550 likes | 683 Views
Camp Hantesa Ecosystem Needs Assessment. Presented by: Michael Edwards, Brendan Kelly, Mike Thompson, & Casey Hawes. www.hantesa.com. Introduction. Jungst & Sons Consultants. J. &. S. Jungst. Outline. Intoduction Current conditions Desired future conditions Management actions Summary
E N D
Camp Hantesa Ecosystem Needs Assessment Presented by: Michael Edwards, Brendan Kelly, Mike Thompson, & Casey Hawes www.hantesa.com
Jungst & Sons Consultants J & S Jungst
Outline • Intoduction • Current conditions • Desired future conditions • Management actions • Summary • Conclusion
General Information • Member of Campfire Association • Summer camp since 1919 • Four season recreational facility • 144 total acres • 100.4 forested acres
Topographic Map of Camp Hantesa www.terraserver.micrsoft.com
Purpose • Assess current: conditions wildlife habitat unit values (HUV), woodland quality (WQR), recreation, & oak regeneration. • Emphases: • 1) recreation • 2) enhancement of native oak
Goals & Objectives • Goals • Enhance native oak component • Increase passive and active recreation • Objectives • Increase basal area by 25% within 20 years • Improve recreation by 35% throughout forested area by 2025
Methods • Systematic sampling of 100.4 acres • 48 plots • Fixed radius • Point sampling • Assessment of factors critical to recreation, HUV, oak regeneration, & woodland quality.
Wildlife Habitat Unit Value (HUV) • Assessed for • 1) tree squirrels • 2) forest game (white-tailed deer and wild turkey) • Factors assessed: food, cover, water, reproduction, weather, & human disturbance. • Average 1) Tree Squirrels HUV=5.6 points 2) Forest game HUV=5.3 points
Habitat Unit Value (HUV) Source: Flood, Sangster, Sparrowe, Baskett 1977
Woodland Quality Rating (WQR) • Provides generalized idea of health for wooded area. • Primary factors: diversity, structure, fidelity, & introduced species.
WQR Scale • Average of 11.5 WQR points Source: Norris 1995
Tree Regeneration • No advanced oak regeneration found. • Large canopy prohibits understory growth.
Recreational Current Conditions • Area assessed for General Hiking, Primitive Camping, Wildlife Observation, & Horseback Riding. • Evaluation based on “Guidelines for Understanding and Determining Optimum Recreation Carrying Capacity (RCC)”. Source: (The Urban Research Development Corporation, 1977)
General Hiking • Average capacity 14.1 groups/mile
Primitive Camping • Average capacity of 27 Acres/campsite
Horseback Riding • Average capacity of 5.9 groups/mile
Wildlife Observation • Average capacity of 3.3 people/acre
Desired Future Conditions • Create areas of recreation throughout forested land having little/ no impact upon landscape. • Increase oak seedlings • Increase total oak population
Guiding Principles • Ecological: Humans inseparable from ecosystem. • Social: Human, physical, & biological ecosystem relationships are natural & intertwined. • Economic: Non-market & market goods based on human values. Source: (Kaufmann et. al. 1992; Salwasser & Pfister 1993; Task Force 1994)
Filtration Process All Possible Management Actions Guiding Principles Feasible Management Actions
Recreational Management Actions • Installation of recreational facilities based upon plots with highest recreational carrying capacity. • Three campsites • Wildlife observation area • General hiking trail • Horseback riding trail
Oak Management Actions Through Thinning • Removal of specified species • Thinning overstory opens canopy for seedlings • Removal of undesirable oaks (UGS) post regeneration
Continued • Removal of basswood, ash, iron wood, hard maple. • Opens canopy • Reduces competition • Increase of oak sprouting potential
Cost & Benefit of Thinning:Present Day • Cost • 2 Fellers at 4 hours/Acre • $40/hour • Benefit • $165/cord of firewood
Benefits Example Equation Thinning for basswood, ash, hardwood maple, & ironwood 1,100 cu ft/Acre/128 cu ft = 9 cords/Acre 9 cords/Acre x $165/cord= $1,500/Acre 100.4 Acres x $1,500/Acre= $150,600 total
Calculation of Cost of Thinning 2 Fellers x $40/hour x 4 hours/Acre = $320/Acre $320/Acre x 100.4 Acres= $32,000 total cost
Present Benefit/Cost Ratio $150,600 benefit / $32,000 cost= 4.70 Benefit/Cost Ratio For every dollar invested there will be a return of $4.70. Net revenue= $119,000
Cost of Recreation • Heavy chainsaw work • $40/ hour x 4 people= $160/ hour • $160/ hour x 80 hours= $12,800 total • Heavy hand cutting • $35/ hour x 4 people= $140/ hour • $140/ hour x 80 hours= $11,200 total • Total cost • $11,200 + $12,800= $24,000 total cost
Thinning Net Revenue & Recreation Costs • Thinning net revenue • $119,000 • Recreation Costs • $24,000 • $119,000 - $24,000= $95,000 total net revenue
Evaluation and Adaptation of Decisions • Observe changes every 5 years • Make adjustment in plan if necessary • Re-evaluate conditions after 20 year period
Emphases & Objectives • Emphases • Enhance native oak component • Increase passive and active recreation • Objectives • Increase basal area by 25% within 20 years • Improve recreation by 35% throughout forested area by 2025
Desired RCC Future Conditions • Create areas of recreation throughout the forested land that will have little to no impact upon the landscape.
Desired Oak Future Conditions • Increase oak seedlings • Increase total oak population
RCC Management Recommendations • Creation of recreational activities based upon plots with highest recreational carrying capacity • Three campsites • Wildlife observation area • General hiking trail • Horseback riding trail