1 / 19

The ADQ Adventures of LFV

The ADQ Adventures of LFV. by Roger Li, Group Manager AIM 28th of May, Brussels. Agenda. Yesterday Today Tomorrow …and the challenges along the way. Background – up until 2009.

ori-bridges
Download Presentation

The ADQ Adventures of LFV

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The ADQ Adventures of LFV byRoger Li, Group Manager AIM 28th of May, Brussels

  2. Agenda • Yesterday • Today • Tomorrow • …and the challengesalong the way

  3. Background – up until 2009 • Low involvement from LFV in the work with drafting, reviewing and commenting the preparatory ADQ IR work due to resource constraints within the LFV AIM domain. • …leading to lower awareness about ADQ IR and its impacts within LFV AIM than what could be expected.

  4. Background – 2010 • With the actual release of the ADQ IR (73/2010) LFV AIM becomes more aware of the impact it will have on LFV and other stakeholders • ADQ awareness work within LFV (mainly towards management) led by LFV AIM is initiated but the outcome of this work is rather scarce – message received but probably not understood to the full extent. • No additional funding to really start preparing for ADQ Available funding in 2010 for ADQ preparation and implementation(in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 %

  5. Background – 2011 • Awareness work continues within LFV (mainly towards management) led by LFV AIM but still the outcome of this work is poor • ADQ awareness meeting led by LFV AIM with the major airport owner • Still no additional funding to really start preparing for ADQ Available funding in 2011 for ADQ preparation and implementation(in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 %

  6. Background – Q1-Q2 2012 • Finally(!) LFV internal awareness work pays off and an understanding about a possible major impact on AIS operations is now on all levels • A pre-study is initiated (and funded) to: • Analyse and interpret the ADQ IR to sort out ambiguities and questions • To further detail/explain the requirements from an LFV perspective • Create LFV ADQ IR implementation plan • Investigate possible partnerships/cooperations for the ADQ implementation • A business case to describe possible future new businesses as a result of ADQ implementation • Estimate a total cost for ADQ implementation Available funding in 2012 for ADQ prep. and implementation(in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 %

  7. Background – Q3-Q4 2012 • The result of the pre-study’s business case and ADQ implementation cost estimate gives LFV management the hick-ups – potentially BIG investment needed • Questions arise regarding LFV’s designationfrom the state to perform AIS(AIS open for competition or not?) • Uncertainties regarding the riskthat another company can get thedesignation to perform AIS in Swedenin near future hampers full funding decision Available funding in 2012 for ADQ prep. and implementation(in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 %

  8. Background – Q1 2013 • Continued uncertainties regarding AIS designation open for competition hampers full funding decision • A smaller part of funding approved to continue planning activities but no investments • …meanwhile time flies… Available funding up until Q1 2013 for ADQ prep. and implementation(in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 %

  9. Background – Q2 2013 • LFV decision for full funding of the ADQ IR implementation • The show can begin!  Available funding for ADQ preparation and implementation(in % of expected total cost) 0 % 100 %

  10. Current status • Approximately 5 Full Time Equivalents (FTE) needed for ADQ implementation from now and coming years, dealing with: • Project management • Service Level Agreements (SLA) • Awareness • Training • Architecture and requirements • Quality and Safety Management (QMS/SMS) • System adaption and verification • Safety and Security • IAIP Production Expertise • …but these 5 FTE need to be distributed on a larger number of individuals, 10+ “core” and 10+ “ad hoc” 5 FTE

  11. Current status – completed activities • Funding – completed • Implementation plan – completed • Identification of stakeholders/information owners/data originators – completed • Initial Awareness – completed • Definition of initial web portal for AIP publication requests (NOTAM not included initially) – completed

  12. Current status – started activities • Assignment of personnel to work in the ADQ Implementation Project • Service Level Agreements with stakeholders/information owners/data originators (focus on major actors) – started and ongoing • Development of initial web portal for AIP publication requests – started and ongoing • Identification of training activities – started and ongoing • Survey of possible system solutions

  13. Planned future activities 2013 • Enterprise Architecture framework definition • Current system survey and documentation • System requirement specifications • Updates of QMS, processes and routines – step 1 • Continued awareness activities • Initial Training • Safety Case • LFV will fulfil the ADQ 1st of July 2013 requirementsby 1st of January 2014 according to current plan.

  14. Planned activities 2014 and beyond • Procurement of system solutions and /or updates(?) • Updates of QMS, processes and routines – step 2 • Continued awareness activities • Training – step 2 • LFV will fulfil the ADQ 1st of July 2014 requirements by 1st of July 2015 according to current plan. • LFV will fulfil the ADQ 1st of July 2017 requirements in timeaccording to current plan.

  15. Main challenges, so far and upcoming • Designation • Funding • Information ownership • SLA level of detail • Obstacles • Staff involvement in parallel with “daily production” • ADQ maturity in the aviation community. • How to ensure that all information triggered by a certain event gets updated. (e.g. VOR goes down (CNS provider), procedures affected (airport) – one event but different information owners, etc…) • Dependency on other stakeholders progress (or lack thereof…) • Annotation of non-ADQ-compliant information in AIP and database

  16. Main challenges, so far and upcoming • Separation between regulating authority (who can also be an information owner/data originator) and AIS provider achieved in theory but not 100% in practice. • AIS still doing interpretations of regulatory text instead of just publishing what is provided from the regulator. • Who’s the information owner? Who approves what…? • Clean up our system architecture

  17. Conclusion If everything goes as planned we’ll be late…

  18. Thankyou!

  19. Back-up slides • Information ownership identification

More Related