1 / 32

GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment)

The PEO/PM is responsible for ensuring that all files are properly marked with the correct classifications in accordance with SECNAV M-5510.36. GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment). PROGRAM NAME. Program Manager Name. Review Date. Program Requirements. PARAMETER STATUS.

zizi
Download Presentation

GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The PEO/PM is responsible for ensuring that all files are properly marked with the correct classifications in accordance with SECNAV M-5510.36. GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment) PROGRAM NAME Program Manager Name Review Date

  2. Program Requirements PARAMETER STATUS Key Performance Parameters Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Basis Legend E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data |L = Legacy Improving Constant Degrading

  3. Program Requirements PARAMETER STATUS KSAs / Other Attributes Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data |L = Legacy

  4. Program Resources BUDGET AND PLANNING Program Funding & Quantities

  5. Program Resources BUDGET AND PLANNING Obligations and Expenditures Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Legend Not Applicable Greater than or equal to benchmark 1% to <10% below the benchmark Greater than 10% below benchmark

  6. Program Resources MANNING Staffing Adequacy Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Military Civilian Contractor Support Services

  7. Program Resources MANNING Program Management Office Framework PROGRAM MANAGER DEPUTY PROGRAM MANAGER Staffing Adequacy O-5/6 / PAYBAND III . . . . . FUNCTIONAL LEAD SE PAPM / IPT LEADER OF MAJOR PRODUCT “X” PAPM / IPT LEADER OF MAJOR PRODUCT “N” PAPM / IPT LEADER OF MAJOR PRODUCT “Y” PAPM / TOC Reduction MANAGER PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD T&E FUNCTIONAL LEAD COST FUNCTIONAL LEAD CONT “CORE” PROGRAM OFFICE PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD LOG PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD BFM NOTE: BREAKOUT BY MAJOR PRODUCT ELEMENT FUNCTIONAL LEAD LEGAL MAY BE ALIGNED WITH PROGRAM OFFICE OR OTHER COMPETENCIES ALIGNED WITH OTHER COMPETENCIES AND ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO PROGRAM OFFICE . . . . . “CORE” FUNCTIONS PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER COMMON ACROSS ALL SYSCOMS SUB-PRODUCT LEVEL POSITIONS NOTE: BREAKOUT BY MAJOR PRODUCT COMPONENT’S SUBSYSTEM ELEMENTS REPORTING ALIGNMENT POSITIONS ALIGNED TO THE PROGRAM OFFICE (PO) POSITIONS ALIGNED TO THE FUNCTIONAL COMPETENCY AND ASSIGNED TO THE PO POSITIONS THAT ARE EITHER “SUB-PRODUCT” LEVEL SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADERS / PROJECT MANAGERS PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADER FUNDING ALIGNMENT MODEL POSITIONS THAT ARE MISSION FUNDED POSITIONS THAT CAN BE MISSION FUNDED OR WCF

  8. Program Planning / Execution TOTAL OWNERSHIP COST ESTIMATING Post-IOC/FDD Cost Estimating Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  9. Program Planning / Execution TEST AND EVALUATION Test and Evaluation Status Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  10. Program Planning / Execution TEST AND EVALUATION Status of Major T&E Deficiencies Note: This slide should be used to report on Operational Test Agency (OTA) findings of deficiency. If all deficiencies are resolved, delete this slide. E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data |L = Legacy

  11. Program Planning / Execution TECHNICAL MATURITY Technology Assessment Maturity Summary (As Applicable) Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. TRL Legend Key Basis Legend Previous Current LV = Level B = Basis E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data |L = Legacy Does Not Meet TRL 8 Does Not Meet TRL 9

  12. Program Planning / Execution TECHNICAL MATURITY PCA and ISR Technical Assessment Summary

  13. Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Program Planning / Execution SUSTAINMENT Sustainment and Logistics Activities Page 1 of 2

  14. Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Program Planning / Execution SUSTAINMENT Sustainment and Logistics Activities Page 2 of 2

  15. Program Planning / Execution SUSTAINMENT Independent Logistics Assessment Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  16. Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Program Planning / Execution SOFTWARE Software Sub-Metric Ratings

  17. Program Planning / Execution SOFTWARE Size / Stability Sub-Metric Software Size / Stability Remarks / Notes Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  18. Program Planning / Execution SOFTWARE Organization Sub-Metric Software Organization Remarks / Notes Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  19. Program Planning / Execution SOFTWARE Cost/Schedule Sub-Metric Software Cost/Schedule Remarks / Notes Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  20. Program Planning / Execution SOFTWARE Quality Sub-Metric Software Quality Remarks / Notes Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  21. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION Contract Execution Breakdown Criteria: Contractor/government work performance is meeting program performance metrics and contractual delivery requirements in accordance with scheduled milestones. Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria

  22. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION Contractor/Government Performer 1 Rating Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria

  23. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION Contractor 1 Earned Value Metrics Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  24. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  25. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION Non-EVMS Contract Status Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  26. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION Contractor Performance Assessment Report CPAR Legend Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory B P G Y R Outstanding Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory IPAR Legend B P G Y R ► No Change ▲ Improving ▼ Degrading Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  27. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION EVMS Contractor Staffing Plan / Execution Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  28. Program Planning / Execution CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION EVMS Work Package Status Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  29. Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow. Legend Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Program Planning / Execution GOVERNMENT PROGRAM OFFICE PERFORMANCE Government Performance Assessment

  30. Program Planning / Execution TECHNOLOGY PROTECTION Status of Technology Protection Sub-Metrics Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.

  31. External Influencers INTERDEPENDENCIES Programs, plus major public/private Sustainment infrastructure Interdependencies Program H Program I (upgrades) Program J Program K Program L Program M Program A Program B Program C Program D Program E Program F Program G C S P Program XYZ Program XYZ Solid denotes current system Dash denotes future system Arrow to Program XYZ denotes supports Program XYZ Arrow from Program XYZ denotes Program XYZ supports Indicates program are interdependent No known issues affecting inter-related programs Resolvable interface issues affecting programs Unresolvable interface issues affecting programs

More Related