1.18k likes | 1.29k Views
SuperNOFA Broadcast Continuum of Care April 2005. Housing for People who are Homeless and Addicted to Alcohol. Deadline: May 19 Funding: $10 million, housing activities only Match: Cash - dollar for dollar Electronic submission. Housing for People who are Homeless and Addicted to Alcohol.
E N D
Housing for People who are Homeless and Addicted to Alcohol • Deadline: May 19 • Funding: $10 million, housing activities only • Match: Cash - dollar for dollar • Electronic submission
Housing for People who are Homeless and Addicted to Alcohol • Target: Chronically homeless who are addicted to alcohol • Applicants: Must be part of CoC and in jurisdictions with at least 100 chronically homeless
Housing for People who are Homeless and Addicted to Alcohol • Activities: leasing and limited housing search/ administration
2005 COC Competition • Deadline: June 10 • Funding: $1 billion • No electronic filing
2004 CoC Results • Awarded: 4,406 projects for $1.24b • Renewal Funding: 70% • Housing/Svcs: 58% vs 42% • Perm Hsg projects: 35%
Overview Need (40 of 100 pts) Continuum (60 of 100) Supportive Housing Shelter Plus Care & SRO Miscellaneous
Pro Rata Need • Initial PRN Amount • Renewal Hold Harmless Amount • Permanent Housing Bonus (Samaritan)
Step 1: Initial Pro Rata Need - Less than last year - Reasons: Lower appropriation More SPC renewals Updated formula data
Step 2: Hold Harmless HUD holds CoC’s harmless if renewal demand exceeds initial PRN HUD provides CoC higher of: - Initial PRN or - 1-Yr SHP potential renewal
Step 2: Hold Harmless (Example)) - If Initial PRN = $1m But 1-yr SHP annual renewal amt is $1.2m, Then CoC hold harmless at $1.2m
Step 2: Hold Harmless Two options for determining 1. Traditional method 2. Hold Harmless Reallocation
Step 2: Hold Harmless 1. Traditional method based on average annual renewal amount of SHP renewals submitted by CoC
Step 2: Hold Harmless 2.Hold Harmless Reallocation Method if CoC wants to use HH to create new permanent housing projects
Step 2: Hold HarmlessReallocation How: HH CoC’s may reduce/ eliminate renewals and use the savings to create new PH projects: SHP-PH, SPC, SRO
Step 2: Hold HarmlessReallocation Example: SHPR1: $500,000 reduce by $100,00 SHPR2: $500,000 reduce by $100,000 Total reduction: $200,000 for a new project(s)
Step 2: Hold Harmless Reallocation Risks of using for a new project: 1. Could fail project quality 2. Might not score above initial funding line Result: Reallocated money permanently lost
Step 2: Hold HarmlessReallocation If your CoC wants to pursue the new project option — Contact your FO to reconcile your CoC’s Hold Harmless Reallocation amount before May 12
Pro Rata Need Step 1: Initial Pro Rata Need Step 2: Hold Harmless Now: Step 3: Permanent Housing Bonus
Step 3: PH Bonus: Samaritan Housing Initiative Bonus Same: • Must be a new PH project (SHP, SPC, SRO) • Must be #1 priority project
Step 3: Samaritan Bonus Differences: • 100% of clients must be chronic • If SHP, can use up to 20% of project request for case mgt 3. Related to need: 15% of Initial PRN
Step 3: Samaritan Bonus 1,000,000 x .15 = $150,000
Final Pro RataNeed Ex: Initial PRN $1,000,000 Hold Harmless $1,200,000√ Samaritan Bonus 150,000√ Final PRN $1,350,000
General Changes • Client eligibility for PH—new and renewals • Street, shelter, TH • Applies to new clients
General Changes • FMR Updates to SPC and SRO • Past: FMR’s updated prior to selection, bumping projects - HUD allowed straddle
General Changes • Now: Projects selected with old FMRs. Then updated with new FMR. No projects will be bumped. • No straddle—projects to fall fully within 40 need points
CoC Exhibit 1 • Scoring • Application Summary • Planning Process • Strategy • Discharge Planning Policy
CoC Exhibit 1 • Unexecuted Grants • CoC Components • Pops./Subpops. • Data Methods • HMIS
CoC Scoring Points (60) 20042005 • Process & Strategy 17 17 • Gaps & Priority 10 10 • HMIS 5 5 • Housing Emphasis 10 12 • Supplemental Res. 13 8 • Performance 5 8
Application Summary(CoC – A) • Geographic codes • Check your geography carefully • Based on CDBG defined universe that changes from year to year
Planning Process(CoC – B) • Eliminated: brief summary of CoC accomplishments • New: Describe which and how local and/or state elected officials participate
Planning Process(CoC – B) • “Level of Participation” specific percent for each planning organization Less than 40% Low 40 – 80% Medium Greater than 80% High
Planning Process(CoC – B) • Typos: In 1 (e) • 50% should be 80% • 2d should be 1 (e)
Strategy(CoC – C) Chronic homeless strategy New-CH performance tracking chart • Individuals chart • Beds chart
Strategy(CoC – C) Past performance narrative (2 pages) • Specific actions • Obstacles • Changes in the number of CH 2004 - 2005
Discharge Planning Policy(CoC – D) • Streamlined: through eliminating the narrative • New chart: development/ implementation of protocols for: - Foster care - Health care - Mental health - Correctional
Unexecuted Grants(CoC – E) • No change
Service Activity Chart (CoC – F) • Streamlined through eliminating: Description of planned services How participants received & accessed services
Housing Activity Chart (CoC – G) • Emergency • Transitional • Perm. Supp. Housing for Homeless
Housing Activity Chart (CoC – G) • Current • Under development: • Fully funded/not yet occupied • New – anticipated date of occupancy
Changes in Housing Activity Chart HMIS Participation Codes A = All clients entered S = Some clients entered N = No clients entered Z = Not participating
Changes in Housing Activity Chart • HMIS Coverage Calculated for year round beds • Unmet need added to each Housing Activity Type
Changes in Housing Activity Chart Permanent Supportive Housing New: Is the PSH unit targeted or occupied by chronic homeless individuals Units/CH PSH Project 100/50
Energy Star Chart (CoC – H) • Awareness • Notified CoC • Percent use • Priority chart projects
Housing Gaps Analysis Chart - Eliminated • Now reported in Housing Activity Charts as “Unmet Need”
Homeless Population and Subpopulation Chart (CoC – I) • Must be based upon 2005 counts consistent with HUD Standards • Shelter Count January 2005 • Street Count preferably January 2005
Data Collection Methods • Annual Housing Activity Chart • Emergency/TH definition • Unmet housing needs • Homeless Pops & Subpops Chart - Shelter/Street Count Methods • Plans for 2007 counts & whether 2006 counts planned
2005 Standards & Methods FrequencyMethodology Hsg Activity Chart Ann. 1 night in Jan 05 Hsg Gaps Ann. Local Method HP/SP Chart Sheltered Every other 1 night last year(05,07) wk in Jan ‘05 Unsheltered Every other 1 night last year (05,07) wk in Jan ‘05 (Preferred)