures/citations that required them • Along with the overall positivefeedback, the main critical comments are • The size of the Guide is too big - reductions suggested • Some parts of the Guide are too academic • We take these comments seriously • Working on  deductions in the main body  by moving some materials to Appendices (50% complete) • We will have Vol. 1 for the main materials and Vol. 2 for appendices • Several reviews were done by PNNL’s engineers

  3. 3 Current Status Overview • The revision will be completed in 2-3 weeks. • We will need a technical writer review • Should it be a reviewer from WECC or PNNL • Should we use WECC template? Can we get one? • We need a capacity value section (Matt?) and a CREZ section (Need materials from ERCOT) • We have created a SharePoint site (2010). This will let us work on documentation simultaneously and resolve any conflicts from simultaneous changes • Should we rename the Guide? E.g. call it a White Paper? The Guide sounds like a prescription document which is confusing for some reviewers.

  4. Thanks & Questions?

More Related