80 likes | 198 Views
E N D
1. IT Acquisition: Shifting to a Modern ParadigmJoint Command & Control Perspective Brig Gen Peter Hoene
DISA JPEO & PEO C2C
09 September 2009
2. Joint C2DISA & Service Partners MAGTF C2, Weapons & Sensors Development & IntegrationMAGTF C2, Weapons & Sensors Development & Integration
3. NECC Increment 1 Concept This slide buildsThis slide builds
4. “There is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct, or more uncertain in its success, than to take the lead in the introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new.”
Machiavelli
5. Challenges for S/W IntensiveIT Programs Mgt and Governance of Joint Programs
Need Unity of Command and Effort
Alignment of the Joint Program and the Service Efforts
Development, Implementation, and POM synchronization
Example: NECC and AOC WS
Congressional Staffers and HQs don’t always understand need for both
DoD / Congressional support
Without strong COCOM IPLs and other support, expect funding cuts
T&E and Certification & Accreditation timelines
Milestone B – Key challenges
Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA)
2366A legislation requires DDR&E to sign off on TRA for MDAPs
Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)
CAIG has no historical cost data for SOA as basis for ICE
Business model for industry & Govt -- “a paradigm shift”
Priorities are adopt/leverage first, wrap/adapt next, and develop last
7. Backup Slides
8. Acquisition Improvement Opportunities DSB Report
Traditional MDAP oversight inconsistent with S/W & IT pgms
Proposes DoD develop new acq mgt model for IT
Multiple, rapidly executed increments & releases
DAPA Report (Lt Gen Ron Kadish)
Need to address acq improvements on many fronts (rqts, funding, Oversight, workforce, etc)
Implement VCJCS Guidance
Develop smaller, more manageable components in weeks and months, not years
Be innovative – take advantage of existing capabilities
DISA establish Joint C2 architecture and standards on behalf of Dept
DoD acquisition is “risk mgt”, however:
Need to be the guardian of taxpayer dollars but cognizant of the risk of not fielding improved capability for our warfighters
9. Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force Report DSB Report on DoD Policies and Procedures for the Acquisition of Information Technology (Mar 09)
Traditional MDAP oversight inconsistent w/ IT or S/W intensive systems
Proposes the DoD develop a new acquisition management model for IT
Multiple, rapidly executed increments/releases of capability based upon mature technologies with defined objectives but not over defined requirements
More frequent but less formal progress reviews
Each release developed and delivered in 18 months or less