130 likes | 265 Views
Solar Probe Plus Witness Plate Update David Malaspina Bob Ergun Zoltan Sternovsky Keith Drake University of Colorado Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics SPP AGU meeting 2012-12-01. Expected hits / day on SPP Based on Gruen 1985 collisional balance model
E N D
Solar Probe Plus Witness Plate Update David Malaspina Bob Ergun ZoltanSternovsky Keith Drake University of Colorado Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics SPP AGU meeting 2012-12-01
Expected hits / day on SPP Based on Gruen 1985 collisional balance model ~100’s to 1000’s of hits / day / m^2 of micron or larger dust near close approach Multiply by ram cross-sectional area of SPP in m^2 and that can be a large number of dust spikes in the waveform data At ~1/min, these spikes unlikely to appear in survey spectra, may be averaged out in filterbank peak data But, may dominate burst waveform captures (!) Nano-dust flux much higher, if seen by SPP
This will require some dust filter for • the waveform captures • But, wave-form based spike filtering • Algorithms likely to toss out real signals: • Phase space holes • Double layers • Strongly localized wave packets • Non-linear ion-acoustic waves • One solution: a witness plate provides: • - dust flux survey data • - coincident observations of • plate and antenna waveforms • (understand what a dust hit looks • like in various plasma conditions) • Less precise option: Use antenna heat • shields as witness plates
Hypervelocity impact charge release calibration for Niobium and Tantalum/Tungsten Antennas measure: Vspike ~= Qrel / Cs/c Approximate power law: Qrel ~= αmβvγ But! α and γ different for each target material Used U. Colorado dust accelerator to performed calibrations for Niobium and Tantalum Results in a more accurate estimate of true Qrelfor antenna dust strikes Combined with model-based estimates of impact velocity, can ~recover particle mass But, Q, C fluctuate with plasma conditions (!) γ = 3.12 α =1.02 γ = 3.04 α =1.26
Witness Plate Prototype To ensure Qrel measured consistently, use a witness plate Constructed a prototype Testing carried out in the 3 MeV CU dust accelerator
Witness Plate Prototype Test results: (iron dust, gold target) Measureable signals from 1x10-14 C to 1x10-10 C Measured charge close to expected for 10V, 20V, 50V bias
Witness Plate Prototype Test results: (iron dust, gold target) Measureable signals from 1x10-14 C to 1x10-10 C Measured charge close to expected for 10V, 20V, 50V bias
Notional Witness Plate Mass: 97g (includes 45 g for amplifier, amp radiation shield, connector) Power: ~60 mW (4x OP262, half a dozen R’s and C’s )
Notional Witness Plate Huge dynamic range to cover (160 dB) Use a divided target μ-plate (larger area for lower flux large dust) n-plate (smaller area for higher flux small dust) n-plate Qrel range already verified by prototype test
SPP Dust Measurement and Witness Plate Update Summary • Calibrations performed for charge release from SPP antenna materials • - Niobium • - Tantalum-Tungsten • Witness plate prototype successfully developed and tested w/ hypervelocity impacts • and charge release of 10-14 C • Notional witness plate model developed (97 gw/ shielded amp, ~60 mW) • NASA Heliophysics proposal recently funded: • "Laboratory investigation of dust impacts on antennas in space” • - will explore the detailed physics of antenna / dust coupling by • controlling each variable (s/c potential, dust properties, impact angle, plasma conditions) • in laboratory conditions
Reminder: STEREO / WAVES Dust workshop April 8 – 10, 2013 Meudon Observatory Contact: Chris St. Cyr Nicole Meyer-Vernet David Malaspina