290 likes | 327 Views
Steering Committee Report to Council. Special Council Meeting 29 March 2007. Background. More Than 200 Participants. Process Timeline. April – Steering Committee appointed, begins meeting June – Community meetings begin July – Subcommittees established, begin meeting
E N D
Steering Committee Report to Council Special Council Meeting 29 March 2007
Process Timeline • April – Steering Committee appointed, begins meeting • June – Community meetings begin • July – Subcommittees established, begin meeting • August & September – Focus group meetings • Sept. & October – Subcommittee Listening Sessions • Oct. & Nov. – Subcommittees and Steering Committee write and revise goals and strategies • December – Open House for public comment • December – Present Vision, Goals & Strategies to Council
Recognize Participants • Community and Economic Development: Mary Bakeman, Carole Erickson, Geoffrey Gorham, Jeanne Kelsey, Linda McLoon, Doug Root, Bob Venters
Recognize Participants • Community Life and Civic Engagement: Carolyn Cushing, Gary Grefenberg, Allison Jensen, Lynnae LeBarron, Gale Pederson, Jan Vanderwall
Recognize Participants • Life-Cycle Housing, Education and Health: Michelle Bonine, Kristin Burich, Lucy Hulme, Sandra Roberts, Andrew Stark, Tom Ring
Recognize Participants • Open Space and Recreation: Cathy Croghan, Colleen Gabor, Jeff Johnson, Michelle Kruzel, Tom Turba, Ernie Willenbring, Robert Willmus
Recognize Participants • Public Infrastructure and Safety: Jim Doherty, Wallace Herron, Tony Nickelsen, Karen Schaffer, Dawnette Snyder, Hugh Thibodeau
Recognize Participants • Transportation and Transit: Steven Baird, Michael Burian, Robert Clarkson, Luke Heikkila, Donna Peterson, Roger Toogood
Imagine Roseville 2025 Is… • Point of Reference for Future Decisions • What Roseville Should Be • Product of Significant Public Involvement • A Living Document - Needs Updates • For Use by Entire Community
Imagine Roseville 2025 Is Not • Specific Answers to Community Issues • Strategic Plan or Work Plan • Description of Roseville Today • Product of a Few Grouchy Citizens • Just for City Hall
Common Themes Diversity • People • Ideas • Development • Revenue Healthy Communities • Environment • Public Safety • Health & Wellness, and Recreation
Common Themes Sense of Community • Neighborhoods • Engagement Opportunities • Facilities and Gathering Places • Open and Responsive Government Life-cycle Policies • Housing • Education • Parks and Recreation • Partnerships (Agencies & Community Stakeholders)
Common Themes Improved Connections • Transit • Pathways • Between People and Government • Partnerships Responsible Funding • Sustainable • Thrifty High Quality Services and Facilities • Parks and Recreation • Technology • Education • Infrastructure
Goals and Strategies Organized into 8 Categories • Community • Safety • Housing • Parks, Open Space, Recreation, Wellness • Environment • Education • Infrastructure • Finance and Revenue
Community • Roseville is a welcoming community that appreciates differences and fosters diversity • Roseville is a desirable place to live, work and play
Community • Roseville has a strong and inclusive sense of community • Roseville residents are invested in their community
Safety • Roseville is a safe community
Housing • Roseville has housing that meets community needs
Parks, Open Space, Recreation, Wellness • Roseville has world-renowned parks, open space and multigenerational recreation programs and facilities • Roseville supports the health and wellness of community members
Environment • Roseville is an environmentally healthy community
Education • Roseville supports high quality lifelong learning
Infrastructure • Roseville has a comprehensive, safe, efficient and reliable transportation system • Roseville has a well-maintained, efficient and cost-effective public infrastructure • Roseville has technology that gives us a competitive advantage
Finance and Revenue • Roseville has a growing, diverse and stable revenue base • Roseville responsibly funds programs, services and infrastructure to meet future needs
Implementation Plan • Responsibilities • Specific Assignments • Monitoring • Schedule • Identification of Needed Resources • Mechanism for Updating • Annual Updates • Major Re-do • Comp Plan
Thanks for the opportunity to serve! SC Members Ann Berry, Steve Burwell, Lisa Edstrom, Karl Keel, Bill Majerus, Jim Mulder, Mark Traynor