1 / 2

Comparison of MKE4 beam scan and TMR 41631 waveform (October 25, 2011)

Comparison of MKE4 beam scan and TMR 41631 waveform (October 25, 2011). From 53µs to end of flattop, % variation of beam scan and TMR are similar. From start of flattop to 53µs, beam scan and TMR waveform are quite different ( TMR is much lower – TMR measurement cables etc?).

nigel
Download Presentation

Comparison of MKE4 beam scan and TMR 41631 waveform (October 25, 2011)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparison of MKE4 beam scan and TMR 41631 waveform (October 25, 2011) • From 53µs to end of flattop, % variation of beam scan and TMR are similar. • From start of flattop to 53µs, beam scan and TMR waveform are quite different (TMR is much lower – TMR measurement cables etc?). Beam scan 25 October 2011 (BG, LD & VK) MJ Barnes - LIBD

  2. Comparison of MKE4 beam scan for 6 June 2009 and October 25, 2011 Beam scan 6 June 2009 (JU& MB) Check duration of flattop measurement: peak-peak flattop ripple ~1% (including overshoot). Peak-peak flattop ripple 3+% (including overshoot). Are differences in beam scan shape and ripple due to 2 new (serigraphed) magnets ??? [magnet capacitors also changed] – installed December 2010 Beam scan 25 October 2011 (BG, LD & VK) MJ Barnes - LIBD

More Related