240 likes | 424 Views
“PFO Closure: anatomical variants and implications for choice of procedure, success rates and complications” LM Shapiro. Papworth Hospital, Cambridge. NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO DECLARE . “PFO Closure: What are we trying to achieve LM Shapiro. “PFO Closure: What are we trying to achieve
E N D
“PFO Closure: anatomical variants and implications for choice of procedure, success rates and complications” • LM Shapiro. Papworth Hospital, Cambridge
“PFO Closure: • What are we trying to achieve • LM Shapiro
“PFO Closure: • What are we trying to achieve complete closure • LM Shapiro
ASSESSMENT OF PFO • Characterisation • Tunnel length / height / width • Flap separation / adhesion – • RA/LA edge, body • Flap retraction – • spontaneous / potential • Tunnel openings • “PFD (patent foramen defect)”– ASD structurally merged with PFO or PFO with functional ASD
Papworth Hospital 2005 to 2008 241 consecutive pfo closures (271 devices) No late complication
3 balloon morphologies. ? LONG TUNNEL SHORT TUNNEL ? SHORT TUNNEL LONG TUNNEL
Typical PFO – LA edge tunnel heightand widthflap separation with wire
Partial Split-level PFO.Apposition at RA edge only. fixed tunnel 1cm. LA edge tethered into LA
Narrow partial fixed split, long tunnel, narrow RA openingShortest tunnel segment 12.5mm Posterosuperior Anterosuperior
Conclusion No one device fits all defects Complete closure is necessary for stroke prevention Echo Pfo characteristics determine appropriate device Papworth Hospital
Conclusion No one device fits all defects Complete closure is necessary for stroke prevention Echo Pfo characteristics determine appropriate device Papworth Hospital
Flap attachment Flap attachment point, marked by small indent of LA wall
Partial Split-level PFO.Apposition at RA edge only. fixed tunnel 1cm. LA edge tethered into LA, may not retract device traction to shorten tunnel much
5mm distance disk to disk including disk thicknessApprox 3mm waist