210 likes | 378 Views
NS4053 Comparative Energy Security and Global Energy Governance. Week 4.2. Alternative views. International relations/international security Conflict, cooperation, politics Global public policy Technical problems, technical solutions Fix it mentality
E N D
NS4053Comparative Energy Security and Global Energy Governance Week 4.2
Alternative views • International relations/international security • Conflict, cooperation, politics • Global public policy • Technical problems, technical solutions • Fix it mentality • Recognizes trade-offs but deemphasizes politics • Look at two approaches to global public policy • Comparative • Economics
Comparative Dimensions of Energy Security • Availability • Supply, access, diversification • Affordability • Stability, quality • Efficiency • Technological innovation • Sustainability
Energy Security Interactions Sovacol and Brown 2010
Delta in energy security 70-07 Adjusted for per capita emissions Sovacol and Brown 2010 Right of diagonal is worse off in 2007
Comparing 4 cases Sovacol and Brown 2010
Comparing four cases Sovacol and Brown 2010
Things to think about • Right comparisons? • OECD • Denmark, Japan, US, Spain • Affects conclusions? • Right metrics? • Data? • We only have one experiment: history
Energy Security as public policy problem • Market failures • Imperfect competition • Monopolies and monopsonies • Externalities • Price volatility leads to underinvestment • Linkages of oil and LNG markets
Energy Security as public policy problem • Public Goods • Strategic stockpiles • Spare capacity (Saudi Arabia) • SLOCs • Infrastructure investment (pipelines) • Free rider problem • Damping price volatility leads to … • Price pegs for LNG lead to … • Regulatory uncertainty at global level
SLOCs 1975 c. 2000
Solutions? • Focus on oil • Other energy prices, investments, etc. move in relation to oil. • De-peg natural gas prices from oil • Increase transparency in information on oil markets to ensure more accurate pricing. • Investment • Consumers at risk of underinvestment, producers at risk of overinvestment. • Hedge against risk of public goods failure • Saudi or US not providing • Deal with free riders, encourage burden sharing. • Pipeline risks
Conclusions • Things to watch out for: • Explanations that have very little politics. • Explanations that rely mostly on ‘leadership’ as an explanation for differences among outcomes. • Explanations that are purely technical. • Global system has no sovereign to impose a technical solution. • Many of the argumentsin energy security are not about what to do, but rather who pays (politics).