70 likes | 156 Views
Email Update. Timeline. Winter 2010 CESD Proposes Migrating off Notes to Exchange Spring 2010 PPS Presentation Google & Live@Edu CESD Initial Research into Exchange 2010 Summer 2010 CESD Cost Estimates and Research Final Recommendation. Overall Findings. Exchange 2010 High Cost
E N D
Timeline • Winter 2010 • CESD Proposes Migrating off Notes to Exchange • Spring 2010 • PPS Presentation Google & Live@Edu • CESD Initial Research into Exchange 2010 • Summer 2010 • CESD Cost Estimates and Research • Final Recommendation
Overall Findings • Exchange 2010 • High Cost • Ideal Server & Client Feature Set • Complexity of ESD Environment & Exchange • Lotus Notes • High Cost • Solid Server & Client Feature Set • Lack of Wide Application Integration • Live@Edu • Low Cost • State Agreement in Process • Cost for Migration from Notes • Google Apps • Lowest Cost • State Agreement & Broad K12 Adoption • Limited Client Capability
Recommendation CESD is Recommending Adoption of Cloud Based Email Services
Advantages Live@Edu • 50m Users Worldwide • Active Directory integration • Full Featured Outlook Utilization • Mac Office Desktop Client Support • Low Cost • Broadest Feature Set for Cost • Native MS Office File Support • Outlook Application Integration • Full ActiveSync (iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad, Android Support)
Advantages Google Apps • 7m Users Worldwide • Active Directory integration • Near Universal Web Browser Support • Outlook Client (Limited) • Postini Archiving Option • Lowest Cost • No-cost Conversion Tools (Exchange & Notes) • Shared Editing of Documents • iPhone, iPod Touch, iPad, Android Support