1 / 50

Delivering Major Minnesota Bridges Hastings Bridge Design Build Project

Vincent Gastoni, PE. March 5, 2013. Delivering Major Minnesota Bridges Hastings Bridge Design Build Project. Redundancy and Service Life. MnDOT – ACEC/MN Annual Conference Leading Together- Innovative Solutions for an Evolving Industry. Project Location Map. Base Map Source: Google Maps.

loc
Download Presentation

Delivering Major Minnesota Bridges Hastings Bridge Design Build Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Vincent Gastoni, PE March 5, 2013 Delivering Major Minnesota Bridges Hastings Bridge Design Build Project Redundancy and Service Life MnDOT – ACEC/MN Annual Conference Leading Together- Innovative Solutions for an Evolving Industry

  2. Project Location Map Base Map Source: Google Maps

  3. Project Overview - Existing Bridge • Highway 61 over Mississippi River • Highest daily two-lane highway traffic volume in the state • MnDOT Chapter 152 Bridge • Project replaces 1950 steel arch truss • Lowest 1% in the state for overall sufficiency

  4. Project Overview - Aerial Plan

  5. Project Overview - Design-Build Process Design-Build SOQ Issued: October 2009 Design Build Selection: June 2010 MnDOT identified two acceptable alternatives RFP allowed Alternative Technical Concepts (ATC’s) Design Build Team:

  6. Project Overview - Design-Build Process INNOVATIVE RFP FEATURES • Alternative Technical Concepts (ATC’s) • Allow innovation and flexibility • Pre Approved Elements (PAE) • Reduce risk and provide best value opportunities • Redundancy Concepts for the Main Structure Segment • Scour Analysis Method • Bridge Fixity and Thermal Expansion of Bridge No. 19004 • Refined Analysis Method

  7. Project Overview - Design-Build Process TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORING Bridge 34 Points Environmental Management 6 Points Maintenance of Traffic 5 Points Public Communications 2 Points Schedule 3 Points

  8. Project Overview - Design-Build Process TECHNICAL PROPOSAL SCORING • Bridge 34 Points • Durability/Quality of Bridge No. 19004 13 Points • Inspection/Maintenance 9 Points • Geotechnical 5 Points • Erection of Bridge No. 19004 4 Points • Demolition of Bridge No. 5895 3 Points

  9. Project Overview - Design-Build Process • Bid Price Technical Score SCORING DRIVES INNOVATION Selection =

  10. Project Overview - Design-Build Process • Bid Price Technical Score • Minimize Bid Price Maximize Technical Score SCORING DRIVES INNOVATION Selection = Win Strategy=

  11. Project Overview - Design-Build Process • Bid Price Technical Score • Minimize Bid Price Maximize Technical Score Need A Better Mouse Trap SCORING DRIVES INNOVATION • Selection = • Win Strategy= • Use innovative ATC’s & PAE’s to: • Minimize Risks • Optimize Design Solution

  12. Design-Build Process – Base Concepts MnDOT RFP Baseline Options

  13. Design-Build Process – Base Concepts MnDOT Cable Stayed Option

  14. Design-Build Process – Base Concepts MnDOT Arch Option

  15. Base Concept Evaluation • Evaluate Base Designs • Preliminary engineering analysis • Cost estimating exercises • Produce Comprehensive Evaluation Matrix Tool • Material costs & risks • Develop Alternative Designs

  16. Innovation – Develop Alternatives • Evaluate Alternative Designs • Prescriptive design/performance criteria • Aesthetic requirements • Technical scoring criteria • Cost & schedule impacts • Add to Comprehensive Evaluation Matrix Tool • Develop Overall Best Value Technical Approach

  17. Innovation – Develop Alternatives Lunda/Ames-Parsons Alternatives

  18. Innovation – Develop Alternatives

  19. Innovation – Develop Alternatives

  20. Innovative Winning Alternative • Successful Proposal-Free Standing Tied Arch $120M • 545 ft. Main Span Project Architect: Bradley Touchstone, Touchstone Architecture

  21. Innovative Winning Alternative Project Architect: Bradley Touchstone, Touchstone Architecture

  22. Visual Quality Process & Color Selection

  23. Aesthetic Lighting Lighting Design: Illumination Arts

  24. Innovative Features - Concrete Tie • More durable than steel box • No shop assembly and fit-up issues • Active tension control Best value solution Higher level of redundancy Ease of inspection/maintenance

  25. Innovative Features - Concrete Knuckle • Post-tensioned anchorage • Highly redundant Framed into pier and rib Improved durability/fit-up

  26. Innovative Features – Steel Box Arch Rib • Simplified fabrication • Best Value solution Aesthetically pleasing Improved maintenance

  27. Innovative Features - Floor System Redundancy

  28. Innovative Features - Erection

  29. Innovative Features - Erection • Build low TEMP BRACING ARCH RIB FLOOR SYSTEM TEMP TIE & FORMS TEMP LIFTING CONNECTION

  30. Innovative Features - Erection • Build Low On Land TEMP BRACING ARCH RIB FLOOR SYSTEM TEMP TIE & FORMS TEMP LIFTING CONNECTION

  31. Innovative Features - Erection • Build Low On Land

  32. Erection • Move onto Barges Using SPMT’s

  33. Innovative Features - Erection • Move onto Barges Using SPMT’s

  34. Innovative Features - Erection • Float

  35. Innovative Features - Erection • Float

  36. Innovative Features - Erection • Skid

  37. Innovative Features - Erection • Skid

  38. Innovative Features - Erection • Skid

  39. Innovative Features - Erection • Lift

  40. Innovative Features - Erection • Lift

  41. Innovative Features - Erection • Lockoff

  42. Innovative Features - Erection • Get Some Sleep

  43. Other Innovative Features • Column Supported Embankment • Long Span Precast Concrete Beams

  44. Other Innovative Features COLUMN SUPPORTED EMBANKMENT • 4” over 25 years • CSE -10’x10’ Pile Grid • Conc. Caps • Sand/Geogrid

  45. Other Innovative Features • LONG SPAN PRECAST BEAMS • Precast Pretensioned Concrete Beams • 5 Spans of 9-Girder Lines • 173’-7” Long Span • Longest Beam Overall length = 174’-3” • Innovative beam design became the basis of MnDOT’s new MW Long Span Precast Concrete Beam Standards

  46. Other Innovative Features • LONG SPAN PRECAST BEAMS Photos: Joel Mich, Cretex

  47. Other Innovative Features • LONG SPAN PRECAST BEAMS Photos: Joel Mich, Cretex

  48. Other Innovative Features • LONG SPAN PRECAST BEAMS

  49. Summary • Innovative RFP Process • Best Value Approach Drives Innovation • MnDOT Partnering in Innovation • Continued Commitment to Innovation

  50. Thank You

More Related