210 likes | 218 Views
This review provides a detailed analysis of the contingency factors and cost estimates for the Department of Energy's Coherent Light Source Project. It includes information on construction management, owner-initiated changes, and construction contingency analysis. The report also highlights the construction schedule, delays, and mitigation plans.
E N D
Department Of Energy ReviewLinac Coherent Light Source Project Conventional FacilitiesManagement and Organization J. Albino
Contingency Analysis • CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY • QUALITY OF DESIGN • 2-5 % OF CONSTRUCTION COST – USE 3% • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT • 3-7 % OF CONSTRUCTION COST – USE 4% • OWNER-INITIATED CHANGES • 5-? % OF CONSTRUCTION COST – USE 8%
CF Construction Phase • Cost/Schedule Performance • CPI = 1.03 • Title III Awarded Amount: $63,972,680 • Obligated Funds: $10,592,451 • SPI = 1.01 • NTP: 01Aug06 • Commence Sitework: 01Sep06 • Beam Line Beneficial Occupancy: 8Feb08 • Contract Close-out: 18Aug08 • Contract Administration • Submittals • Received: 32 • Approved: 18 • RFI: • Received: 55 • Closed: 55
CF Construction (cont.) • Field Change Orders: • Authorized with NTE: 10 • Not-to-exceed sum: $100,000 • Pending: 2 • Estimate: $275,000
Schedule • Delays • Bid Groups 1 and 2 Evaluation – 2 months (NTP 01AUG06) • Re-sequence Beam Transfer Hall – 2 months • Weather Contingency – 2 month • Schedule Mitigation • Develop Early Occupancy Dates • Baseline Construction on Shorter Duration
LCLS CF Construction Schedule Jan 07 Feb 08 Feb 08 Feb 08 Feb 08 Feb 08 Feb 08 Feb 08 Aug 08
Next 6 Months • CONSTRUCTION • Complete Site Grading • Excavate Undulator Hall tunnel • Excavate Near Experimental Hall, Pour base slab • Excavate and Pour Central Utility Plant base slab • Excavate and Pour Fixed End Enclosure • Form and Pour Beam Dump Slab-On-Grade
Next 6 Months (cont.) • CONSTRUCTION (cont.) • Form and Pour Beam Transfer Hall Slab-On-Grade • Begin Access Tunnel • ADMINISTRATION • Delete Central Lab Office Complex • Complete CF Project Management Documents • Timely Submittal Processing • Process Changes • Enforce Safety Plan • Enhance Coordination with Technical Systems • Monitor Contractor
Issues (and Mitigation) • Encountering Remnant Utilities • Surveys to locate active utilities • Coordination with CEF to review historical records • Trenching to locate abandoned and unmapped utilities • Site Security and Safety • Signing and Fencing • Communication with SLAC residents • All-hands Bulletin • Active Enforcement • Construction Delays • Mitigation Plans in advance • Work-arounds and Re-sequencing • Contingency Plans
Issues (and Mitigation) cont. • CLOC De-scoping • Thorough Scrubbing of CLOC scope items • Definition of Scope Reduction Interfaces • Coordination and Negotiation with CM/GC • Technical Systems Construction Tolerances • Definition of Needs in concert with Tech. Systems • Coordination with Trade Contractor to meet spec. • Preparation of Work Plans to accomplish goals • Increasing Market Costs • Maximize Forward Pricing • Minimize Change Orders • Use Volume Purchasing where practical • Disputes and Claims • Quickly Address Claims • Implement Dispute Review Board Process • Prepare and Use an Issues Resolution Ladder
Summary • Good Progress on all fronts since last review. • CF staff has been strengthened to ensure adequate experience is integrated in all requirements • Continue to Value Engineer • Interface with SLAC, Tech. Systems, CM/GC • Support TCCo and Construction to prevent delays – keep to the schedule. • Complete Development of tools for CF Staff • Team is in place to safely construct the LCLS “house”!