1 / 12

Adequate Yearly Progress

Adequate Yearly Progress. AYP. No Child Left Behind [NCLB]. Reauthorization of the Improving America’s Schools Act Will require testing in Language Arts and Math for all students in grades 3-8 Requires all students to score in the Proficient range by 2014

meena
Download Presentation

Adequate Yearly Progress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Adequate Yearly Progress AYP

  2. No Child Left Behind [NCLB] Reauthorization of the Improving America’s Schools Act Will require testing in Language Arts and Math for all students in grades 3-8 Requires all students to score in the Proficient range by 2014 Requires schools, districts, & states to be rated Measures progress using a Proficiency Index

  3. MCAS • MCAS is the assessment instrument used in Massachusetts to implement NCLB • The Proficient category is represented by a score of 240--------much higher than the passing score of 220

  4. NCLB • A new standard: Proficient [240 & above] • A new measure: Proficiency Index

  5. Proficiency Index measures how close a school is to having all students score in the Proficient/Advanced categories [240-280] Advanced 260 100 points Proficient Target For AllStudents 240 [230-238] 75 points Needs Improvement [220-228] 50 points 220 [210-218] 25 points Failing/Warning [200-208] 0 points 200

  6. Computing the Proficiency Index

  7. AYP Determination Factors A. Participation Rate B. Performance Relative to State Targets C. Improvement during Cycle D. Additional Indicator Cycle III Targets 95% or greater ELA 75.6 Math 60.8 100 – baseline 6 Rate of attendance 92% or improvement of 1% Grade 12 competency determination rate of 70%

  8. AYP Determination Factors A. Participation Rate B. Performance Relative to State Targets C. Improvement during Cycle D. Additional Indicator Cycle III Targets 95% or greater ELA 75.6 Math 60.8 100 – 52 = 8 points 6 Rate of attendance 92% or improvement of 1% Grade 12 competency determination rate of 70%

  9. AYP Flow Chart A. Participation 95 % Yes No State Level [ELA 75.6] [Math 60.8] B. Performance Yes No C. Improvement Your target 8 points Yes No D. Additional Indicator Attendance or CD rate Yes No Did Not Make AYP Made AYP

  10. AYP Flow Chart A. Participation Yes on A + B = AYP or Yes on A + C + D Yes No B. Performance Yes No C. Improvement Yes No D. Additional Indicator Yes No Did Not Make AYP Made AYP

  11. Schedule of Ratings • Fall, 2004 • Every two years [2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014] • Ratings will for total school population, as well as major subgroups [LEP; SPED; Reduced Lunch; Racial Categories]

  12. Sanctions based on Failure to Make AYP • Fail to make AYP in 2 consecutive years SINI • SINI School choice School Improvement Plan Targeted Technical Assistance • Fail to make AYP for the 3rd year Supplemental Services • Fail to make AYP for the 4th year Corrective Action [staff changes; changes in school day/year; restructuring • Fail AYP after one year of Corrective Action Charter School; State Takeover

More Related