90 likes | 188 Views
TDV Workshop Overview. Douglas Mahone, Partner The H ESCHONG M AHONE G ROUP for Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Codes & Standards Program. Agenda. 10:00 - 10:30 Overview - Mahone 10:30 - 11:30 Economics - Price & Horii 11:30 - 12:15 Nonres. HVAC - Eley & Karels 12:15 - 12:45 Lunch
E N D
TDV WorkshopOverview Douglas Mahone, Partner The HESCHONG MAHONE GROUP forPacific Gas & Electric Co.Codes & Standards Program
Agenda • 10:00 - 10:30 Overview - Mahone • 10:30 - 11:30 Economics - Price & Horii • 11:30 - 12:15 Nonres. HVAC - Eley & Karels • 12:15 - 12:45 Lunch • 12:45 - 1:30 Residential HVAC - Wilcox • 1:30 - 2:30 Energy Analysis Results - McHugh • 2:30 - 3:00 Next steps - Mahone
Goals of TDV Project • New basis for Title 24 standards • Abandon old, flat energy valuation • Recognize and credit time dependent valuation • Update compliance methods • New computer analysis methods • More accurate performance by time of use • Encourage better utilization of utility system • Signals to building designers • Retain current stringency of Stds. • Recognize environmental factors
Who’s Behind TDV Project? • CEC & PG&E jointly funded initial study • PG&E Codes & Standards Program funding current work • Consultant team: • HMG - overall coordination, development of prototype tools • E3 - Economics methodology • Eley - Nonresidential HVAC and related • BSG - Residential methods and attic/duct models • Additional support from SCE
What We’ve Done • Homework on economics & engineering • Developed proposed TDV method • Developed improved modeling methods • Developed prototype compliance tools • Explored implications on compliance • Began process of involving stakeholders
Where We’re Headed • Demonstrate TDV method and its effects on Title 24 Standards • Seek CEC adoption of the method for use in 2004 round of Standards • Apply TDV method to CEC economics analysis of measures • Develop supporting tools and documents
Known Issues • Fairness to competing fuels • Natural gas vs. propane • Electricity vs. natural gas • Reliability of forecasts • Gradual vs. revolutionary change to Stds. • Explaining complexity to decisionmakers • Policy choices embedded in the TDV method • Are the right signals being sent to designers? • Are the benefits worth the trouble?
What We Need Next • Feedback from stakeholders • Does TDV do what we want? • Is anybody treated unfairly? • Further questions to answer? • Peer review on technical work • Is it correct and repeatable? • Can it be improved? • Support for moving forward • CEC staff & commissioner buy-in • Other stakeholders assistance in advocacy
Comments/Suggestions • Gary Fernstrom, PG&E(415) 973-6054gbf1@pge.com • Douglas Mahone, HMG(916) 962-7001dmahone@h-m-g.com