1 / 42

2010 Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test State & District Results July, 2010

2010 Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test State & District Results July, 2010. 2010 FCAT. 42,825 Brevard students in grades 3 through 10 participated in FCAT Results reported for all students tested on FCAT- “All Curriculum Groups” Individual Scale Scores based on a range from 100 to 500

meadow
Download Presentation

2010 Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test State & District Results July, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2010Florida ComprehensiveAssessment TestState & DistrictResultsJuly, 2010

  2. 2010 FCAT • 42,825 Brevard students in grades 3 through 10 participated in FCAT • Results reported for all students tested on FCAT- “All Curriculum Groups” • Individual Scale Scores based on a range from 100 to 500 • Scores reported by grade level

  3. 2010 FCAT Overview • FCAT reports scores for 22 data points • 8 for Reading grades 3-10 • 8 for Math grades 3-10 • 3 for Science grades 5, 8, 11 • 3 for Writing grades 4, 8, 10 • Comparing 2009 to 2010 mean scale scores, Brevard • Improved on 10 data points • Declined on 8 data points • Remained the same on 4 data points

  4. 2010 FCAT OverviewComparing Mean Scale Scores • Reading Of 8 Grade Levels… 4 Improved 2Declined 2 Same • MathOf 8 Grade Levels… 3 Improved 4 Declined 1 Same • ScienceOf 3 Grade Levels… 2 Improved 0 Declined 1 Same • Writing Of 3 Grade Levels… 1 Improved 2 Declined 0 Same

  5. 2010 FCAT ReadingComparing Mean Scale Scores

  6. 2010 FCAT ReadingMean Scale Scores

  7. 2010 FCAT MathComparing Mean Scale Scores

  8. 2010 FCAT MathMean Scale Scores

  9. Percent of Students at Proficiency (Levels 3 and Above) And At Level 1

  10. Percent of Students at Proficiency (Levels 3 and Above) And At Level 1

  11. Percent of Students at Proficiency (Levels 3 and Above) And At Level 1

  12. Percent of Students at Proficiency (Levels 3 and Above) And At Level 1

  13. Percent of Students at Proficiency (Levels 3 and Above) And At Level 1

  14. Percent of Students at Proficiency (Levels 3 and Above) And At Level 1

  15. Percent of Students at Proficiency (Levels 3 and Above) And At Level 1

  16. Percent of Students at Proficiency (Levels 3 and Above) And At Level 1

  17. 2010 Percent & Number at Level I READING • 11% of students scored at Level I in Reading compared to 14% in 2006 • 1188 fewer students than in 2006 MATH • 9% of students scored at Level I in Math compared to 10% in 2006 • 942 fewer students than in 2006

  18. 2010 FCATNumber at Level III and Above READING • 72% of students scored at Level III or above in Reading compared to 67% in 2006 • 828 more students than in 2006 at proficiency MATH • 77% of students scored at Level III or above in Math compared to 73% in 2006 • 418 more students than in 2006 at proficiency

  19. 2010 FCAT Grade LevelTwo Year Comparison

  20. 2010 FCAT Grade LevelTwo Year Comparison 20

  21. 2010 FCAT Grade LevelTwo Year Comparison 21

  22. 2010 FCAT Grade LevelTwo Year Comparison 22

  23. 2010 FCAT Grade LevelTwo Year Comparison 23

  24. 2010 FCAT Grade LevelTwo Year Comparison 24

  25. 2010 FCAT Grade LevelTwo Year Comparison 25

  26. 2010 FCAT Grade LevelTwo Year Comparison 26

  27. 2010 FCAT ReadingSchool Performance Grade 3: 31% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 4: 51% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 5: 51% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 6: 65% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 5: 62% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 5: 69% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 5: 44% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 10: 75% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores

  28. 2010 FCAT MathSchool Performance Grade 3: 47% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 4: 49% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 5: 54% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 6: 67% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 5: 75% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 5: 38% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 5: 75% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 10: 81% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores

  29. 2010 FCAT ScienceComparing Mean Scale Scores

  30. 2010 FCAT ScienceAchievement Levels

  31. Change in Brevard and State Achievement Levels Over Time 2006-2010

  32. 2010 FCAT ScienceSchool Performance Grade 5: 64% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 8: 56% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores Grade 11: 60% of schools improved or maintained their scale scores 87% of Brevard’s Schools Are Above the State Average in Science

  33. 2010 FCAT Writing

  34. Brevard’s Ranking on 22 FCAT Data Points

  35. Brevard’s Ranking on 22 FCAT Data Points Of the 22 Data Points for Reading, Math, Science and Writing… Brevard Ranks in the Top 9 Districts in 17

  36. Areas of Success • 6th Grade Reading - Highest Average Score in State • 6th Grade Math - Highest Average Score in State • Increased Mean Scale Score • Increased Percent at Levels 3 and Above • Decreased Percent at Level 1 • 8th and 10th Grade Math • Increased Mean Scale Score • Increased Percent at Levels 3 and Above

  37. Areas of Focus • Minority Gap in Reading & Math • Although Brevard continues to make gains in many areas, other districts are making larger gains • Percent of students at Level I • (11 to 10% in Reading, 9 to 8% in Math) • At most grades, less than half the schools decreased the percent of level 1 students in Reading or Math • Lowest percent of schools reducing the % at Level 1 • Reading: Grade 4 (19%), Grade 6 (37%), Grade 7 (38%), Grade 8 (25%) • Math: Grade 7 (25%), Grade 9 (6%)

  38. Areas of Focus • Grade 3: Results flat or declining over past 6 years for MSS and % at level 3 and above in Reading • Uncharacteristically low rank in state for Reading and Math • Reading • 30 of 57 schools dropped mean scale score – from 1 to 24 points • 26 of 57 schools increased % Level 1 students • 27 of 57 schools decreased % at Level 3+ 40

  39. Areas of Focus • Percent of students meeting graduation requirement in Reading in 10th grade (From 72% to 73%) • FCAT Writing: Uncharacteristically low ranks in state • Science • Grade 5: MSS improved, but rank in state dropped from 1 to 2 • Grade 11: MSS remained the same, but rank in state dropped from 1 to 3

  40. 2010Florida ComprehensiveAssessment TestState & DistrictResults

More Related