Conflict Resolution & Student Conduct Services Program Review

1. Conflict Resolution & Student Conduct Services Program Review Evaluation Period 2007-2012

2. Key Contributors External Reviewer Self-Study Committee Members Craig Chesson Paul Osincup Melissa Emerson Chris Bryson Darcy Ramirez Nakia Lilly Melissa Williams Elaine Green • Dr. Jane Tuttle • University of Kansas • Assistant Vice Provost of Student Affairs • Association of Student Conduct Administration Board of Directors • Extensive experience in student conduct, residence life, conflict management, and policy development

3. Schedule of Campus Visit • Conflict Resolution & Student Conduct Services (CRSCS) staff • Dean of Students • Residence Life • Associated Students of Colorado State University (ASCSU) • Fraternity/Sorority Life • Women and Gender Advocacy Center • Student Case Management • Colorado State University Police Department • Support & Safety Assessment

4. Evaluation Framework • CAS (Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education)Standards • Association for Student Conduct Administration (ASCA) best practices and principles • Conflict Resolution Theories and Concepts

5. 2006 Program Review Recommendations Accomplishments New database (Maxient) Collaboration with TILT Move to Aylesworth Multiple exits, multiple cameras, control traffic flow with hall divider, and meet with students in designated area Creation of Student Case Management • Records Management • Academic Misconduct • Location (Safety Concerns) • Hospitalization protocol

6. Highlights of Self-Study from 2012 Program Review • Conflict Resolution Services • Educational Philosophy • Programs and Services • Consultation and Collaboration • CRSCS Staff • Integrated Student Conduct System

7. National Recognition Trainings Consultations Missouri Vermont California Michigan North Dakota Maryland Kansas New York Alabama • Wilfred Laurier University (Canada) • University of Northern Colorado • Metro State • CSU-Pueblo • School of Mines • Academic Impressions (National Webinar & Featured in Article)

8. Peer Institution Comparison

9. Highlights from 2011-2012 • Implemented Neighborhood Impact panel • New Responsible Action Exemption protocol • Supervised 6 practicum SAHE students • Invited to participate in a national conference to discuss the impact of legalization of marijuana on college campuses in Washington D.C. • Revised learning outcomes • Recipient of the 2013 Award of Excellence from ASCA for Significant Institutional Contributions to the field of Student Conduct Administration

10. Looking At The Numbers(2011-2012) • 2657 Student Conduct cases • 38 Student Conduct Appeal requests • 1947 Admission Application Review • 244 Conflict Resolution cases resulted in 1253 collateral contacts with students, staff, and community members • 79 outreach programs and presentations throughout campus, serving 3181 participants • Learning outcomes results reflect over 90 percent of students agreed they understood the consequences of their personal actions

11. Areas of Growth • Title IX Compliance • Student Conduct Appeals Process • Communication (Colleagues and Students) • Aylesworth Hall (Issues of access and central air) • Website

12. Recommendations • Expand Conflict Resolution Services • Conduct a Title IX review • Review relevance of office mission • Review organizational structure • CRSCS location/Advertising accommodations for users of its services • Institutional review of the pre-admission process

13. Strategies to Address Recommendations • Hire a Conflict Resolution Coordinator • General Counsel, Safety & Assessment, OEO, and CRSCS met during over the academic year to address Title IX issues • Scheduled planning meetings with campus partners to improve communication • Work with General Counsel and VPSA on improving appeals board

14. Questions