1 / 18

Elementary Process and d+Au Collision at RHIC Energy @ 大阪大学 RCNP, 28 Oct., 2003

Elementary Process and d+Au Collision at RHIC Energy @ 大阪大学 RCNP, 28 Oct., 2003. 北大理  一瀬 昌嗣 ( M.Isse) ☆共同研究                   原研東海研  大塚 直彦 ( N.Otuka) インド物理学研 P.K.サフ ( P.K.Sahu) 北大理    大西 明 ( A. Ohnishi) Introduction Additional Jets study (Au+Au)

major
Download Presentation

Elementary Process and d+Au Collision at RHIC Energy @ 大阪大学 RCNP, 28 Oct., 2003

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Elementary Process and d+Au Collision at RHIC Energy@ 大阪大学 RCNP, 28 Oct., 2003 北大理 一瀬 昌嗣 (M.Isse) ☆共同研究                   原研東海研  大塚 直彦 (N.Otuka) インド物理学研 P.K.サフ (P.K.Sahu) 北大理   大西 明 (A. Ohnishi) • Introduction • Additional Jets study (Au+Au) • Elliptic flow with two analysis method • Elementary Process study (p+p, d+Au) • pt-spectrum and Azimuthal Correlation • Summary

  2. Introduction • p+p and d+Au collision has been done at RHIC (√s =200 AGeV). • d+Au collision dose not show signature of QGP formation seen in Au+Au (√s =130, 200 AGeV), like Jet Quenching. • d+Au collision is not expected to form QGP. • Then, Hadronic Cascade should reproduce d+Au collisions. • We would like to estimate how the Jet events occur in each event at RHIC.

  3. Today’s Two Topic • Additional Jets study ->Au+Au • High pT hadrons, underestimated in hadronic cascade, seems to come from jets in both Au+Au, d+Au collisions. • Elliptic flow v2 of Au+Au (130,200 AGeV) collision at RHIC is available, which may be a sensitive probe to see jet effect. • We introduce jets additionally in Hadronic Cascade model JAM 1.010 and study elliptic flow v2. • Elementary Process study ->d+Au

  4. Additional Jets study Au+Au

  5. Final State Interaction and Jet production • Final State Interaction • Hadron multiple scattering • Resonance and String production and decay • Soft process is dominant. • Jet production • Hard process. • QCD based scenario has to be considered. • Jet-quenching or Cronin effect or shadowing are not considered in this result, but we include independent jets.

  6. Glauber geometry (h++h-) 2 Additional Jets Additional Jets Ncentral • Au+Au pT- spectrum produced by JAM1.010 is not enough at high-pT. • Add some (Ncentral=7 (Au+Au), 1.5(d+Au)) jets of p+p collision by PYTHIA 6.2 to reproduce high-pT hadrons in central events. • Additional jet number is determined by Njet(b)= Ncentral*<Nbin>/<Nbin>max, proportional to the number of binary collision assuming Glauber geometry.

  7. Analysis Methods of Elliptic Flow • Reaction Plane Method The R.P. is initially known in the simulation. vn(pT,h)=<cos(n(f-F))> • Correlation Method Calculate the angle of each particles Df. vn(pT,h)=<cos(nDf)> (pT,h) / √<cos(nDf)> (h) squared

  8. Elliptic flow v2 (Nch/Nmax) Au+Au √s =130AGeV h± • Jetsdo not affect so much on v2 • Two Analysis Methods (Reac. and Corr.) do not have significant differences. Corr. Reac.

  9. Elliptic flow v2 (pT) Au+Au √s =130AGeV h± • Additional Jets reduce v2 at high-pT . Including additional Jets make v2 reduce!! Both in Reaction Plane Method and Correlation Method.

  10. Summary of Additional Jets study • We have investigated Au+Au collision at RHIC by using hadron-string cascade model JAM 1.010 with additional jets by using PYTHIA 6.2. They are determined to fit experimental pT-spectra. • We calculate elliptic flow v2 by JAM with additional jets. In Nch/Nmax distribution, v2 change little. While, in pT distribution, v2 at high-pT is largely suppressed, both in Reaction Plane and Correlation method.

  11. Elementary process study p+p, d+Au

  12. Total cross sections of p+p collision. Inelastic cross sections of p+p collision. Elementary Process

  13. Lower limit of allowed pT • We choose a parameter in JAM (i.e. PYTHIA 6.1), which give the lower limit of allowed pT value for hard 22 processes. • Here we denote it “c”. (“ckin(3)” in PYTHIA) • The default value of “c” in JAM is 2, it is same in HIJING.

  14. c=2.7 seems good p+p √s= 200 AGeV pt-spectrum (h++h-) 2

  15. Nuclear coherent thickness In nucleus-nucleus collisions, we increase thickness for hard processes. (1+a) Put a factor “a” on sjet Calculate pT–spectrum and Azimuthal Correlation of d+Au collision.

  16. d+Au √s=200 AGeV pt-spectrum (h++h-) 2 Increased thickness “a” Dose not increased thickness “a”

  17. Jet Jet d+Au M.B. Azimuthal correlation • Much far-side @high-pT • Little near-side @low&high-pT We need more consideration.

  18. Summary • We have investigated p+p, d+Au collision at RHIC by using hadron-string cascade model JAM 1.010. • When we put a factor “a” on sjet as nucleon coherent thickness, pT -spectrum of d+Au collision is reproduced. • Independent h+h collision is not suitable for A+A collisions at RHIC energies. • Df correlation should be considered more carefully. High-pT (<4GeV/c) component may not come from back-to-back jets.

More Related