1 / 15

THINK WIN/WIN

THINK WIN/WIN. THINK WIN/WIN. HABIT 4. SUMMARY.

lotus
Download Presentation

THINK WIN/WIN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THINK WIN/WIN THINK WIN/WIN HABIT 4 By Kimberly Barnes

  2. SUMMARY • Win/Win is not a personality technique. It’s a total paradigm of human interaction. It comes from a character of integrity, maturity, and the Abundance Mentality. It grows out of high-trust relationships. It is embodied in agreements that effectively clarify and manage expectations as well as accomplishment. It thrives in supportive systems. By Kimberly Barnes

  3. Six Paradigms of Human Interaction • Win/Win • Win/Lose • Lose/Win • Lose/Lose • Win • Win/Win or No Deal By Kimberly Barnes

  4. Win/Win • Win/Win seeks mutual benefits in all human interactions. • Win/Win means that agreements or solutions are mutually beneficial. • Win/Win is the belief that it’s not your way or my way; it’s a better way, a higher way. By Kimberly Barnes

  5. Win/Lose • Win/Lose states If I win you lose. • In Leadership style, Win/Lose is a authoritarian approach. • Win/Lose people are prone to use position, power, credentials, possessions, or personality to get their way. By Kimberly Barnes

  6. Lose/Win • Lose/Win stands for no demands, no expectations, no vision. • People who think Lose/Win are usually quick to please or appease. • They seek strength from popularity or acceptance. • Lose/Win people have little courage to express their own feelings and convictions and are easily intimidated by the ego strength of others. By Kimberly Barnes

  7. Lose/Lose • When two Win/Lose determine, stubborn, ego-invested individuals interact-the result will be Lose/Lose. • Both will Lose. Both will become vindictive and want to “get back” or “get even,” blind to the fact that murder is suicide, that revenge is a two-edged sword. • Lose/Lose is the philosophy of the highly dependent person without inner direction who is miserable and thinks everyone else should be, too. By Kimberly Barnes

  8. Win • People with the Win mentality don’t necessarily want someone else to lose. That’s irrelevant. • What matters is that they get what they want. • Win mentality thinks in terms of securing his own ends-and leaving it to others to secure theirs. By Kimberly Barnes

  9. Win/Win or No Deal • No Deal basically means that if we can’t find a solution that would benefit us both, we agree to disagree agreeably-No Deal. • No expectations have been created, no performance contracts established. By Kimberly Barnes

  10. Five Dimensions of Win/Win • Character • Relationships • Agreements • Structure and Systems • Process By Kimberly Barnes

  11. Three Parts of Character • Integrity – Making and keeping meaningful promises and commitments. • Maturity – The balance between courage and consideration. • Abundance Mentality – The paradigm that there is plenty out there for everyone. By Kimberly Barnes

  12. Relationships • The trust, the emotional bank account, is the essence of Win/Win without trust, we lack the credibility for open, mutual leaning and communication and real creativity. By Kimberly Barnes

  13. Agreements • From relationships flow the agreements that give definition and direction to Win/Win. They are sometimes called performance agreements or partnership agreements. By Kimberly Barnes

  14. Structure and Systems • Win/Win can only survive in an organization when the systems support it. So often the problem is in the system, not in the people. If you put good people in bad systems, you get bad results. By Kimberly Barnes

  15. Processes • See the problem from the other point of view. • Identify the key issues and concerns involved. • Determine what results would constitute a fully acceptable solution. • Identify possible new options to achieve those results. By Kimberly Barnes

More Related