100 likes | 125 Views
Industrial Radiography: Recommendations from the 2nd EAN Workshop. P Shaw, P Crouail, J Croft, C Lefaure. Setting the scene: Industrial radiography. long established widespread (all Member States) set to continue high output gamma and x-ray sources dedicated facilities and “site/open shop”
E N D
Industrial Radiography:Recommendations from the 2nd EAN Workshop P Shaw, P Crouail, J Croft, C Lefaure
Setting the scene:Industrial radiography • long established • widespread (all Member States) • set to continue • high output gamma and x-ray sources • dedicated facilities and “site/open shop” • doses can be high • history of accidents
Size of the industry • Some data on radiography employers: • 130 organisations in Spain • Similar number in UK • More data on workers: • 3000-5000 in some EU countries • European total = up to 50 000?
Worker Doses France (2000) • 50 radiographers above 20 mSv (40% of all cases) UK (1999) • 8 above 20 mSv (20% of all cases) • 5 above 50 mSv (100% of all cases) UNSCEAR (1991-1994) • average annual dose = 3.17 mSv
Radiography accidents French Curie Institute (from 1951) • 149 radiography casualties • = 70% of non-nuclear cases • = 38% of all cases UK IRID database • 39% of accidents due to radiography Regular feature in EAN newsletter
ALARA in Industrial radiography • Problem highlighted at 2nd Workshop • Biggest scope for ALARA • Three main issues • radiography equipment • safety culture and management • training
Radiography and monitoring equipment • Who is developing equipment? • What improvements have been made? • How do they contribute to ALARA? • What are the costs? • Are new developments used? • How important is maintenance? • What is the role of regulators?
Safety culture and management • Why is ALARA not more prominent? • role of industry, regulators, experts and clients? • Co-operation with industry organisations? • How might it work? What can it achieve? • What other practical pressures exist? • Are accidents fully reported? • Can feedback be improved?
Training of industrial radiographers • Current national requirements? • training and accreditation • Achieving a coherent international approach? • Dose and accident databases? • Availability • Effectiveness (feedback) • Compatibility