1 / 22

Sanitary Sewer Design Town of Summit, WI Team Members: Brandon Stenglein, Kyle Welte, Matt Mullarkey Team Mentor: Peter

merrill
Download Presentation

Sanitary Sewer Design Town of Summit, WI Team Members: Brandon Stenglein, Kyle Welte, Matt Mullarkey Team Mentor: Peter

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Sanitary Sewer Design Town of Summit, WI Team Members: Brandon Stenglein, Kyle Welte, Matt Mullarkey Team Mentor: Peter Muth, P.E. Ruekert-Mielke

    2. CORE Engineering Inc. Company Profile Transportation Systems Traffic Studies Intersection Design Road Design/Rehabilitation Selective Site Development Excavation Site Grading Foundation Layout Surveying And Now… Sanitary Sewer Design Low Pressure System Installation

    3. Town of Summit, WI

    4. Project Area

    5. Needs Assessment 153 of the 181 Parcels are served by an onsite sewage treatment. 130 of the 153 parcels have been inspected Of the 130 inspected parcels: 73 use a conventional septic tank system. 37 were unable to be classified 48 have failed at least once

    6. Needs Assessment Occurring Failures Standing water in vent stack of the drainage fields Backup of Sewage into buildings Seepage of sewage onto the surface of the ground Indirect flow of septage into surface waters Direct discharge of septage into surface waters

    7. Scope of Work Part 1 Preliminary Design Services Three Alternative Designs Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Evaluation of Cost and Constructability of Each Alternative. Recommendation of Final Alternative

    9. Three Designs Gravity Flow Pros Traditional Minimal Maintenance Mostly Non Mechanical Cons Topography requires lift stations Difficult to install Expensive to install Leakage and infiltration Will not be feasible for some of the terrain

    10. Three Designs Low Pressure System Pros Easy Installation Low Initial Cost Fluids within system will flow up a positive grade No infiltration Easy detection of leak Cons Residents Responsible for maintenance Requires mechanical devices to work Unfamiliar System

    11. Three Designs Mixed System Pros Fit appropriate system to any particular location Allows system to connect to areas with rolling hills. Cons Complicated to install Expensive lift stations Residential complaints

    12. Prelim Cost Analysis

    13. E/One System

    15. Scope of Work(cont.) Part 2 Final Deliverables Construction of plan and profile drawings Project manual including Bidding Requirements Bid Forms Agreement Contract Conditions General Requirements Technical Specifications Completed permit forms ready for owner signature Drawing and project manual must be stamped by licensed professional engineer

    16. Zones Locations

    18. AutoCAD Plan/Profile Sheets

    19. Easements

    20. Permits

    21. Cost Estimate

    22. Thank You!

More Related