1 / 19

MDCC Survey Results Fall 2009

MDCC Survey Results Fall 2009. Neil Ross Chair MDCC April 16, 2010. Aim of MDCC and Survey. MDCC (Membership Development and Communications Committee) was formed to look into the following areas: Institutional membership and partnerships Student awareness and engagement Communications

media
Download Presentation

MDCC Survey Results Fall 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MDCC Survey ResultsFall 2009 Neil Ross Chair MDCC April 16, 2010

  2. Aim of MDCC and Survey • MDCC (Membership Development and Communications Committee) was formed to look into the following areas: • Institutional membership and partnerships • Student awareness and engagement • Communications • The committee would consult stakeholders on APICS activities and report back to Council on findings • Surveys (Faculty, students and external) to gauge awareness, interest and perceived importance of APICS activities (present and future) • First target group – Faculty and Administrative Personnel – key stakeholder group responsible for conducting majority of APICS activities

  3. Survey logistics • Spring/Summer 2009 - Survey prepared • Fall 2009: Sent to APICS members for wider distribution • University faculty and Administrators • Others • Winter 2010 - Findings reviewed (SMU, StFX students) • Jen Martinell • Spring 2010 – Findings presented to APICS Council

  4. Results • General graphed data • Analyzed data • Correlated Questions on importance with likelihood to participate • Checked for trends with respect to age

  5. General Data (Type and affiliation) Faculty largest group Broad representation wrt University

  6. General Data (Age) Shade 2 groups Even split 44 under and 45 over Some data examined with respect to age difference (<45 & >45)

  7. General Data (Awareness)

  8. General Data (Importance to Respondent)

  9. General Data (Importance)

  10. General Data (Future Importance)

  11. General Data (Participation)

  12. Analyzed Data (frequency of ranking)

  13. Analyzed Data (frequency of ranking) 16 of 21 “Other” identified themselves as students

  14. Analyzed Data (likelihood of participation)

  15. Analyzed Data (Top ranked VS age)

  16. Analyzed Data (Top ranked VS age)

  17. Analyzed Data (APICS Website)

  18. Some observations • Student conferences top priority • Other activities ranked high and likely to encourage participation - e.g…. • Facilitation of collaboration • Grad student recruitment • Networking with colleagues • Learning about research in Atl. Canada

  19. Questions to be addressed in Strategic Planning exercises • Do the results of the survey • reflect reality? • Correspond with the views within the room? • Are there ways to use data to • increase participation of faculty (prime interface between APICS and students)? • Develop strategies to enhance these activities in future APICS events?

More Related