1 / 29

Cen /TC226/WG1/CME 15° meeting agenda.

Cen /TC226/WG1/CME 15° meeting agenda. Chairmanship. (all) TRB Report (Marco) Validation activities: Latest development (Marco) Statistical approach (Mariano Pernetti) New proposed items (Otto) New bus model (Clement) Steel tolerances influences. (Joseph/Michael) FP7. Chairmanship.

nikkos
Download Presentation

Cen /TC226/WG1/CME 15° meeting agenda.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cen /TC226/WG1/CME 15° meeting agenda. • Chairmanship. (all) • TRB Report (Marco) • Validation activities: • Latest development (Marco) • Statistical approach (Mariano Pernetti) • New proposed items (Otto) • New bus model (Clement) • Steel tolerances influences. (Joseph/Michael) • FP7 1 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  2. Chairmanship • Current situation. • Proposal. • Nomination of the new chairman. • Nomination of the new secretary. 2 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  3. TRB report • AFB20(2) Computational mechanics sub group. • 350 vehicle revision • New hardware already certified using only simulations. • NCHRP 22_24 project • Summer meeting July 8-11 Rapid City 3 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  4. Validation. Last meeting result 4 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  5. Velocity comparison. • Local reference frame velocity comparison. • Accelerometer reference frame is not frame indifferent. • Accelerations are measured on the local system that rotates during the impact. • Their integrals are velocities (m/s) but without physical significance. • We should use the relative mechanics to compare motions. • Global reference frame velocity comparison. • Rotations of accelerations (unfiltered). • Evaluation of global reference frame velocities. • If needed recalculations of local reference frame velocities. 5 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  6. Vehicle rotation X X X X α α α x y x x x Y y y y Vy Local Vy Global 6 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  7. Round Robin application. • Rigid barrier h=800 mm. • Tb11 • 900 kg • 20° 7 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  8. Round Robin 1. Same new vehicles. 8 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  9. Round Robin 2 • Different vehicles 9 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  10. Robust 4.3 • RR1 repetition 10 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  11. All RR tests. • Same rigid barrier. • Different vehicles. • 12 tests 11 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  12. Round Robin. Test and simulation • Not bad even if this simulation would not be validated. • Friction influence? 12 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  13. Round robin. • ASI e THIV are before 0.06 seconds after impact. 13 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  14. Rigid barrier results • Component analysis • Vy global: very good agreement between tests • Vx global: tests are different (Exit speed is different between tests) • Vz global: less significative. • Seems ok. 14 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  15. Deformable barriers. • Task 4.1 Robust. • N2 deformable barrier. • Different vehicles. • Different grounds. • More rotation of the vehicles (compared to RR) • Yaw rate problems during tests. 15 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  16. Yaw angle meaning X X X X α α α x y x x x Y y y y Yaw angle 16 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  17. Yaw rate problems Yaw angle. Acceleration Yaw rate. Same test Same signal but with different zero level for yaw rate Different tests 17 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  18. Comparison. 18 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  19. Comparison 1 • Dynamic deflection (ground) • Curve 1 (bleu)=0.9m • Curve 3 (red)=0.7m • Difference 25% 19 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  20. Tests + Simulations 20 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  21. Current conclusion • From RR fair good results. • From deformable barriers bad results (yaw rate). • Problem: • With these experimental results (deformable) validation window seems too wide. • According to 1317 these are equivalent tests. 21 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  22. Validation. • Use velocity approach in a global reference frame. • Define a corridor. • Define the time until the model is validated. • Different requirements in different direction (vertical-lateral-longitudinal) • After this time the model is not wrong (also tests are different) but is simply not corresponding to that test. • After this time the accepting entity must know that the two phenomenon (test and simulation) are diferent also for the trajectory. 22 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  23. Future activities • To solve the yaw rate measure problems exchange of information with some tests houses but not the tests house group. 23 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  24. Alternative statistical approach.Mariano Pernetti 24 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  25. New proposed item.Otto Kleppe 25 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  26. New bus model Clement Goubel 26 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  27. Steel tollerances influences Joseph Marra, Michael Gremling. 27 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  28. FP7 SST.2007.4.1.6 Intelligent Road Restraint System (RRS) The research objective is the integration of the roadside infrastructure restraints in the road safety system, as a component respectful of all road users' needs and with increased capacity for both primary and secondary safety. Integration of communication systems aimed at increasing tertiary safety efficiency can be considered in the novel barrier design. Activities will address the following subjects: 1. Development of an innovative RRS, including anchorage and installation systems, based on novel design and/or materials with enhanced performances for the safeguard of all road users, with particular attention to the protection of motorcyclists and other vulnerable road users; 2. Development of sensors and actuators that will increase the RRS's efficiency for primary, secondary and tertiary safety (advanced warning signalling, detection and communication of accidents and other safety related environmental situations); 3. Standardisation of RRS's design and optimal lay-out criteria, including related computer modelling. Expected outcome is the design and development of an innovative road infrastructure restraint system based on new design and/or innovative materials as an integrated component of the road transport safety system. Funding scheme: Collaborative Projects small or medium-scale focussed research 28 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

  29. Closure • AOB. • Next meeting. • May 21st 2007 • SIS (Swedish Standard Institute) • Stockolm Sweeden 29 Bruxelles. 13/03/2007

More Related