190 likes | 293 Views
Transumo transition to sustainable mobility NETLIPSE meeting. Amsterdam; April 20, 2009. Contents. The Transumo challenge Sustainability Sustainable mobility Transition to sustainable mobility Program structure NETLIPSE. 1. The Transumo challenge Transition Sustainable Mobility. people.
E N D
Transumotransition to sustainable mobilityNETLIPSE meeting Amsterdam; April 20, 2009
Contents • The Transumo challenge • Sustainability • Sustainable mobility • Transition to sustainable mobility • Program structure • NETLIPSE
1. The Transumo challengeTransition Sustainable Mobility people income, welfare quality of the environment sustainability non-renewable sourcescosts of non-sustainability planet profit/prosperity
1. The Transumo challengeTransition Sustainable Mobility • ‘planet’ • CO2 reduction challenge (-30% up to -80%) • challenges for local/regional environment(noise -10 dB(A), NO2 and PM10 zero effect) • challenge related to fossil fuel reserves • challenges related to non-renewable resources (ores) • dealing with the effects of climate change(waterlevels rivirs/sea, weather conditions, sailing routes)
1. The Transumo challengeTransition Sustainable Mobility • ‘people’ • safeguarding current levels of well-being and the ‘western’ values of freedom, independency and individual self-development • dealing with the challenges of demographic development (population decline, ageing society, migratation) • taking the responsibility for global standards for well-being • pluriform society, focused on sustainability
1. The Transumo challengeTransition Sustainable Mobility • ‘profit/prosperity’ • safeguarding current levels of welfare, tuned to sustainable economic development • anticipate autonomous developments in (depletion of) natural reserves, shifting economic positions and trades, international politics • taking into account higher costs for transportation (especially when ‘carbon’ related) • ever increasing share of ‘services’ in the economy
1. The Transumo challengeTransition Sustainable Mobility • demand for passenger mobility / freight transport • new economic concepts for freight transport and logistics (‘cradle to cradle’, co-siting, closed loops) • spatial configuration vs. mobility demand • ‘mobilitymanagement’ by new actors, such as employers, organisers of events, schools, hospitals • application of advanced pricing instruments (peak hour avoidance, insurance per kilometre, slotting)
1. The Transumo challengeTransition Sustainable Mobility • organisation of mobility / transport • self-regulation: own choice, ‘fair price’ • bundling concepts and related facilities: • information systems • organisational systems for shipment exchange • facilities for physical transfers/transhipments • regulations
1. The Transumo challengeTransition Sustainable Mobility • organisation of traffic • multiple objectives fo traffic management (accessibility, emissions, noise, traffic safety) • new instruments for traffic management (pricing, dynamic slotting/slotallocation) • integrated traffic management (different road managers & modes) • applying in-vehicle and decentralised systems
1. The Transumo challengeTransition Sustainable Mobility • realising new infrastructures: also sustainable mobility requires new infrastructures and physical facilities • new public-privat financial arrangements (pps, joint area/real-estate/infrastructure development, infrastructure development and operation) • new concepts for infrastructure planning (private initiative, area development) • modern concepts for project and process management
1. The Transumo challengeTransition Sustainable Mobility • anticipating the utilisation of new technologies, systems, concepts • propulsion technologies (electric, biofuels, …) • new systems such as PRT, AGV • optimally using the opportunities posed by ICT
1. The Transumo challengeTransition SustainableMobility • Shift from current transport system to a ‘sustainable transport system’ requires a transition: autocome of a continuous co-evolution of societal sub- systems that results in a fundamental change of structures, cultures and practices. • Imporant issues: • which actors should be involved? • which initial steps could be taken? • what could be pitfalls?
3b. What do we not want? 1. The Transumo challengeTransition SustainableMobility Sustainability 3. What do we want to achieve? Mobility (“desirable images of the future”) 5. What could be the initial steps? 2. Where do we come from? 4. How do we get there? 1. Where are we (paths for transitions) today? Nu TIJD
2. Program Structure projects, themes, overall issues Governance processes Spatial organisation & Mobility Logistics Chains Logistics Networks Public/Pasenger Transport Incentives systems Traffic and Infra management Themes Knowledge transfer Transition knowledge International relations Vision developmment
2. Program Structure projects in themes Theme ‘policy processes’ • NETLIPSE / Dynamic Management of Infrastructure Projects • Transumo-A15; linking the Maasvlakte to the hinterland • PPS Project Accelerator • TransPorts: Transition towards sustainable ‘MainPort’ development • Transition Program • Greenport Aalsmeer • Sustainable project realisation project realisation without nuisance
2. Program Structure projects in themes Theme ‘policy processes’ (continued) • Transitie as a Benchmark • Airports in Transition • Test area Schiphol • Ideas for A15 Corridor • Ecology of Infrastructures • Vision on Sustainable Mobiliteit in 2050 • Working book on multi-actor process management
2. Program Structure themes • Other themes: • self-organisation in mobility and transport • spatial organisation and mobility • logistic processes (supply chains, logistics networks) • innovative public transport & passenger transport concepts • integrated infrastructure and traffic management
3. NETLIPSE • Initiated as: ‘Dynamic Management of Infrastructure Projects’ • Infrastructure development – necessary to solve capacity shortages and to create alternatives for car transport • Projects analysed in the Netherlands: Betuwe freight transport railway link and Highspeed railwaylink ‘south’ • 3-parite participation: knowledge institutes, public parties, private parties • International comparison of large infrastructure projects • Strong international linkages – NETLIPSE initiative • Concrete output in reports and tools (NETLIPSE