1 / 6

Receiver

DCCT. MADC (single sample, 12 bits). T:IBEAMB - E13. T:IBEAM - E12 (1E13 Max). T:IBEAMS - E10 ( 1E11 Max ). TeVatron DCCT variables - before ~ Feb15 2004. Receiver. DCCT. TeVatron DCCT variables - after ~ Feb15 2004. DCCT. TBEAM Front-End * ~18 bits. T:IBEAMB - E13. T:BEAM - E12.

mac
Download Presentation

Receiver

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DCCT MADC (single sample, 12 bits) T:IBEAMB - E13 T:IBEAM - E12 (1E13 Max) T:IBEAMS - E10 (1E11 Max) TeVatron DCCT variables - before ~ Feb15 2004 Receiver S. Pordes re TeV DCCT

  2. DCCT TeVatron DCCT variables - after ~ Feb15 2004 DCCT TBEAM Front-End * ~18 bits T:IBEAMB - E13 T:BEAM - E12 Amp. MADC (single sample, 12 bits) T:IBEAM - E12 Receiver T:IBEAMS - E10 * see Beams Doc 1256 S. Pordes re TeV DCCT

  3. TeVatron DCCT variables from July 22 to July 24 2004 • On July 23rd there were failures in both the Receiver box and the Amp. • module. • The Receiver box failure was not expected to affect the signal gain. • The Amp. Module was replaced with a newer version. This change of Amp. Module was expected to change the gain of the signal into the Front-End system. • We (Aisha Ibrahim, Dallas Heikkinen and I) did a calibration of the DCCT which showed that the gain of the Front-End system had changed by -31% (ie the number to be used in the Front-end program to convert a measured voltage to number of particles in the beam should be changed by -31%). • This reflects the different gains of the original and the new Amp. module. The calibration process also allowed us to check the scale factors for the MADC readings. The MADC readings per the calibration were ~1.2% high. • We entered the -31% change on 7/23 but not the -1.2% change for the MADC readings. S. Pordes re TeV DCCT

  4. TeVatron DCCT variables from July 23 to July 28 T:IBEAM (MADC) (red), and T:BEAM (Front-end) (green) as of July 22 (before failures) T:IBEAM (red), T:BEAM (green) after gain change for Front-End (July 23) Note that T:BEAM is now ~1% lower than T:IBEAM until… S. Pordes re TeV DCCT

  5. TeVatron DCCT variables from July 28 2004 MADC (T:IBEAM) (green)& Front-End (T:BEAM) (red) after putting in calibrations for both MADC and Front-End. Values are the same to < 0.1% per T. Meyer S. Pordes re TeV DCCT

  6. TeVatron & MI DCCT comparison MI to TeV transfer before TeV DCCT calibration (note the apparent intensity increase) MI to TeV transfer after TeV DCCT calibration (intensities ~ equal) S. Pordes re TeV DCCT

More Related