1 / 26

OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen. DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen Austria kurt@ess.co.at http://www.ess.co.at. Baseline targets:. WRM performance targets:

nemo
Download Presentation

OPTIMA INCO-MPC Third Management Board Meeting , May 18/19 2008 Gumpoldskirchen

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OPTIMA INCO-MPCThird Management Board Meeting,May 18/19 2008Gumpoldskirchen DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen Austria kurt@ess.co.at http://www.ess.co.at

  2. Baseline targets: • WRM performance targets: • Complete and reasonable scenario • Total outflow +/- 25% observations • Daily flow at least for ONE station close to end node */ 2 • Basic economic assessment (basis for optimization and comparison ) • STREAM performance targets: • DO/BOD within reasonable ranges – any WQ observation data ? • WQ related economics under development

  3. Case studies: how to proceed By PM 18 (December 2005): • Baselines ready for each case • Basic economic assessment • Basic water technologies ready to link, on-line data base • Optimization framework agreed: • Criteria, objectives, constraints

  4. Work Plan (simple version) WP 07 Cyprus + +- WP 08 Turkey + + + WP 09 Lebanon +- - WP 10 Jordan +- - WP 11 Palestine/Israel +- - WP 12 Tunisia + - - WP 13 Morocco +- -

  5. Case studies: how to proceed Optimization framework: • Basic economics – TR, CY, ? • Objectives, constraints: • Instruments, water technologies: New questionnaires ? INSTRUMENTS, CONSTRAINTS

  6. Model use targets: WRM performance targets: • Complete and reasonable scenarios includes groundwater links, realistic reservoir data • Provide observation data for CONTROL NODES, add control nodes for all monitoring stations -> compliance, flood damages • Basic economic assessment

  7. ECONOMICS: Direct Costs: • Capital and OMR for start nodes, reservoirs, diversions. Direct Benefits: • demands satisfied for demand nodes

  8. ECONOMICS: Indirect Costs: • shortfall at demand nodes • penalties at control nodes • flood damages Indirect benefits: • compliance at control nodes

  9. ECONOMICS: Under development for QUALITY: • Cost of treatment(capital, OMR) • Cost of waste water reduction(at demand nodes, capital and OMR) • Penalties for standard violations (control) • Use benefits for clean water (demand) • Compliance benefits(control nodes) • Use benefits(reaches, e.g., recreational)

  10. OPTIMISATION: CONSTRAINTS: • Global constraints • Node specific constraints • Sectoral (not implemented) directly derived from model results:

  11. CONSTRAINTS: CONCEPT VALUE Overall Supply / Demand ratio> Reliability of supply %> Unallocated waterm3/s < Shortfall m3/s < Content change/decrease % <

  12. CONSTRAINTS: Total Cost (combined)Total Benefit (combined) Total Cost (direct)Total Benefit (direct) Cost/Benefit ratio (comb.)Benefit/Cost ratio (comb.) Cost/Benefit ratio (direct)Benefit/Cost ratio (direct) Water Cost (combined)Economic Efficiency (comb.) Water Cost (direct)Economic Efficiency (direct) Net Benefit (combined) Net Benefit (direct) And any number of combinations, ratios, node specific, sectoral values, etc.

  13. OPTIMISATION: • Technologies are applied to NODES. • Each technology affects some model parameters (demand, efficiency/losses) for the different node types at a cost. • Benefits accrue from water supplied. • Optimization approach: Satisficing • First round: Model selects the combinations of technologies that meets all constraints

  14. TECHNOLOGIES: Are NOT restricted to technology in a narrow sense, can include policies and institutional change that do affect supply, allocation, demand, efficiency, quality FOR example: • Pricing/subsidies affects demand • Market (privatization) affects allocation • Enforcement (regulatory change) affects quality and efficiency

  15. Water Technologies • Name, META DATA • Description (unstructured, hypertext HTML, types) • Application domain • allocation, supply, structures, quality • Investment (annualized): • unit cost, reference unit for scaling • Operation (annual): • OMR unit cost, reference unit for scaling • Effects multiplier for: • Demand, consumptive use, distributions losses /MANUALS/WATERWARE/watertechnologies.html

More Related