1 / 27

Mapping Coastal Wetlands in the National Hydrography Dataset

Mapping Coastal Wetlands in the National Hydrography Dataset. Sean Deinert Director of Technical Operations GDM International Services, Inc. James Mitchell, Ph.D. Information Technology GIS Manager Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. What makes Louisiana different?.

melodie-fitzpatrick
Download Presentation

Mapping Coastal Wetlands in the National Hydrography Dataset

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mapping Coastal Wetlands in the National Hydrography Dataset Sean Deinert Director of Technical Operations GDM International Services, Inc. James Mitchell, Ph.D. Information Technology GIS Manager Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development

  2. What makes Louisiana different? “Backwards” distributary basins Heavy marsh area (Southeastern LA) Hurricane prevalence Subsidence issues

  3. “Backwards” Distributary Basins

  4. Current NHD High Resolution NHD built from “best available” data Contemporaneous issues related to original inconsistencies Keeping up with the rapidity and frequency of change in the Louisiana landscape

  5. Where Has All the Coastline Gone? Red features are from the NHD. Orange polygons are areas represented by NOAA as land in 1940 (most current data). These are now open water in the NHD.

  6. GDM and NHD • STRATMAP • Revised over 4,400 quadrangles of hydrographic data • Created HR NHD for Texas • LA Seamless Basemap Project • Collection, creation and revision of basemap data • HR NHD Revision

  7. Pilot Project – Lake Maurepas • First “Coastal Louisiana” experience – Pass Manchac

  8. Pilot Project – Lake Maurepas • Using the NHD GeoEdit tool for large scale revisions • Manual process of NHD Revision process • Photorevision • Manual deletion of all features and accompanying NHDStatus records • Manual allocation of reachcodes • Manual tabulation of NHDCrossReference • Appropriate Add / ModifyGeometryNHDStatus records

  9. 08090301 East Central LA Coastal

  10. 08090301 Revision Initial Photorevision process begun in summer 2008 with Q4 2005 (post-Katrina) imagery January 2009, production halted due to lack of resources Fall 2009 – Discussions begin regarding the future of 08090301 NHDGeoEdit Tool Workshops Feb. & Jun. 2010

  11. 08090301 Major Concerns • Time • Why do these revisions take so long? • The amount of change • The rapidity of change • The dataset size and complexity • Tools for large-scale revision unavailable • Cost

  12. 08090301 Questions How do we revise a HUC containing over 60,000 complex features efficiently? Future needs What tools are available to expedite process?

  13. 08090301 Solutions Step 1 • Methods for reducing revision complexity • Assessment of problem areas • Resolutions • Classification of problem areas

  14. 08090301 Solutions Step 1

  15. 08090301 Solutions Step 1

  16. 08090301 Solutions Step 1

  17. 08090301 Solutions Step 1

  18. 08090301 Solutions Step 2 • Development of Standards for Coastal Areas • “Estuary” features • Classification of Bays within Estuary • Classification of Swamp/Marsh in Estuary as a separate feature • NHDFlowline pruning / redevelopment, maintaining essential features

  19. 08090301 East Central LA Coastal

  20. 08090301 Solutions Step 2

  21. 08090301 Solutions Step 3 • NHD GeoConflation Toolset • Workshops in Jul. 2010 and Apr. 2011 • Allows for mass dataset revisions • Helps automate NHDStatus, NHDReachCrossReference, etc., generation

  22. 08090301 Final Results • Old methods: • 60,000+ features revised • 8 months+ to update and revise • Manual table generation • New Methods • 31,000+ features revised • ~5 months to update and revise • Automated table generation

  23. 08090301 Final Results • Remaining Concerns • XML Extract size • Machine Limitations • Durability of Standards

  24. Looking Forward • Reduction of initial revision time • Partial HUC12 assessment / revision, following catastrophic events • Regularly scheduled HUC8 maintenance

More Related